Collagen-Based Vascular Closure Device Multicenter Italian Experience in Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Compared With Suture-Mediated Closure Vascular Device.

endovascular aneurysm repair endovascular treatment/therapy hemostasis thoracic endovascular aortic repair vascular closure device

Journal

Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists
ISSN: 1545-1550
Titre abrégé: J Endovasc Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100896915

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 17 9 2024
pubmed: 17 9 2024
entrez: 17 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The Manta Vascular Closure Device is a novel collagen-based vascular closure device that has been designed specifically for closure of large-bore percutaneous arterial accesses. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the immediate and 30-day outcome of Manta at the completion of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The hypothesis is that Manta is not inferior in obtaining hemostasis compared with the Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System device. We recruited all the percutaneous accesses for (T)EVAR performed from January 2021 to April 2023 by all the Italian Divisions of Vascular Surgery using Manta at the time of data collection (May 2023). The primary outcome is to evaluate the incidence of complications at the puncture site after Manta implantation and at 1 month, and compare this with ProGlide. We applied the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) criteria for observational studies. Overall, 524 consecutive femoral accesses for (T)EVAR procedures were collected: 355 in the Manta cohort and 169 in the ProGlide cohort, respectively. The size of the sheath was 17.2±2.7 Fr for Manta, 15.7±2.3 Fr for ProGlide (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, ultrasound-guided access, femoral calcifications, intraoperative, and 30-day complications. Successful arterial closure at groin puncture sites for (T)EVAR using Manta is 90.5% and 93.1% using ProGlide. Freedom for any reintervention for any complication is 95.5% for Manta and 96% for ProGlide. The 2 vascular closure devices have proved to be similar in terms of complications, without any statistically significant difference, although the median size of the sheaths for (T)EVAR was statistically significantly larger when Manta has been used, compared with ProGlide. Manta® is effective in the hemostasis of the access sites following the completion of (T)EVAR in this multicenter, retrospective, case-control study on 524 percutaneous femoral accesses. Compared to the more popular Proglide®, the average size of the introducers in the Manta® group was significantly larger than in the Proglide® group.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39287104
doi: 10.1177/15266028241275804
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15266028241275804

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Marco Panagrosso (M)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sant'Anna and San Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy.
Federico II Polyclinic, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Public Health and Residency Program in Vascular Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Eduardo Cavallo (E)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sant'Anna and San Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy.

Umberto Marcello Bracale (UM)

Federico II Polyclinic, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Public Health and Residency Program in Vascular Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Antonio Peluso (A)

Federico II Polyclinic, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Public Health and Residency Program in Vascular Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Olga Silvestri (O)

Federico II Polyclinic, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Public Health and Residency Program in Vascular Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Francesco Intrieri (F)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy.

Vincenzo Molinari (V)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy.

Antonio Esposito (A)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy.

Santi Trimarchi (S)

Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Maggiore Polyclinic Hospital Ca' Granda IRCCS and Foundation, Milan, Italy.

Alberto Maria Settembrini (AM)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Maggiore Polyclinic Hospital Ca' Granda IRCCS and Foundation, Milan, Italy.

Chiara Lomazzi (C)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Maggiore Polyclinic Hospital Ca' Granda IRCCS and Foundation, Milan, Italy.

Gaetano La Barbera (G)

Division of Vascular Surgery, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Taranto, Italy.

Luciano Carbonari (L)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Riuniti University Hospitals, Ancona, Italy.

Andrea Angelini (A)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Riuniti University Hospitals, Ancona, Italy.

Irene Morelli (I)

Division of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery Department, S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.

Eleonora Centonza (E)

Division of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery Department, S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.

Raffaella Berchiolli (R)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Nicola Troisi (N)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Valentina Scarati (V)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Valerio Artini (V)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Salvatore De Vivo (S)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Pellegrini Hospital, Naples, Italy.

Pietro Volpe (P)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.

Mafalda Massara (M)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy.

Eugenio Martelli (E)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Sant'Anna and San Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy.
Department of General and Specialist Surgery, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Medicine and Surgery School of Medicine, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH