"Do they think I'm good enough?": General practitioners' experiences when treating doctor-patients.
Family
General practitioners
Grounded theory
Physician-patient relations
Physicians
Physician’s role
Practice patterns
Journal
BMC primary care
ISSN: 2731-4553
Titre abrégé: BMC Prim Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918300889006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Sep 2024
16 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
26
04
2024
accepted:
05
09
2024
medline:
17
9
2024
pubmed:
17
9
2024
entrez:
16
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
When doctors seek medical care, there is evidence that the treating doctor can struggle to provide optimal treatment. Guidelines state that doctor-patients should be treated like any other patient, but this is challenging for the treating doctor. This study set out to explore both the positive experiences general practitioners (GPs) have when caring for doctor-patients, and the challenges they confront. It sought to identify whether GPs believe they treat doctor-patients differently to other patients and if so, in what ways, for what reasons, and how this impacts their provision of care. The study also aimed to develop a model that makes sense of GPs' experiences when caring for a patient who is also a medical doctor. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 26 GPs were carried out, with analysis of de-identified transcripts using pragmatic grounded theory. Evolving understandings were used to develop a model to make sense of GPs' experiences caring for their doctor-patients. The core aspects of GPs' experiences of treating fellow doctors centred around concepts of respect and collegiality. These play a central role in mediating how a treating doctor experiences a consultation with a doctor-patient, influencing the quality of care provided. GPs shared that the use of medical language (and assumptions about the doctor-patient's knowledge/behaviours), testing, the exploration of sensitive issues, and the degree of shared decision-making were areas where their treatment might vary when treating a doctor-patient. Treating doctors often experience anxiety about errors and the likely scrutiny from the medical, and wider community. The decision to treat the doctor-patient differently was driven by a desire to maintain a sense of collegiality, to not offend, to meet their doctor-patient's expectations, and to appear competent. The professional socialisation of doctors, with its emphasis on collegiality and respect, plays a significant role in the dynamics of the therapeutic relationship when a doctor treats a doctor-patient. Current guidelines make little reference to these dynamics with the over-simplified 'keep it normal' recommendations. Treating doctors need evidence-informed training to navigate these challenges and ensure they can effectively deliver quality care to their doctor-patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
When doctors seek medical care, there is evidence that the treating doctor can struggle to provide optimal treatment. Guidelines state that doctor-patients should be treated like any other patient, but this is challenging for the treating doctor. This study set out to explore both the positive experiences general practitioners (GPs) have when caring for doctor-patients, and the challenges they confront. It sought to identify whether GPs believe they treat doctor-patients differently to other patients and if so, in what ways, for what reasons, and how this impacts their provision of care. The study also aimed to develop a model that makes sense of GPs' experiences when caring for a patient who is also a medical doctor.
METHOD
METHODS
Qualitative in-depth interviews with 26 GPs were carried out, with analysis of de-identified transcripts using pragmatic grounded theory. Evolving understandings were used to develop a model to make sense of GPs' experiences caring for their doctor-patients.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The core aspects of GPs' experiences of treating fellow doctors centred around concepts of respect and collegiality. These play a central role in mediating how a treating doctor experiences a consultation with a doctor-patient, influencing the quality of care provided. GPs shared that the use of medical language (and assumptions about the doctor-patient's knowledge/behaviours), testing, the exploration of sensitive issues, and the degree of shared decision-making were areas where their treatment might vary when treating a doctor-patient. Treating doctors often experience anxiety about errors and the likely scrutiny from the medical, and wider community. The decision to treat the doctor-patient differently was driven by a desire to maintain a sense of collegiality, to not offend, to meet their doctor-patient's expectations, and to appear competent.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The professional socialisation of doctors, with its emphasis on collegiality and respect, plays a significant role in the dynamics of the therapeutic relationship when a doctor treats a doctor-patient. Current guidelines make little reference to these dynamics with the over-simplified 'keep it normal' recommendations. Treating doctors need evidence-informed training to navigate these challenges and ensure they can effectively deliver quality care to their doctor-patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39285291
doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02592-1
pii: 10.1186/s12875-024-02592-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
340Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being: Nine Organizational Strategies to Promote Engagement and Reduce Burnout. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(1):129–46.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004
pubmed: 27871627
Kay M, Mitchell G, Clavarino A, Doust J. Doctors as patients: a systematic review of doctors’ health access and the barriers they experience. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58(552):501–8.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319486
pubmed: 18611318
pmcid: 2441513
Morishita M, Iida J, Nishigori H. Doctors’ experience of becoming patients and its influence on their medical practice: A literature review. Explore (NY). 2020;16(3):145–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2019.10.007
pubmed: 31843394
Spiers J, Buszewicz M, Chew-Graham CA, Gerada C, Kessler D, Leggett N, et al. Barriers, facilitators, and survival strategies for GPs seeking treatment for distress: a qualitative study. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2017;67(663):e700–8.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692573
pubmed: 28893766
Klitzman R. When doctors become patients. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Gerada C. Doctors’ identity and barriers to seeking care when unwell. Br J Psychiatry. 2022;220(1):7–9.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.52
pubmed: 35045894
Kay M, Mitchell G, Clavarino A. What doctors want? A consultation method when the patient is a doctor. Aust J Prim Health. 2010;16(1):52–9.
doi: 10.1071/PY09052
pubmed: 21133299
Kay MP. Understanding the health access behaviours of doctors seeking medical care for themselves [dissertation]. Brisbane: University of Queensland; 2012. p. 258p.
