Prospects of Food Taxes for Planetary Health: A Systematic Review of Modeling Studies.

diet change food tax modeling study planetary health public health nutrition

Journal

Nutrition reviews
ISSN: 1753-4887
Titre abrégé: Nutr Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376405

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 17 9 2024
pubmed: 17 9 2024
entrez: 16 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of this study was to analyze the modeling methodologies of fiscal policies on food with health or environmental outcomes. Evidence suggests that fiscal policies on food can contribute to addressing the growing burden of noncommunicable diseases and climate change. These policies should be modeled in advance to see the implications for the environment and health. A systematic review was conducted of studies that modeled fiscal policies on the food groups targeted by the EAT-Lancet Commission and examined their health or environmental outcomes. The Scopus and PubMed databases were searched on November 30, 2021. The records were double-screened and data on modeling methods were extracted from the included studies. A total of 55 studies were included in the review. The most frequently modeled interventions were fruit and vegetable subsidies (n = 19) and carbon taxes on food (n = 17). One study also included a consumer education campaign to enhance the effect of fiscal policy. The outcomes are highly sensitive to consumption change and price elasticities. None of the studies modeled the health effects of environmental outcomes. A model that covered all the relevant aspects of the issue was not found. Some parts were missing from all the included models. It is advisable to model the stability of the amount of diet consumed, either by keeping the amount of food in the diet stable or by taking a more conservative approach and keeping the consumed calories stable. It is preferable to keep the included diseases and environmental boundaries broad to have more valid outcome estimates on this complex issue. A more comprehensive understanding of fiscal policies would allow us to better anticipate the impact of our actions and inactions and thus could lead to more sophisticated measures taken by policymakers. PROSPERO registration no. 2022 CRD42022291945/.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to analyze the modeling methodologies of fiscal policies on food with health or environmental outcomes.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Evidence suggests that fiscal policies on food can contribute to addressing the growing burden of noncommunicable diseases and climate change. These policies should be modeled in advance to see the implications for the environment and health.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic review was conducted of studies that modeled fiscal policies on the food groups targeted by the EAT-Lancet Commission and examined their health or environmental outcomes. The Scopus and PubMed databases were searched on November 30, 2021. The records were double-screened and data on modeling methods were extracted from the included studies.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 55 studies were included in the review. The most frequently modeled interventions were fruit and vegetable subsidies (n = 19) and carbon taxes on food (n = 17). One study also included a consumer education campaign to enhance the effect of fiscal policy. The outcomes are highly sensitive to consumption change and price elasticities. None of the studies modeled the health effects of environmental outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
A model that covered all the relevant aspects of the issue was not found. Some parts were missing from all the included models. It is advisable to model the stability of the amount of diet consumed, either by keeping the amount of food in the diet stable or by taking a more conservative approach and keeping the consumed calories stable. It is preferable to keep the included diseases and environmental boundaries broad to have more valid outcome estimates on this complex issue. A more comprehensive understanding of fiscal policies would allow us to better anticipate the impact of our actions and inactions and thus could lead to more sophisticated measures taken by policymakers.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
PROSPERO registration no. 2022 CRD42022291945/.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39283704
pii: 7758653
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae111
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute.

Auteurs

Ágota Mészáros (Á)

Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Norbert Dósa (N)

Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Anna Péterfi (A)

Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Krisztián Horváth (K)

Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Zsófia Szarvas (Z)

Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Jeremiás M Balogh (JM)

Department of Agricultural Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.

Balázs Munkácsy (B)

Budapest Institute for Policy Analysis, Budapest, Hungary.
Doctoral School of Education, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Zoltán Vokó (Z)

Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.

Classifications MeSH