Using augmented reality to assess spatial neglect: The Free Exploration Test (FET).

Spatial neglect assessment augmented reality exploration spatial attention stroke

Journal

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS
ISSN: 1469-7661
Titre abrégé: J Int Neuropsychol Soc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9503760

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 18 9 2024
pubmed: 18 9 2024
entrez: 18 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To capture the distortion of exploratory activity typical of patients with spatial neglect, traditional diagnostic methods and new virtual reality applications use confined workspaces that limit patients' exploration behavior to a predefined area. Our aim was to overcome these limitations and enable the recording of patients' biased activity in real, unconfined space. We developed the Free Exploration Test (FET) based on augmented reality technology. Using a live stream via the back camera on a tablet, patients search for a (non-existent) virtual target in their environment, while their exploration movements are recorded for 30 s. We tested 20 neglect patients and 20 healthy participants and compared the performance of the FET with traditional neglect tests. In contrast to controls, neglect patients exhibited a significant rightward bias in exploratory movements. The FET had a high discriminative power (area under the curve = 0.89) and correlated positively with traditional tests of spatial neglect (Letter Cancellation, Bells Test, Copying Task, Line Bisection). An optimal cut-off point of the averaged bias of exploratory activity was at 9.0° on the right; it distinguished neglect patients from controls with 85% sensitivity. FET offers time-efficient (execution time: ∼3 min), easy-to-apply, and gamified assessment of free exploratory activity. It supplements traditional neglect tests, providing unrestricted recording of exploration in the real, unconfined space surrounding the patient.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To capture the distortion of exploratory activity typical of patients with spatial neglect, traditional diagnostic methods and new virtual reality applications use confined workspaces that limit patients' exploration behavior to a predefined area. Our aim was to overcome these limitations and enable the recording of patients' biased activity in real, unconfined space.
METHODS METHODS
We developed the Free Exploration Test (FET) based on augmented reality technology. Using a live stream via the back camera on a tablet, patients search for a (non-existent) virtual target in their environment, while their exploration movements are recorded for 30 s. We tested 20 neglect patients and 20 healthy participants and compared the performance of the FET with traditional neglect tests.
RESULTS RESULTS
In contrast to controls, neglect patients exhibited a significant rightward bias in exploratory movements. The FET had a high discriminative power (area under the curve = 0.89) and correlated positively with traditional tests of spatial neglect (Letter Cancellation, Bells Test, Copying Task, Line Bisection). An optimal cut-off point of the averaged bias of exploratory activity was at 9.0° on the right; it distinguished neglect patients from controls with 85% sensitivity.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
FET offers time-efficient (execution time: ∼3 min), easy-to-apply, and gamified assessment of free exploratory activity. It supplements traditional neglect tests, providing unrestricted recording of exploration in the real, unconfined space surrounding the patient.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39291435
pii: S1355617724000274
doi: 10.1017/S1355617724000274
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

Britta Stammler (B)

Center of Neurology, Division of Neuropsychology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Marian Lambert (M)

XPACE GmbH, Pforzheim, Germany.

Thomas Schuster (T)

XPACE GmbH, Pforzheim, Germany.
Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences, Pforzheim, Germany.

Kathrin Flammer (K)

Flammer & Gläser UXplain GbR, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Hans-Otto Karnath (HO)

Center of Neurology, Division of Neuropsychology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH