Nucleosomal DNA unwinding pathway through canonical and non-canonical histone disassembly.


Journal

Communications biology
ISSN: 2399-3642
Titre abrégé: Commun Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101719179

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 24 05 2024
accepted: 05 09 2024
medline: 15 9 2024
pubmed: 15 9 2024
entrez: 14 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The nucleosome including H2A.B, a mammalian-specific H2A variant, plays pivotal roles in spermatogenesis, embryogenesis, and oncogenesis, indicating unique involvement in transcriptional regulation distinct from canonical H2A nucleosomes. Despite its significance, the exact regulatory mechanism remains elusive. This study utilized solid-state nanopores to investigate DNA unwinding dynamics, applying local force between DNA and histones. Comparative analysis of canonical H2A and H2A.B nucleosomes demonstrated that the H2A.B variant required a lower voltage for complete DNA unwinding. Furthermore, synchronization analysis and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that the H2A.B variant rapidly unwinds DNA, causing the H2A-H2B dimer to dissociate from DNA immediately upon disassembly of the histone octamer. In contrast, canonical H2A nucleosomes unwind DNA at a slower rate, suggesting that the H2A-H2B dimer undergoes a state of stacking at the pore. These findings suggest that nucleosomal DNA in the H2A.B nucleosomes undergoes a DNA unwinding process involving histone octamer disassembly distinct from that of canonical H2A nucleosomes, enabling smoother unwinding. The integrated approach of MD simulations and nanopore measurements is expected to evolve into a versatile tool for studying molecular interactions, not only within nucleosomes but also through the forced dissociation of DNA-protein complexes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39277674
doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06856-5
pii: 10.1038/s42003-024-06856-5
doi:

Substances chimiques

Nucleosomes 0
Histones 0
DNA 9007-49-2

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1144

Subventions

Organisme : MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
ID : JPMJCR2231
Organisme : MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
ID : JPMJER2002
Organisme : MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
ID : JP23H05475
Organisme : MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
ID : JP24H02328
Organisme : MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
ID : 20J00261
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
ID : JP24ama121009

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Kornberg, R. D. Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 184, 868–871 (1974).
pubmed: 4825889 doi: 10.1126/science.184.4139.868
Olins, A. L. & Olins, D. E. Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Science 183, 330–332 (1974).
pubmed: 4128918 doi: 10.1126/science.183.4122.330
Luger, K., Mäder, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F. & Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389, 251–260 (1997).
pubmed: 9305837 doi: 10.1038/38444
Ishibashi, T. et al. H2A.Bbd: an X-chromosome-encoded histone involved in mammalian spermiogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1780–1789 (2009).
pubmed: 20008104 pmcid: 2847216 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1129
Chew, G.-L. et al. Short H2A histone variants are expressed in cancer. Nat. Commun. 12, 490 (2021).
pubmed: 33473122 pmcid: 7817690 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20707-x
Tolstorukov, M. Y. et al. Histone variant H2A.Bbd is associated with active transcription and mRNA processing in human cells. Mol. Cell 47, 596–607 (2012).
pubmed: 22795134 pmcid: 3708478 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.011
Soboleva, T. A. et al. A new link between transcriptional initiation and pre-mRNA splicing: the RNA binding histone variant H2A.B. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006633 (2017).
pubmed: 28234895 pmcid: 5345878 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006633
Sansoni, V. et al. The histone variant H2A.Bbd is enriched at sites of DNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 6405–6420 (2014).
pubmed: 24753410 pmcid: 4041467 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku303
Arimura, Y. et al. Structural basis of a nucleosome containing histone H2A.B/H2A.Bbd that transiently associates with reorganized chromatin. Sci. Rep. 3, 3510 (2013).
pubmed: 24336483 pmcid: 3863819 doi: 10.1038/srep03510
Mihardja, S., Spakowitz, A. J., Zhang, Y. & Bustamante, C. Effect of force on mononucleosomal dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15871–15876 (2006).
pubmed: 17043216 pmcid: 1635095 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607526103
Hall, M. A. et al. High-resolution dynamic mapping of histone-DNA interactions in a nucleosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 124–129 (2009).
pubmed: 19136959 pmcid: 2635915 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1526
Shundrovsky, A., Smith, C. L., Lis, J. T., Peterson, C. L. & Wang, M. D. Probing SWI/SNF remodeling of the nucleosome by unzipping single DNA molecules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 549–554 (2006).
pubmed: 16732285 doi: 10.1038/nsmb1102
Díaz-Celis, C. et al. Assignment of structural transitions during mechanical unwrapping of nucleosomes and their disassembly products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2206513119 (2022).
pubmed: 35939666 pmcid: 9388122 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206513119
Ngo, T. T. M., Zhang, Q., Zhou, R., Yodh, J. G. & Ha, T. Asymmetric unwrapping of nucleosomes under tension directed by DNA local flexibility. Cell 160, 1135–1144 (2015).
pubmed: 25768909 pmcid: 4409768 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.001
Hirano, R. et al. Histone variant H2A.B-H2B dimers are spontaneously exchanged with canonical H2A-H2B in the nucleosome. Commun. Biol. 4, 191 (2021).
pubmed: 33580188 pmcid: 7881002 doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01707-z
Ivankin, A., Carson, S., Kinney, S. R. M. & Wanunu, M. Fast, label-free force spectroscopy of histone-DNA interactions in individual nucleosomes using nanopores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15350–15352 (2013).
pubmed: 24079416 pmcid: 4221845 doi: 10.1021/ja408354s
Hu, R. et al. Probing the effect of ubiquitinated histone on mononucleosomes by translocation dynamics study through solid-state nanopores. Nano Lett. 22, 888–895 (2022).
pubmed: 35060726 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02978
Kastner, B. et al. GraFix: sample preparation for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. Nat. Methods 5, 53–55 (2008).
pubmed: 18157137 doi: 10.1038/nmeth1139
Vlassarev, D. M. & Golovchenko, J. A. Trapping DNA near a solid-state nanopore. Biophys. J. 103, 352–356 (2012).
pubmed: 22853913 pmcid: 3400781 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.008
Shukla, M. S. et al. The docking domain of histone H2A is required for H1 binding and RSC-mediated nucleosome remodeling. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 2559–2570 (2011).
pubmed: 21131284 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1174
Zhou, M. et al. Structural basis of nucleosome dynamics modulation by histone variants H2A.B and H2A.Z.2.2. EMBO J. 40, e105907 (2021).
pubmed: 33073403 doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105907
Chen, Y., Chen, Q., McEachin, R. C., Cavalcoli, J. D. & Yu, X. H2A.B facilitates transcription elongation at methylated CpG loci. Genome Res. 24, 570–579 (2014).
pubmed: 24402521 pmcid: 3975057 doi: 10.1101/gr.156877.113
Choudhary, A., Maffeo, C. & Aksimentiev, A. Multi-resolution simulation of DNA transport through large synthetic nanostructures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 2706–2716 (2022).
pubmed: 35050282 pmcid: 8855663 doi: 10.1039/D1CP04589J
Kohestani, H. & Wereszczynski, J. Effects of H2A.B incorporation on nucleosome structures and dynamics. Biophys. J. 120, 1498–1509 (2021).
pubmed: 33609493 pmcid: 8105712 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.01.036
Bao, Y. et al. Nucleosomes containing the histone variant H2A.Bbd organize only 118 base pairs of DNA. EMBO J. 23, 3314–3324 (2004).
pubmed: 15257289 pmcid: 514500 doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600316
Doyen, C.-M. et al. Dissection of the unusual structural and functional properties of the variant H2A.Bbd nucleosome. EMBO J. 25, 4234–4244 (2006).
pubmed: 16957777 pmcid: 1570437 doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601310
Peng, J., Yuan, C., Hua, X. & Zhang, Z. Molecular mechanism of histone variant H2A.B on stability and assembly of nucleosome and chromatin structures. Epigenetics Chromatin 13, 28 (2020).
pubmed: 32664941 pmcid: 7362417 doi: 10.1186/s13072-020-00351-x
Langecker, M. et al. Nanopores suggest a negligible influence of CpG methylation on nucleosome packaging and stability. Nano Lett. 15, 783–790 (2015).
pubmed: 25495735 doi: 10.1021/nl504522n
