Improving quality of breast conservative surgery for lower quadrants cancer in small and medium sized breasts: Crescent technique versus J mammoplasty.

Breast conservative surgery (BCS) Crescent technique J-mammoplasty technique aesthetic outcome oncoplastic

Journal

Gland surgery
ISSN: 2227-684X
Titre abrégé: Gland Surg
Pays: China (Republic : 1949- )
ID NLM: 101606638

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 05 03 2024
accepted: 29 05 2024
medline: 17 9 2024
pubmed: 17 9 2024
entrez: 16 9 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

For medium/small size breast, breast conserving surgery (BCS) is usually associated to poor cosmetic results. The objective of the study is to evaluate oncological safety and cosmetic results comparing the "Crescent" and the "J" mammoplasty technique and to develop an algorithm for the treatment of breast cancer located in lower quadrants in medium/small breast. We retrospectively analysed all consecutive patients who underwent a "J" mammoplasty or a "Crescent" technique at AUSL IRCCS Reggio Emilia between 2016 and 2021. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, the first group including 29 "Crescent" technique procedures and the second one including 29 patients who underwent the "J" mammoplasty technique. Oncological safety and surgical minor and major complications were evaluated. Aesthetic results were evaluated by two senior breast surgeons, independently, at least 6 months after radiotherapy (RT). At follow-up of 36 months, no recurrences and no major complications were observed in both groups. Minor complications were observed in two (6.9%) "J" group cases and in six (20.7%) "Crescent" ones (P<0.05). The 96.6% of "Crescent" and the 73.5% of "J" cases were judged excellent/good. One (3.4%) "Crescent" was judged fair versus six (20.7%) "J" mammoplasty. Two (6.9%) "J" cases were judged poor, requiring ipsilateral re-operation. When a favourable ratio between tumor size and breast volume is present, BCS can be performed for tumors located in the lower quadrants. Evaluating patients' anthropometric characteristics, skin involvement and tumor features is the key to select the right technique and to obtain both great cosmetic result and low rate of complications.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
For medium/small size breast, breast conserving surgery (BCS) is usually associated to poor cosmetic results. The objective of the study is to evaluate oncological safety and cosmetic results comparing the "Crescent" and the "J" mammoplasty technique and to develop an algorithm for the treatment of breast cancer located in lower quadrants in medium/small breast.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We retrospectively analysed all consecutive patients who underwent a "J" mammoplasty or a "Crescent" technique at AUSL IRCCS Reggio Emilia between 2016 and 2021. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, the first group including 29 "Crescent" technique procedures and the second one including 29 patients who underwent the "J" mammoplasty technique. Oncological safety and surgical minor and major complications were evaluated. Aesthetic results were evaluated by two senior breast surgeons, independently, at least 6 months after radiotherapy (RT).
Results UNASSIGNED
At follow-up of 36 months, no recurrences and no major complications were observed in both groups. Minor complications were observed in two (6.9%) "J" group cases and in six (20.7%) "Crescent" ones (P<0.05). The 96.6% of "Crescent" and the 73.5% of "J" cases were judged excellent/good. One (3.4%) "Crescent" was judged fair versus six (20.7%) "J" mammoplasty. Two (6.9%) "J" cases were judged poor, requiring ipsilateral re-operation.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
When a favourable ratio between tumor size and breast volume is present, BCS can be performed for tumors located in the lower quadrants. Evaluating patients' anthropometric characteristics, skin involvement and tumor features is the key to select the right technique and to obtain both great cosmetic result and low rate of complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39282028
doi: 10.21037/gs-24-74
pii: gs-13-08-1370
pmc: PMC11399005
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1370-1377

Informations de copyright

2024 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-24-74/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Giuseppe Falco (G)

Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Ljuba Morando (L)

Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Giulia Borgonovo (G)

Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Evelina Begnini (E)

Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Saverio Coiro (S)

Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Monica Foroni (M)

Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Eugenio Cenini (E)

Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Fabio Castagnetti (F)

Plastic And Reconstructive Surgery, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Simone Mele (S)

Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Guglielmo Ferrari (G)

Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH