[Extension of the Use of Gametes in Intra-Conjugal (EUGIC): How to use trans woman' spermatozoa?]

Extension de l’Utilisation de Gamètes en IntraConjugal (EUGIC): quel usage des spermatozoïdes d’une femme trans?
fertility preservation spermatozoa transgender

Journal

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie
ISSN: 2468-7189
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101693805

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 05 04 2024
revised: 22 08 2024
accepted: 27 08 2024
medline: 18 9 2024
pubmed: 18 9 2024
entrez: 17 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

- Objective: The French Law relating to Bioethics allows access to medically assisted reproduction for lesbian couples and single women and has expanded the possibilities for self-preservation of gametes. The question now arises of new uses of gametes of the couple, within couples of two cis women, one cis woman and one transgender woman, or two transgender individuals. The acronym EUGIC (Extension of the Use of Gametes in IntraCouple) allows these new situations to be grouped together, particularly if gametes have already been previously cryopreserved, thus avoiding the need for gamete donation. - Methods: Analysis of the different situations of sperm use from a trans woman using gametes available within the couple rather than gamete donation. - Results: The inconsistency in the use of sperm from a trans woman, the situations already encountered by professionals, the prospects for filiation for a trans woman as well as the issues related to the interest of the unborn child are discussed. - Conclusion-: French law does not fully address the use of a trans woman's spermatozoa to meet the new EUGIC requirements and leads to complex situations for healthcare professionals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39288834
pii: S2468-7189(24)00282-4
doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.08.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

English Abstract Journal Article

Langues

fre

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

Marie Mesnil (M)

IDEP, Faculté Jean Monnet, Droit, économie, gestion, Université Paris Saclay, France.

Laurence Brunet (L)

Institut des sciences juridique et philosophique de La Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 (UMR 8103), France.

Noémie Ranisavljevic (N)

CHU de Montpellier, Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France.

Sophie Brouillet (S)

CHU de Montpellier, Laboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction-CECOS, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France.

Bérengère Ducrocq (B)

CHU de Lille, Institut de Biologie de la Reproduction, CECOS Nord LILLE, CHRU de LILLE, Hôpital Calmette, Lille, France.

Arnaud Reigner (A)

Biologie de la Reproduction, DPI, CECOS, CHU de Nantes, UFR médecine, Université de Nantes, INSERM UMR 1064, France.

Chadi Yazbeck (C)

Institut Médical Reprogynes 134 Av. Victor Hugo, 75116 Paris, France.

Valerica-Gabriela Oancea (VG)

CHU Rennes, Service de Biologie de la Reproduction-CECOS, 35000 Rennes, France.

Catherine Metzler-Guillemain (C)

Assistance-Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Pôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants, Centre Clinico-biologique AMP-CECOS, Marseille, France.

Jeanine Ohl (J)

AMP clinique, CHU de Strasbourg 1 Place de l'Hôpital 67091 Strasbourg Cedex, France.

Hélène Letur (H)

Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction - Hôpital Foch - Suresnes et Service d'AMP et Préservation de la Fertilité- Polyclinique de Navarre - Pau, France.

Florence Eustache (F)

Unité CECOS, groupe hospitalier Paris Seine Saint Denis, site Jean Verdier, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bondy, France.

Célia Ravel (C)

Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail)UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France. Electronic address: celia.ravel@chu-rennes.fr.

Classifications MeSH