ECG Findings Are Poor Predictors for Adverse Events and Cardiac Death in Barth Syndrome.
Adverse Outcome
Barth Syndrome
Death
ECG
Fragmented QRS
Pediatrics
cardiomyopathy
Journal
Progress in pediatric cardiology
ISSN: 1058-9813
Titre abrégé: Prog Pediatr Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9209539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2024
Dec 2024
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
12
2025
medline:
17
9
2024
pubmed:
17
9
2024
entrez:
16
9
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with Barth syndrome (BTHS) can present with cardiomyopathy. BTHS subjects are at risk for cardiac adverse outcomes throughout life, including malignant arrhythmias and death. Electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters have never been assessed as a tool to predict adverse outcomes in individuals with BTHS. The purpose of this study was to identify any ECG parameters including QRS fragmentation, presence of arrhythmia, or abnormal intervals that could predict adverse outcomes and cardiac death among the BTHS population. We performed a retrospective case referent study on subjects with BTHS (n=43), and compared them with our reference group, subjects with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) from a single institution (n=53) from 2007-2021. BTHS data was obtained from subjects attending the biennial Barth Syndrome Foundation International Scientific, Medical, and Family Conferences (BSFISMFC) from 2002-2018. ECG data from first and last available ECG's prior to an adverse event or cardiac death was analyzed, and then multivariable regression was performed to determine odd ratios between ECG characteristics and adverse events/cardiac death. No ECG variables were statistically significant predictors of adverse events or cardiac death in the BTHS group. Last ECG QRS fragmentation trended to statistically significance (OR 13.3, p=0.12) in predicting adverse events in the DCM group. No ECG parameters, including QRS fragmentation, presence of arrhythmia, or abnormal interval values predict adverse events or cardiac death among BTHS patients. QRS fragmentation may be a predictor of adverse events in the DCM population.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Patients with Barth syndrome (BTHS) can present with cardiomyopathy. BTHS subjects are at risk for cardiac adverse outcomes throughout life, including malignant arrhythmias and death. Electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters have never been assessed as a tool to predict adverse outcomes in individuals with BTHS.
Objectives
UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this study was to identify any ECG parameters including QRS fragmentation, presence of arrhythmia, or abnormal intervals that could predict adverse outcomes and cardiac death among the BTHS population.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We performed a retrospective case referent study on subjects with BTHS (n=43), and compared them with our reference group, subjects with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) from a single institution (n=53) from 2007-2021. BTHS data was obtained from subjects attending the biennial Barth Syndrome Foundation International Scientific, Medical, and Family Conferences (BSFISMFC) from 2002-2018. ECG data from first and last available ECG's prior to an adverse event or cardiac death was analyzed, and then multivariable regression was performed to determine odd ratios between ECG characteristics and adverse events/cardiac death.
Results
UNASSIGNED
No ECG variables were statistically significant predictors of adverse events or cardiac death in the BTHS group. Last ECG QRS fragmentation trended to statistically significance (OR 13.3, p=0.12) in predicting adverse events in the DCM group.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
No ECG parameters, including QRS fragmentation, presence of arrhythmia, or abnormal interval values predict adverse events or cardiac death among BTHS patients. QRS fragmentation may be a predictor of adverse events in the DCM population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39281339
doi: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2024.101750
pmc: PMC11392022
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest: All authors report that they have no conflict of interests with this study.