British Medical Association. Ethics Toolkit: The doctor-patient relationship. BMA. 2024:36–8.
Medical Board of Australia. Good medical practice: a code of conduct for doctors in Australia. 2020. p. 24. https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Policies/Code-of-conduct.aspx . Accessed June 2023.
Hutton CJ, Kay M, Round P, Barton C. Doctors' experiences when treating doctor-patients: a scoping review. BJGP Open. 2023;7(4).
Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications Inc; 2008.
Siegfried CH. Pragmatism. In: Jagger A, Young I, editors. A Companion to Feminist Philosophy. Blackwell; 2000. p. 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164498.ch5 .
Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications; 2013.
Chun Tie Y, Birks M, Francis K. Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine. 2019;7:1–8.
doi: 10.1177/2050312118822927
Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2015.
Gavinski K, Cleveland E, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Sulisto M. Relationship between confidence, gender, and career choice in internal medicine. Gen Int Med. 2020;36(3):662–7.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06221-2
Teng KA, Butler RS, Schramm S, et al. Physicians caring for physicians: The perspective of the primary care physician. South Med J. 2014;107(5):301–5.
doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0000000000000095
pubmed: 24937729
Malterud K, Siersma V, Guassora A. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.
doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
pubmed: 26613970
Minichello V, Aroni R, Hays T. In-depth interviewing. 3rd ed. Sydney: Pearson Education Australia; 2008.
Morse JM. Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(9):1212–22.
doi: 10.1177/1049732315588501
pubmed: 26184336
Birks M, Mills J. Grounded theory: a practical guide. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2015.
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2014.
Mercer J. The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxf Rev Educ. 2007;33(1):1–17.
doi: 10.1080/03054980601094651
Beyondblue. National Mental Health Survey of Doctors and Medical Students. Available at: https://medicine.uq.edu.au/files/42088/Beyondblue%20Doctors%20Mental%20health.pdf . Accessed 14 Jan 2023.
Jackson PW. Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1968.
Mahood S. Beware the hidden curriculum. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57(September):983–5.
pubmed: 21918135
pmcid: 3173411
Avinger AM, McClary T, Dixon M, Pentz RD. Evaluation of Standard-of-Care Practices Among Physicians Who Treat Other Physicians: A Qualitative Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(10):e2236914-e.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36914
Domeyer-Klenske A, Rosenbaum M. When doctor becomes patient: Challenges and strategies in caring for physician-patients. Fam Med. 2012;44(7):471–7.
pubmed: 22791531
Noble SIR, Nelson A, Finlay IG. Challenges faced by palliative care physicians when caring for doctors with advanced cancer. Palliat Med. 2008;22(1):71–6.
doi: 10.1177/0269216307084607
pubmed: 18216079
White R, Lindt H. Psychological hazards in treating physical disorders of medical colleagues. Dis Nerv Syst. 1963;24(May):304–9.
pubmed: 14000349
Jaye C, Wilson H. When general practitioners become patients. Health (London, England : 1997). 2003;7(2):201–25.
doi: 10.1177/1363459303007002875
Fromme E, Billings JA. Care of the dying doctor: on the other end of the stethoscope. JAMA. 2003;290(15):2048–55.
doi: 10.1001/jama.290.15.2048
pubmed: 14559959
Klitzman R. “Post-residency disease” and the medical self: identity, work, and health care among doctors who become patients. Perspect Biol Med. 2006;49(4):542–52.
doi: 10.1353/pbm.2006.0060
pubmed: 17146139
Fox FE, Taylor GJ, Harris MF, et al. “It’s crucial they’re treated as patients”: ethical guidance and empirical evidence regarding treating doctor–patients. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(1):7–11.
doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.029066
pubmed: 20026686
McKevitt C, Morgan M. Illness doesn’t belong to us. J R Soc Med. 1997;90(9):491–5.
doi: 10.1177/014107689709000907
pubmed: 9370984
pmcid: 1296526
Bynder H. Doctors as Patients: A Study of the Medical Care of Physicians and Their Families. Med Care. 1968;6(2):157–67.
doi: 10.1097/00005650-196803000-00007