Hypofractionated Dose Escalation Radiotherapy for High-risk Prostate Cancer: The Survival Analysis of the Prostate Cancer Study 5, a Groupe de Radio-oncologie Génito-urinaire du Quebec-led Phase 3 Trial.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy Long-term androgen suppression Pelvic radiation therapy Prostate cancer

Journal

European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 17 03 2024
revised: 24 06 2024
accepted: 27 08 2024
medline: 14 9 2024
pubmed: 14 9 2024
entrez: 13 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Prostate Cancer Study 5 (PCS5) compared conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) with hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients, hypothesizing similar toxicity and survival outcomes. This report presents the efficacy analysis. PCS5 is a Canadian multicenter, open-label, phase 3 randomized control trial. Men with histologically proven, clinically localized PCa with one or more high-risk features (T3/T4, Gleason score ≥8, and prostate-specific antigen >20) were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1 to CFRT (76 Gy/38 fractions [Fx] to the prostate and 46 Gy/23 Fx to the pelvic lymph nodes [PLNs]) or HFRT (68 Gy/25 Fx to the prostate and 45 Gy/25 Fx to the PLNs) and 28 mo of androgen suppression. The primary endpoint was toxicity; secondary endpoints included survival outcomes. Of 329 patients, 164 were randomized to HFRT and 165 to CFRT, with 159 in the HFRT arm and 160 in the CFRT arm included in survival analyses. At the 5-yr median follow-up, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS; 90.3% vs 89.7%; risk ratio [RR]: 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.09), PCa-specific survival (PCSS; 97.4% vs 97.5%; RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.07), biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS; 85.2% vs 85.2%; RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.91-1.10), or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 87.1% vs 87.1%; RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.92-1.09). Hazard ratios were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.56-1.53) for OS, 1.31 (95% CI: 0.46-3.78) for PCSS, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.56-1.30) for BCRFS, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.56-1.43) for DMFS. Sample size was a limiting factor. There were no differences in survival outcomes between HFRT (68 Gy/25 Fx) and CFRT (76 Gy/38 Fx). HFRT, including PLN radiotherapy and long-term androgen deprivation therapy, should be considered a new standard of care for high-risk PCa patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Prostate Cancer Study 5 (PCS5) compared conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) with hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients, hypothesizing similar toxicity and survival outcomes. This report presents the efficacy analysis.
METHODS METHODS
PCS5 is a Canadian multicenter, open-label, phase 3 randomized control trial. Men with histologically proven, clinically localized PCa with one or more high-risk features (T3/T4, Gleason score ≥8, and prostate-specific antigen >20) were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1 to CFRT (76 Gy/38 fractions [Fx] to the prostate and 46 Gy/23 Fx to the pelvic lymph nodes [PLNs]) or HFRT (68 Gy/25 Fx to the prostate and 45 Gy/25 Fx to the PLNs) and 28 mo of androgen suppression. The primary endpoint was toxicity; secondary endpoints included survival outcomes.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS UNASSIGNED
Of 329 patients, 164 were randomized to HFRT and 165 to CFRT, with 159 in the HFRT arm and 160 in the CFRT arm included in survival analyses. At the 5-yr median follow-up, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS; 90.3% vs 89.7%; risk ratio [RR]: 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.09), PCa-specific survival (PCSS; 97.4% vs 97.5%; RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.07), biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS; 85.2% vs 85.2%; RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.91-1.10), or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 87.1% vs 87.1%; RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.92-1.09). Hazard ratios were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.56-1.53) for OS, 1.31 (95% CI: 0.46-3.78) for PCSS, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.56-1.30) for BCRFS, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.56-1.43) for DMFS. Sample size was a limiting factor.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
There were no differences in survival outcomes between HFRT (68 Gy/25 Fx) and CFRT (76 Gy/38 Fx). HFRT, including PLN radiotherapy and long-term androgen deprivation therapy, should be considered a new standard of care for high-risk PCa patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39271420
pii: S0302-2838(24)02574-0
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.08.032
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Tamim Niazi (T)

Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: tniazi@jgh.mcgill.ca.

Abdenour Nabid (A)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

Talia Malagon (T)

Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; St Mary's Research Centre, Montréal West Island CIUSSS, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Steven Tisseverasinghe (S)

Hôpital de Gatineau, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.

Redouane Bettahar (R)

Centre Hospitalier Régional de Rimouski-Centre de Cancer, Rimouski, Quebec, Canada.

Rafika Dahmane (R)

Pavillon Ste-Marie Centre Hospitalier Régional de Trois-Rivières (CHRTR), Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada.

Andre-Guy Martin (AG)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHUQ)-L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Marjory Jolicoeur (M)

Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada.

Michael Yassa (M)

Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Maroie Barkati (M)

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) (MB), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Levon Igidbashian (L)

Hôpital Cité-de-la-Santé, Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Boris Bahoric (B)

Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Robert Archambault (R)

Hôpital de Gatineau, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.

Hugo Villeneuve (H)

Hôpital de Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada.

Md Mohiuddin (M)

Saint John Regional Hospital (MM), Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.

Classifications MeSH