Impact of isolated fetal congenital heart disease on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes.

adverse pregnancy outcomes congenital heart disease prenatal diagnosis preterm delivery pre‐eclampsia small for gestational age

Journal

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Sep 2024
Historique:
revised: 01 09 2024
received: 18 04 2024
accepted: 02 09 2024
medline: 17 9 2024
pubmed: 17 9 2024
entrez: 16 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the obstetric complications associated with isolated fetal congenital heart disease (CHD) by comparing pregnancies with and without this condition. In this retrospective matched comparative study at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, we included 233 postnatally confirmed fetal CHD cases and 466 unaffected fetuses. Controls were selected at a 2:1 ratio, ensuring that they matched the cases in terms of maternal age, parity, and history of preterm deliveries. Fetal CHD was significantly associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm labor (30% vs 9.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-4.36; P = 0.003), delivery before 34 gestational weeks (11.6% vs 0.6%; aOR 12.33; 95% CI: 3.32-45.78; P < 0.001), and pre-eclampsia (11.6% vs 2.8%; aOR 2.19; 95% CI: 1.01-4.76; P = 0.047). Newborns with CHD were significantly more likely to be small for gestational age (10.7% vs 5.2%; aOR 2.09; 95% CI: 1.11-3.94; P = 0.022). Intriguingly, a prenatal diagnosis of CHD was associated with a reduced risk of preterm delivery in affected pregnancies (P = 0.002). Pregnancies affected by isolated fetal CHD demonstrated a higher propensity for several adverse outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of prenatal CHD detection and tailored perinatal care to potentially improve both pregnancy outcomes and neonatal health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39282796
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15912
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
ID : RO16531060

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Références

Matthiesen NB, Ostergaard JR, Hjortdal VE, Henriksen TB. Congenital heart defects and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. J Pediatr. 2021;229:168‐174.e5.
van Velzen CL, Turkeri F, Pajkrt E, et al. Pregnancy complications in singleton pregnancies with isolated fetal heart defects. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(11):1273‐1280.
van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2241‐2247.
Laas E, Lelong N, Ancel PY, et al. Impact of preterm birth on infant mortality for newborns with congenital heart defects: the EPICARD population‐based cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):124.
Goff DA, Luan X, Gerdes M, et al. Younger gestational age is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes after cardiac surgery in infancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(3):535‐542.
Costello JM, Pasquali SK, Jacobs JP, et al. Gestational age at birth and outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Circulation. 2014;129(24):2511‐2517.
Giorgione V, Fesslova V, Boveri S, Candiani M, Khalil A, Cavoretto P. Adverse perinatal outcome and placental abnormalities in pregnancies with major fetal congenital heart defects: a retrospective case–control study. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(11):1390‐1397.
Wallenstein MB, Harper LM, Odibo AO, et al. Fetal congenital heart disease and intrauterine growth restriction: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(6):662‐665.
Ghanchi A, Derridj N, Bonnet D, Bertille N, Salomon LJ, Khoshnood B. Children born with congenital heart defects and growth restriction at birth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3056.
Malik S, Cleves MA, Zhao W, Correa A, Hobbs CA, National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Association between congenital heart defects and small for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2007;119(4):e976‐e982.
Laas E, Lelong N, Thieulin AC, et al. Preterm birth and congenital heart defects: a population‐based study. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):e829‐e837.
Tanner K, Sabrine N, Wren C. Cardiovascular malformations among preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):e833‐e838.
Miremberg H, Gindes L, Schreiber L, Raucher Sternfeld A, Bar J, Kovo M. The association between severe fetal congenital heart defects and placental vascular malperfusion lesions. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(11):962‐967.
Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Spong CY, Casey BM. Williams Obstetrics. 26th ed. McGraw‐Hill Education/Medical; 2022.
Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta‐analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59.
Leon RL, Sharma K, Mir IN, et al. Placental vascular malperfusion lesions in fetal congenital heart disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(4):620.e1‐620.e8.
Trento LU, Pruetz JD, Chang RK, Detterich J, Sklansky MS. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: impact of mode of delivery on neonatal outcome. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(13):1250‐1255.
Landis BJ, Levey A, Levasseur SM, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease and birth outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34(3):597‐605.
Levey A, Glickstein JS, Kleinman CS, et al. The impact of prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease on neonatal outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;31(5):587‐597.
Castellanos DA, Lopez KN, Salemi JL, Shamshirsaz AA, Wang Y, Morris SA. Trends in preterm delivery among singleton gestations with critical congenital heart disease. J Pediatr. 2020;222:28‐34.e4.
Han B, Tang Y, Qu X, Deng C, Wang X, Li J. Comparison of the 1‐year survival rate in infants with congenital heart disease diagnosed by prenatal and postnatal ultrasound: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(4):e23325.
Coutinho CM, Sotiriadis A, Odibo A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(3):435‐456.
Prediction and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: ACOG practice bulletin, number 234. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138(2):e65‐e90.
Afshar Y, Hogan WJ, Conturie C, et al. Multi‐institutional practice‐patterns in fetal congenital heart disease following implementation of a standardized clinical assessment and management plan. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(15):e021598.

Auteurs

Yossawadee Kittiratanapinan (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Sanitra Anuwutnavin (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Supaluck Kanjanauthai (S)

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Punnanee Wutthigate (P)

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn (D)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Saifon Chawanpaiboon (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Classifications MeSH