Mechanisms of Mitral Isthmus Reconnection After Ablation With and Without Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion.

BACKGROUND

Reconnection of the mitral isthmus (MI) is common after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (VOMEI) expedites MI ablation, but long-term results are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine anatomic substrates of failed MI ablation, with and without VOMEI.

METHODS

Consecutive VOMEI procedures were included (n = 231; of which 140 were de novo ablations and 91 were prior RFA failures (rescue VOMEI). MI conduction mechanisms were studied with vein of Marshall (VOM) electrograms obtained with a 2-F octapolar catheter, mapping, and differential pacing.

RESULTS

In rescue VOMEI, intact VOM electrograms showed epicardial connections, epi-endocardial dissociation, and VOM conduction in pseudo-MI block. After VOMEI, after a follow-up of 725 ± 455 days, 78 patients (33.7%) experienced recurrence. Of those, 36 (46%) had evidence of MI reconnection and 42 had other mechanisms. Of the 36 patients with MI reconnection, endocardial radiofrequency (RF) at the annular MI restored block in 16 (45%), and coronary sinus (CS) RF was required in 20 (55%). Post-VOMEI recurrence mechanisms included CS connection-dependent arrhythmias: CS-mediated perimitral flutter, CS-to-left atrium (LA) and CS ostial re-entry, and CS focal activity. Intraprocedural factors associated with MI reconnection included volume of ethanol delivered ≥4 mL (OR: 0.74; P = NS), CS ablation at VOMEI (OR: 4.05; P = 0.003), and age (OR: 1.06; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

MI reconnections after RFA are due to epicardial connections from VOM. Recurrences after VOMEI are due to incomplete annular MI RFA and CS arrhythmogenesis including CS-mediated perimitral flutter, CS-to-LA re-entry and CS focal activity. Adding complete CS disconnection to VOMEI may prevent recurrences.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by National Institutes of Health grants R61HL164873 and R01HL168277 and the Lois and Carl Davis and Charles Burnett III endowments (to Dr Valderrábano). The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.