A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of the 'Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience' (CPIPE) intervention in Kenya and Ghana: study protocol.
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Sep 2024
16 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
29
04
2024
accepted:
09
09
2024
medline:
17
9
2024
pubmed:
17
9
2024
entrez:
16
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Poor person-centered maternal care (PCMC) contributes to high maternal mortality and morbidity, directly and indirectly, through lack of, delayed, inadequate, unnecessary, or harmful care. While evidence on poor PCMC prevalence, as well as inequities, expanded in the last decade, there is still a significant gap in evidence-based interventions to address PCMC. We describe the protocol for a trial to test the effectiveness of the "Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience" (CPIPE) intervention, which includes five strategies, targeting provider stress and bias as intermediate factors to improve PCMC and address inequities. The trial will assess the effect of CPIPE on PCMC, as well as on intermediate and distal outcomes, using a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial in 40 health facilities in Migori and Homa Bay Counties in Kenya and Upper East and Northeast Regions in Ghana. Twenty facilities in each country will be randomized to 10 intervention and 10 control sites. The primary intervention targets are all healthcare workers who provide maternal health services. The intervention impact will be assessed among healthcare workers in the study health facilities and among women who give birth in the study health facilities. The primary outcome is PCMC measured with the PCMC scale, via multiple cross-sectional surveys of mothers who gave birth in the preceding 12 weeks in study facilities at baseline (prior to the intervention), midline (6 months after intervention start), and endline (12 months post-baseline) (N = 2000 across both countries at each time point). Additionally, 400 providers in the study facilities across both countries will be followed longitudinally at baseline, midline, and endline, to assess intermediate outcomes. The trial incorporates a mixed-methods design; survey data alongside in-depth interviews (IDIs) with healthcare facility leaders, providers, and mothers to qualitatively explore factors influencing the outcomes. Finally, we will collect process and cost data to assess intervention fidelity and cost-effectiveness. This trial will be the first to rigorously assess an intervention to improve PCMC that addresses both provider stress and bias and will advance the evidence base for interventions to improve PCMC and contribute to equity in maternal and neonatal health. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06085105. Protocol version and date: v2-11-07-23.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Poor person-centered maternal care (PCMC) contributes to high maternal mortality and morbidity, directly and indirectly, through lack of, delayed, inadequate, unnecessary, or harmful care. While evidence on poor PCMC prevalence, as well as inequities, expanded in the last decade, there is still a significant gap in evidence-based interventions to address PCMC. We describe the protocol for a trial to test the effectiveness of the "Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience" (CPIPE) intervention, which includes five strategies, targeting provider stress and bias as intermediate factors to improve PCMC and address inequities.
METHODS
METHODS
The trial will assess the effect of CPIPE on PCMC, as well as on intermediate and distal outcomes, using a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial in 40 health facilities in Migori and Homa Bay Counties in Kenya and Upper East and Northeast Regions in Ghana. Twenty facilities in each country will be randomized to 10 intervention and 10 control sites. The primary intervention targets are all healthcare workers who provide maternal health services. The intervention impact will be assessed among healthcare workers in the study health facilities and among women who give birth in the study health facilities. The primary outcome is PCMC measured with the PCMC scale, via multiple cross-sectional surveys of mothers who gave birth in the preceding 12 weeks in study facilities at baseline (prior to the intervention), midline (6 months after intervention start), and endline (12 months post-baseline) (N = 2000 across both countries at each time point). Additionally, 400 providers in the study facilities across both countries will be followed longitudinally at baseline, midline, and endline, to assess intermediate outcomes. The trial incorporates a mixed-methods design; survey data alongside in-depth interviews (IDIs) with healthcare facility leaders, providers, and mothers to qualitatively explore factors influencing the outcomes. Finally, we will collect process and cost data to assess intervention fidelity and cost-effectiveness.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This trial will be the first to rigorously assess an intervention to improve PCMC that addresses both provider stress and bias and will advance the evidence base for interventions to improve PCMC and contribute to equity in maternal and neonatal health.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06085105. Protocol version and date: v2-11-07-23.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39285405
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20023-9
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-20023-9
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT06085105']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Clinical Trial Protocol
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2509Subventions
Organisme : Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
ID : R01 HD110370-02
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-agency Group. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7
pubmed: 26584737
WHO. PMNCH Fact Sheet. Maternal mortality. Published 2011. Accessed July 17, 2013. http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/press_materials/fs/fs_mdg5_maternalmortality/en/index.html
WHO. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. Jt Statement WHO ICM FIGO Geneva. Published online 2004.
Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X .
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X
pubmed: 25103301
UNICEF, Delivery. care: Joint UNICEF/WHO database 2021 of skilled health personnel, based on population based national household survey data and routine health systems. UNICEF DATA. Published 2021. Accessed November 1, 2021. https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/delivery-care/
UNICEF. Delivery care. UNICEF global databases. 2023, based on MICS, DHS and other nationally representative household surveys. UNICEF global databases, 2023, based on MICS, DHS and other nationally representative household surveys. Published 2023. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/delivery-care/
Koblinsky M, Moyer CA, Calvert C et al. Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. The Lancet. Published online September 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31333-2
Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(11):e1196–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3 .
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3
pubmed: 30196093
pmcid: 7734391
Chou VB, Walker N, Kanyangarara M. Estimating the global impact of poor quality of care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in 81 low- and middle-income countries: a modeling study. Persson LÅ. ed PLOS Med. 2019;16(12):e1002990–1002990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002990 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002990
Tunçalp Ӧ, Were W, MacLennan C, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122(8):1045–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13451 .
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13451
Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1988;260(12):1743–8.
doi: 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. 2001. Accessed July 25, 2013. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2001/Crossing-the-Quality-Chasm-A-New-Health-System-for-the-21st-Century.aspx
WHO. Prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during childbirth. WHO. Published 2014. Accessed April 5, 2017. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/maternal_perinatal/statement-childbirth/en/
WHO. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. WHO. Published 2018. Accessed April 1. 2019. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/intrapartum-care-guidelines/en/
WHO. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. WHO. Published 2016. Accessed October 13. 2020. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/anc-positive-pregnancy-experience/en/
White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful Maternity Care: The Universal Rights of Childbearing Women (Full charter). Published 2011. Accessed March 28. 2017. http://www.healthpolicyproject.com/index.cfm?ID=publications&get=pubID&pubID=46
Afulani PA, Kirumbi L, Lyndon A. What makes or mars the facility-based childbirth experience: thematic analysis of women’s childbirth experiences in western Kenya. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0446-7 .
doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0446-7
pubmed: 29284490
pmcid: 5747138
Afulani PA, Phillips B, Aborigo RA, Moyer CA. Person-centred maternity care in low-income and middle-income countries: analysis of data from Kenya, Ghana, and India. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(1):e96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30403-0 .
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30403-0
pubmed: 30554766
Afulani PA, Sayi TS, Montagu D. Predictors of person-centered maternity care: the role of socioeconomic status, empowerment, and facility type. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):360. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3183-x .
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3183-x
pubmed: 29751805
pmcid: 5948900
Afulani PA, Aborigo RA, Walker D, Moyer CA, Cohen S, Williams J. Can an integrated obstetric emergency simulation training improve respectful maternity care? Results from a pilot study in Ghana. Birth Berkeley Calif. Published Online January. 2019;24. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12418 .
Moyer CA, Mustafa A. Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2013;10(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-40 .
doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-40
pubmed: 23962135
pmcid: 3751820
Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-71 .
doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71
pubmed: 25238684
pmcid: 4247708
Andersen HM. Villagers: Differential treatment in a Ghanaian hospital. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:2003–12.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.005
pubmed: 15351468
Atinga RA, Bawole JN, Nang-Beifubah A. Some patients are more equal than others’: patient-centred care differential in two-tier inpatient ward hospitals in Ghana. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(3):370–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.008
pubmed: 26475729
Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570 .
Oliveira VC, Refshauge KM, Ferreira ML, et al. Communication that values patient autonomy is associated with satisfaction with care: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2012;58(4):215–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1836-9553(12)70123-6 .
doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(12)70123-6
pubmed: 23177224
Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. The Cochrane Collaboration, Hodnett ED, eds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published online July 15, 2013. Accessed August 7, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5
Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6 .
Sudhinaraset M, Landrian A, Afulani PA, Diamond-Smith N, Golub G. Association between person-centered maternity care and newborn complications in Kenya. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. Published online September 23, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12978
Sudhinaraset DM, Landrian MA, Golub MGM, Cotter MSY, Afulani DPA. Person-centered maternity care and postnatal health: associations with maternal and newborn health outcomes. AJOG Glob Rep Published Online January. 2021;27:100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100005
Minckas N, Gram L, Smith C, Mannell J. Disrespect and abuse as a predictor of postnatal care utilisation and maternal-newborn well-being: a mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(4):e004698. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004698 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004698
pubmed: 33883187
pmcid: 8061800
Attanasio LB, Ranchoff BL, Paterno MT, Kjerulff KH. Person-Centered Maternity Care and Health Outcomes at 1 and 6 months Postpartum. J Womens Health Published Online September. 2022;2. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2021.0643 .
Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet Published Online September. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6
Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Tunçalp Ö, et al. By slapping their laps, the patient will know that you truly care for her: a qualitative study on social norms and acceptability of the mistreatment of women during childbirth in Abuja, Nigeria. SSM - Popul Health. 2016;2:640–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.07.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.07.003
pubmed: 28345016
pmcid: 5356417
Jewkes R, Abrahams N, Mvo Z. Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:1781–95.
doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00240-8
pubmed: 9877348
Sen G, Reddy B, Iyer A. Beyond measurement: the drivers of disrespect and abuse in obstetric care. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(53):6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1508173 .
doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1508173
pubmed: 30189791
Warren CE, Njue R, Ndwiga C, Abuya T. Manifestations and drivers of mistreatment of women during childbirth in Kenya: implications for measurement and developing interventions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1288-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1288-6
pubmed: 28351350
pmcid: 5371243
Afulani PA, Buback L, Kelly AM, Kirumbi L, Cohen CR, Lyndon A. Providers’ perceptions of communication and women’s autonomy during childbirth: a mixed methods study in Kenya. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0909-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0909-0
pubmed: 32493424
pmcid: 7268432
Buback L, Kinyua J, Akinyi B, Walker D, Afulani PA. Provider perceptions of lack of supportive care during childbirth: a mixed methods study in Kenya. Health Care Women Int. 2021;0(0):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2021.1961776 .
doi: 10.1080/07399332.2021.1961776
Jewkes R, Penn-Kekana L. Mistreatment of women in Childbirth: Time for Action on this important dimension of violence against women. PLOS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001849 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001849
pubmed: 26126175
pmcid: 4488340
Freedman LP, Kruk ME. Disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: challenging the global quality and accountability agendas. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):e42–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60859-X .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60859-X
pubmed: 24965825
Downe S, Lawrie TA, Finlayson K, Oladapo OT. Effectiveness of respectful care policies for women using routine intrapartum services: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0466-y .
doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0466-y
pubmed: 29409519
pmcid: 5801845
Diamond-Smith N, Lin S, Peca E, Walker D. A landscaping review of interventions to promote respectful maternal care in Africa: opportunities to advance innovation and accountability. Midwifery. 2022;115:103488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103488 .
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103488
pubmed: 36191382
Afulani PA, Kelly AM, Buback L, Asunka J, Kirumbi L, Lyndon A. Providers’ perceptions of disrespect and abuse during childbirth: a mixed-methods study in Kenya. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35:577–86.
Afulani PA, Aborigo RA, Nutor JJ, et al. Self-reported provision of person-centered Maternity Care among providers in Kenya and Ghana: Scale Validation and Examination of Associated factors. Social Science Research Network; 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3918862 .
Afulani PA, Ongeri L, Kinyua J, Temmerman M, Mendes WB, Weiss SJ. Psychological and physiological stress and burnout among maternity providers in a rural county in Kenya: individual and situational predictors. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):453. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10453-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10453-0
pubmed: 33676479
pmcid: 7936594
Afulani PA, Oboke EN, Ogolla BA, et al. Caring for providers to improve patient experience (CPIPE): intervention development process. Glob Health Action. 2023;16(1):2147289. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2147289 .
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2147289
pubmed: 36507905
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs. Health Educ Behav. 1988;15(4):351–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401 .
doi: 10.1177/109019818801500401
Glanz K, Rimer KB. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH Pub. No. 97-3896. Washington, DC: NIH.; 1997.
San Francisco Department of Public Health. Trauma Informed Systems Initiative 2014 Year in Review. Published online 2015. http://www.leapsf.org/pdf/Trauma-Informed-Systems-Initative-2014.pdf
Walker DM, Holme F, Zelek ST, et al. A process evaluation of PRONTO simulation training for obstetric and neonatal emergency response teams in Guatemala. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0401-7 .
doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0401-7
pubmed: 26206373
pmcid: 4513701
Afulani PA, Dyer J, Calkins K, Aborigo RA, Mcnally B, Cohen SR. Provider knowledge and perceptions following an integrated simulation training on emergency obstetric and neonatal care and respectful maternity care: a mixed-methods study in Ghana. Midwifery. 2020;85:102667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102667 .
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102667
pubmed: 32114318
Health Policy Project. Kenya County Health Fact Sheets. Published online 2015.
Ghana Health Service. Regional health Directorate-Upper East Region. 2018 Annual Report.
Ghana Health Service. Upper East Regional Profile-2021.
North East Regional Health Directorate. Midyear Performance Review Report 2021.
Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systematic Approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2004. pp. 68–81.
Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40 .
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
pubmed: 18053122
pmcid: 2213686
Breitenstein SM, Gross D, Garvey C, Hill C, Fogg L, Resnick B. Implementation Fidelity in Community-based interventions. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(2):164–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20373 .
doi: 10.1002/nur.20373
pubmed: 20198637
pmcid: 3409469
Afulani PA, Diamond-Smith N, Golub G, Sudhinaraset M. Development of a tool to measure person-centered maternity care in developing settings: validation in a rural and urban Kenyan population. Reprod Health. 2017;14:118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0381-7 .
doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0381-7
pubmed: 28938885
pmcid: 5610540
Afulani PA, Buback L, Essandoh F, Kinyua J, Kirumbi L, Cohen CR. Quality of antenatal care and associated factors in a rural county in Kenya: an assessment of service provision and experience dimensions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4476-4 .
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4476-4
Afulani PA, Altman MR, Castillo E, et al. Development of the person-centered prenatal care scale for people of color. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(4):427e. 1-427.e13.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.216
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96.
doi: 10.2307/2136404
pubmed: 6668417
Gerber M, Colledge F, Mücke M, Schilling R, Brand S, Ludyga S. Psychometric properties of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout measure (SMBM) among adolescents: results from three cross-sectional studies. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1841-5 .
Afulani PA, Gyamerah AO, Nutor JJ, et al. Inadequate preparedness for response to COVID-19 is associated with stress and burnout among healthcare workers in Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(4):e0250294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250294 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250294
pubmed: 33861808
pmcid: 8051822
Bower KM, Kramer MB, Warren N, et al. Development of an instrument to measure awareness and mitigation of Bias in maternal Health Care. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100872 .
Afulani PA, Ogolla BA, Oboke EN, Ongeri L, Weiss SJ, Lyndon A, et al. Understanding disparities in person-centred maternity care: the potential role of provider implicit and explicit bias. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36:298–311.
Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A, Tambs K, Opjordsmoen S, Samuelsen SO. Review of Validation Studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 2001. Accessed January 4, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK68598/
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) - a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42(2):377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inf. 2019;95:103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
Luellen JK, Shadish WR, Clark MH. Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test. Eval Rev. 2005;29(6):530–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X05275596 .
doi: 10.1177/0193841X05275596
pubmed: 16244051
van der Laan MJ. Rose S. Targeted learning: causal inference for observational and experimental data. Springer; 2011.
Enders CK. Applied Missing Data Analysis. Guilford Press; 2010. p. xv.
Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with Missing Data. Wiley; 2019.
Collins LM, Schafer JL, Kam CM. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychol Methods. 2001;6(4):330–51.
doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330
pubmed: 11778676
NCSS PASS 2021 [computer program]. Version 21. Kaysville, Utah: NCSS Statistical Software. 2021. Accessed December 17, 2021. https://www.ncss.com/software/pass/
Afulani PA, Aborigo RA, Nutor JJ, et al. Self-reported provision of person-centred maternity care among providers in Kenya and Ghana: scale validation and examination of associated factors. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(12):e007415. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007415 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007415
pubmed: 34853033
pmcid: 8638154
Crosby RA, Rothenberg R. In STI interventions, size matters. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(2):82–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2003.007625 .
doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.007625
pubmed: 15054164
pmcid: 1744812
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 .
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
pubmed: 3806354
Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18(2):179–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211 .
doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180211
pubmed: 7899572
Boddy CR. Sample size for qualitative research. Qual Mark Res Int J. 2016;19(4):426–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053 .
doi: 10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa .
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Proctor EK, Powell BJ, Baumann AA, Hamilton AM, Santens RL. Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients. Implement Sci. 2012;7:96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-96 .
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-96
pubmed: 23062065
pmcid: 3541090
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
pubmed: 20957426