Kujirai, T. et al. Methods for preparing nucleosomes containing histone variants. Methods Mol. Biol. 1832, 3–20 (2018).
pubmed: 30073519 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8663-7_1
Chua, E. Y. D., Vasudevan, D., Davey, G. E., Wu, B. & Davey, C. A. The mechanics behind DNA sequence-dependent properties of the nucleosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 6338–6352 (2012).
pubmed: 22453276 pmcid: 3401446 doi: 10.1093/nar/gks261
Bednar, J. et al. Structure and dynamics of a 197 bp nucleosome in complex with linker histone H1. Mol. Cell 66, 384–397.e8 (2017).
pubmed: 28475873 pmcid: 5508712 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.012
Oishi, T. et al. Contributions of histone tail clipping and acetylation in nucleosome transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 10364–10374 (2023).
pubmed: 37718728 pmcid: 10602921 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad754
Dyer, P. N. et al. Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA. Methods Enzymol. 375, 23–44 (2004).
pubmed: 14870657 doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(03)75002-2
Yamazaki, H., Hu, R., Zhao, Q. & Wanunu, M. Photothermally assisted thinning of silicon nitride membranes for ultrathin asymmetric nanopores. ACS Nano 12, 12472–12481 (2018).
pubmed: 30457833 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b06805
Waugh, M. et al. Solid-state nanopore fabrication by automated controlled breakdown. Nat. Protoc. 15, 122–143 (2020).
pubmed: 31836867 doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0255-2
Li, W., Wang, W. & Takada, S. Energy landscape views for interplays among folding, binding, and allostery of calmodulin domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10550–10555 (2014).
pubmed: 25002491 pmcid: 4115553 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402768111
Davey, C. A., Sargent, D. F., Luger, K., Maeder, A. W. & Richmond, T. J. Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 319, 1097–1113 (2002).
pubmed: 12079350 doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00386-8
Brandani, G. B., Tan, C. & Takada, S. The kinetic landscape of nucleosome assembly: a coarse-grained molecular dynamics study. PLoS Comput Biol. 17, e1009253 (2021).
pubmed: 34314440 pmcid: 8345847 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009253
Gansen, A. et al. High precision FRET studies reveal reversible transitions in nucleosomes between microseconds and minutes. Nat. Commun. 9, 4628 (2018).
pubmed: 30401903 pmcid: 6219519 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06758-1
Terakawa, T. & Takada, S. Multiscale ensemble modeling of intrinsically disordered proteins: P53 N-terminal domain. Biophys. J. 101, 1450–1458 (2011).
pubmed: 21943426 pmcid: 3177054 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.003
Freeman, G. S., Hinckley, D. M., Lequieu, J. P., Whitmer, J. K. & de Pablo, J. J. Coarse-grained modeling of DNA curvature. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 165103 (2014).
pubmed: 25362344 doi: 10.1063/1.4897649
Niina, T., Brandani, G. B., Tan, C. & Takada, S. Sequence-dependent nucleosome sliding in rotation-coupled and uncoupled modes revealed by molecular simulations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005880 (2017).
pubmed: 29194442 pmcid: 5728581 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005880
Brandani, G. B., Niina, T., Tan, C. & Takada, S. DNA sliding in nucleosomes via twist defect propagation revealed by molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 2788–2801 (2018).
pubmed: 29506273 pmcid: 5887990 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky158
Li, G. & Widom, J. Nucleosomes facilitate their own invasion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 763–769 (2004).
pubmed: 15258568 doi: 10.1038/nsmb801
Gansen, A. et al. Nucleosome disassembly intermediates characterized by single-molecule FRET. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15308–15313 (2009).
pubmed: 19706432 pmcid: 2741247 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903005106
Terakawa, T. & Takada, S. RESPAC: method to determine partial charges in coarse-grained protein model and its application to DNA-binding proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 711–721 (2014).
pubmed: 26580048 doi: 10.1021/ct4007162
Fiser, A. & Sali, A. Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Methods Enzymol. 374, 461–491 (2003).
pubmed: 14696385 doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(03)74020-8
Nagae, F., Brandani, G. B., Takada, S. & Terakawa, T. The lane-switch mechanism for nucleosome repositioning by DNA translocase. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 9066–9076 (2021).
pubmed: 34365508 pmcid: 8450081 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab664
Kenzaki, H. et al. CafeMol: A coarse-grained biomolecular simulator for simulating proteins at work. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 1979–1989 (2011).
pubmed: 26596457 doi: 10.1021/ct2001045
Waduge, P. et al. Nanopore-based measurements of protein size, fluctuations, and conformational changes. ACS Nano 11, 5706–5716 (2017).
pubmed: 28471644 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01212
Tachiwana, H. et al. Structural basis of instability of the nucleosome containing a testis-specific histone variant, human H3T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10454–10459 (2010).
pubmed: 20498094 pmcid: 2890842 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003064107
Kujirai, T. et al. Structural basis of the nucleosome transition during RNA polymerase II passage. Science 362, 595–598 (2018).
pubmed: 30287617 doi: 10.1126/science.aau9904

Auteurs

Hikaru Nozawa (H)

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Fritz Nagae (F)

Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Satoshi Ogihara (S)

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Rina Hirano (R)

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Hirohito Yamazaki (H)

Top Runner Incubation Center for Academia-Industry Fusion, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan.

Ryo Iizuka (R)

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Munetaka Akatsu (M)

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Tomoya Kujirai (T)

Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Shoji Takada (S)

Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Hitoshi Kurumizaka (H)

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Sotaro Uemura (S)

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. uemura@bs.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH