Virtual reality simulation for mastery learning of wrist radiograph technique.

Patient positioning Radiography training Virtual reality Wrist radiography

Journal

Radiography (London, England : 1995)
ISSN: 1532-2831
Titre abrégé: Radiography (Lond)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9604102

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 08 05 2024
revised: 26 08 2024
accepted: 04 09 2024
medline: 17 9 2024
pubmed: 17 9 2024
entrez: 17 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Virtual reality (VR) simulation is a technology that empowers students and radiographers to practice radiography in a virtual environment that resembles real-life clinical scenarios. The purpose of this randomised study was to examine the relationship between clinical specialty and the ability to assess and obtain a lateral wrist radiograph using a VR simulator. Radiographers and radiography students were recruited from the EFRS Research Hub at the 2024 European Congress of Radiology. After completing a background questionnaire, participants entered a VR simulator where they assessed lateral wrist radiographs and, if necessary, attempted a retake. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the relationship between specialties and participants' ability to assess positioning and perform retakes. Rank-biserial correlation estimated the relationship between participants' ability to reposition the VR patient and their VR experience and self-perceived confidence in wrist radiograph positioning. The cohort included 173 participants from 14 specialties across 21 countries. There was a borderline significant trend between clinical specialty and correct positioning assessment (p = 0.052) and between self-perceived confidence in acquiring wrist radiographs and repositioning for a retake (p = 0.052). Neither clinical specialty (p = 0.480) nor previous VR experience (p = 0.409) correlated with ability to reposition for a retake. While results indicated a potential correlation between participants' ability to position a VR patient and both clinical specialty and confidence in wrist radiography, these trends were not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that VR holds promise for radiography training, though further research is necessary to explore the factors that influence performance and learning. The incorporation of VR technology into standard radiography training programs could potentially improve patient outcomes by ensuring that radiography students are more skilled at acquiring quality radiographs prior to their first clinical practice. It should be noted though, that knowledge on positioning criteria and anatomy is an advantage when practicing correct positioning in a VR simulator.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39288469
pii: S1078-8174(24)00219-0
doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.09.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10-16

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

J Jensen (J)

Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Electronic address: Janni.jensen@rsyd.dk.

B R Mussmann (BR)

Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Life Sciences and Health, Radiography, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

M R V Pedersen (MRV)

Department of Radiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Discipline of Medical Imaging & Radiation Therapy, University College Cork, Ireland.

K Brage (K)

Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Radiography Education, University College Lillebelt, Odense Denmark; Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Denmark.

A England (A)

Discipline of Medical Imaging & Radiation Therapy, University College Cork, Ireland.

H Precht (H)

Department of Radiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Discipline of Medical Imaging & Radiation Therapy, University College Cork, Ireland; Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Denmark.

S D Mørup (SD)

Department of Radiology, Lillebelt Hospital, Middelfart, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

M W Kusk (MW)

Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; Imaging Research Initiative Southwest (IRIS), University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.

C N Bollerup (CN)

Vitasim, Odense, Denmark.

S Lysdahlgaard (S)

Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; Imaging Research Initiative Southwest (IRIS), University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.

A V Dietrich (AV)

Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

K E Hansen (KE)

Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

P I Pietersen (PI)

Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH