Practice Patterns of Physicians who Perform Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections.
Caudal epidural steroid injection
chronic pain
epidural steroid injection
interventional pain management
lumbar radiculopathy
sciatica
Journal
Orthopedic reviews
ISSN: 2035-8164
Titre abrégé: Orthop Rev (Pavia)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524779
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
08
08
2024
accepted:
08
08
2024
medline:
17
9
2024
pubmed:
17
9
2024
entrez:
17
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly employed in the management of low back pain and radiculopathy. Despite their widespread use, practice patterns among physicians performing caudal ESIs can vary significantly. This study aims to identify variability in injection techniques utilized by physicians during caudal ESIs, focusing on steroid use, needle selection, and catheter use. This study also looks at major permanent neurological injuries related to caudal ESIs. A survey was distributed to a cohort of physicians who regularly perform ESIs. The survey comprised questions regarding the type of needle primarily used, steroid selection, the use of catheters, and major neurological injuries from caudal ESIs. The respondents included a diverse group of pain management physicians from various specialties and practice settings. The results revealed a predominant preference for the use of particulate steroids (72.41%) when performing caudal ESIs. Additionally, physicians primarily prefer to use spinal needles (72.41%) compared to other needle types. A majority of physicians (65.12%) reported that they never use a catheter when performing caudal ESIs to access higher pathology. Finally, all physician responders (100%) reported that they have never caused a permanent neurological injury when performing a caudal ESI. This survey provides initial data among physicians who perform caudal ESIs. Our results demonstrate the majority of physicians favor using particulate steroids and a spinal needle, with fewer opting to use a catheter during these procedures. There were no reported major permanent neurological injuries, demonstrating that caudal ESIs are a safe interventional option for managing lumbosacral pain complaints.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39286465
doi: 10.52965/001c.123283
pii: 123283
pmc: PMC11405026
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng