Evaluation of nanohardness, elastic modulus, and surface roughness of fluoride-releasing tooth colored restorative materials.
Elastic Modulus
Surface Properties
Hardness
Fluorides
/ chemistry
Carbonated Beverages
Materials Testing
Compomers
/ chemistry
Humans
Dental Materials
/ chemistry
Fruit and Vegetable Juices
Acrylic Resins
/ chemistry
Dental Restoration, Permanent
/ methods
Water
/ chemistry
Cariostatic Agents
/ chemistry
Glass Ionomer Cements
/ chemistry
Citrus sinensis
/ chemistry
Immersion
Composite Resins
/ chemistry
Silicon Dioxide
Elastic modulus
Fluoride releasing restorative material
Nanohardness
Surface roughness
Journal
The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
ISSN: 1557-5268
Titre abrégé: J Clin Pediatr Dent
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 9100079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
17
07
2023
accepted:
02
02
2024
medline:
14
9
2024
pubmed:
14
9
2024
entrez:
14
9
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently, interest in tooth-colored fluoride-releasing dental materials has increased. Although physical and mechanical properties such as surface hardness, elastic modulus and surface roughness of the restorative materials have been investigated, the effect of different immersion media on these properties is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nanohardness, elastic modulus and surface roughness of the fluoride release of tooth-colored restorative materials after immersion in acidic beverages. Prepared samples of three restorative materials (a highly viscous glass ionomer (EQUIA Forte; GC, Tokyo, Japan), a compomer (Dyract XP; Dentsply, Weybridge, UK), and a bioactive restorative material (Activa BioACTIVE; Pulpdent, MA, USA)) were randomly divided and immersed in distilled water, a cola and an orange juice for one week. The HYSITRON T1 950 TriboIndenter device (Hysitron, USA) with the Berkovich diamond indenter tip was used for all measurements. The nanohardness and elastic modulus of the samples were measured by applying a force of 6000 μN to five different points on the sample surface. Surface roughness measurements were evaluated on random samples by scanning five random 40 × 40 μm areas. The properties were measured at the initial and one week after immersion. The values of nanohardness, elastic modulus and surface roughness were tested for significant differences using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures (
Identifiants
pubmed: 39275830
pii: S1053-4628(24)00195-4
doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.112
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorides
Q80VPU408O
Compomers
0
Dyract
0
Dental Materials
0
Acrylic Resins
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Cariostatic Agents
0
Glass Ionomer Cements
0
Composite Resins
0
glass ionomer
0
Silicon Dioxide
7631-86-9
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
131-137Informations de copyright
©2024 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.