Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation.
Journal
AEM education and training
ISSN: 2472-5390
Titre abrégé: AEM Educ Train
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101722142
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
04
05
2024
revised:
12
08
2024
accepted:
20
08
2024
pmc-release:
01
10
2024
medline:
16
9
2024
pubmed:
16
9
2024
entrez:
16
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emergency medicine (EM) has introduced a new, competency-based standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) template. While a previous version of the SLOE has been shown to promote a high degree of faculty consensus regarding competitiveness, this has not been shown for the new SLOE template. The objective was to evaluate faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new EM SLOE 2.0. Fifty mock SLOE 2.0 letters using the new template were drafted and sent to a group of experienced EM educators. The 50 letters were ranked by the experienced faculty as well as a point-based prediction model and a regression model and the results were compared. Faculty consensus on competitiveness remained strong when using the new SLOE 2.0 format. The points-based prediction model and regression model both demonstrated a high level of agreement with faculty consensus rankings for the SLOE 2.0. Introduction of the new, competency-based SLOE 2.0 format did not have a deleterious effect on faculty consensus rankings of competitiveness.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Emergency medicine (EM) has introduced a new, competency-based standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) template. While a previous version of the SLOE has been shown to promote a high degree of faculty consensus regarding competitiveness, this has not been shown for the new SLOE template.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
The objective was to evaluate faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new EM SLOE 2.0.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Fifty mock SLOE 2.0 letters using the new template were drafted and sent to a group of experienced EM educators. The 50 letters were ranked by the experienced faculty as well as a point-based prediction model and a regression model and the results were compared.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Faculty consensus on competitiveness remained strong when using the new SLOE 2.0 format. The points-based prediction model and regression model both demonstrated a high level of agreement with faculty consensus rankings for the SLOE 2.0.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Introduction of the new, competency-based SLOE 2.0 format did not have a deleterious effect on faculty consensus rankings of competitiveness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39280103
doi: 10.1002/aet2.11024
pii: AET211024
pmc: PMC11393300
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e11024Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). AEM Education and Training published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.