Robotic donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation.
AI
Artificial intelligence
Ethical considerations
Future perspective
Innovation
LDLT
Living donor liver transplantation
Outcomes
Robotic donor hepatectomy
Surgical training
Journal
Updates in surgery
ISSN: 2038-3312
Titre abrégé: Updates Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101539818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Sep 2024
18 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
22
04
2024
accepted:
26
06
2024
medline:
18
9
2024
pubmed:
18
9
2024
entrez:
18
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Robotic donor hepatectomy introduces a new era in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), combining advancements in minimally invasive surgery with superior precision and ergonomics. The beginning of LDLT in 1989 aimed to address the scarcity of deceased donor livers, a situation intensified by the technical and ethical challenges associated with this procedure. The integration of robotic systems since 2010s has broadened the scope and impact of liver transplantation, enhancing outcomes significantly for both donors and recipients. This review discusses the significant advancements in robotic surgery, the ongoing challenges such as cost and training needs, and the future toward global standardization and the integration of artificial intelligence. As this technology continues to evolve, it holds the potential to become the new global standard, ensuring safer procedures and enhanced outcomes for patients worldwide.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39292409
doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01932-1
pii: 10.1007/s13304-024-01932-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
Références
Chan SC, Fan ST (2008) Historical perspective of living donor liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol WJG 14(1):15–21
doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.15
pubmed: 18176956
Nadalin S, Bockhorn M, Malagó M, Valentin-Gamazo C, Frilling A, Broelsch CE (2006) Living donor liver transplantation. HPB 8(1):10–21
doi: 10.1080/13651820500465626
pubmed: 18333233
pmcid: 2131378
Broering DC, Wilms C, Bok P, Fischer L, Mueller L, Hillert C et al (2004) Evolution of donor morbidity in living related liver transplantation: a single-center analysis of 165 cases. Ann Surg 240(6):1013–1024
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000146146.97485.6c
pubmed: 15570207
pmcid: 1356517
Cherqui D, Ciria R, Kwon CHD, Kim KH, Broering D, Wakabayashi G et al (2021) Expert consensus guidelines on minimally invasive donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation from innovation to implementation: a joint initiative from the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA). Ann Surg 273(1):96–108
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004475
pubmed: 33332874
Broering DC, Raptis DA, Malago M, Clavien PA, MIOT Collaborative. Revolutionizing organ transplantation with robotic surgery. AnnSurg. In press
Giulianotti PC, Tzvetanov I, Jeon H, Bianco F, Spaggiari M, Oberholzer J et al (2012) Robot-assisted right lobe donor hepatectomy. Transpl Int Off J Eur Soc Organ Transplant 25(1):e5-9
Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, Ho CM, Lee PH, Lai HS et al (2016) Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: a pure, minimally invasive approach. Liver Transplant Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transplant Soc 22(11):1509–1518
Chen PD, Wu CY, Wu YM (2017) Use of robotics in liver donor right hepatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 6(5):292–296
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.17
pubmed: 29152475
pmcid: 5673766
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg Chic Ill 138(7):777–784
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.7.777
Wu CY, Chen PD, Chou WH, Liang JT, Huang CS, Wu YM (2019) Is robotic hepatectomy cost-effective? In view of patient-reported outcomes. Asian J Surg 42(4):543–550
doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.010
pubmed: 30704965
What is da Vinci Robotic Surgery? A Complete Overview [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 19]. Available from: https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/patients/da-vinci-robotic-surgery . Accessed 10 June 2024
Raptis DA, Vashist YK, Kulkarni RK, Alabbad S, Elsheikh Y, Alnemary Y et al. Outcomes of adult right graft living donor liver transplantation utilizing the robotic platform integrated real-time indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography compared to the open approach. AnnSurg. In press
Raptis DA, Elsheikh Y, Alnemary Y, Marquez KAH, Bzeizi K, Alghamdi S et al (2024) Robotic living donor hepatectomy is associated with superior outcomes for both the donor and the recipient compared with laparoscopic or open - A single-center prospective registry study of 3448 cases. Am J Transplant. 7:S1600-6135(24)00293–4. Online ahead of print
Rela M, Rajalingam R, Cherukuru R, Palaniappan K, Kumar SA, Kanagavelu R et al (2023) Experience with establishing a robotic donor hepatectomy program for pediatric liver transplantation. Transplantation 107(12):2554–2560
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004649
pubmed: 37291714
pmcid: 10664781
Choi GH (2022) Right lobe graft (Robot). In: Abstracts of ATW 2022, Seoul, Korea. Seoul, South Korea: ATW
Yang HY, Choi GH (2022) Stepwise development of robotic donor right hepatectomy according to the anatomical variations in the hilum and the graft volume. HPB 1(24):S586–S587
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.05.1277
Rammohan A, Rela M (2021) Robotic donor hepatectomy: are we there yet? World J Gastrointest Surg 13(7):668–677
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.668
pubmed: 34354800
pmcid: 8316848
Chhabra KR, Thumma JR, Varban OA, Dimick JB (2021) Associations between video evaluations of surgical technique and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. JAMA Surg 156(2):e205532
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5532
pubmed: 33325998
Pera M (2017) Variability in surgical practice. An unresolved problem. Cir Esp Engl Ed 95(2):59–61
doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.02.006
Da Vinci X Robotic Surgical System|Intuitive [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci/x . Accessed 10 June 2024.
Schulze M, Elsheikh Y, Boehnert MU, Alnemary Y, Alabbad S, Broering DC (2022) Robotic surgery and liver transplantation: a single-center experience of 501 robotic donor hepatectomies. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int HBPD INT 21(4):334–339
doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.05.006
pubmed: 35613993
Lo CM (2003) Complications and long-term outcome of living liver donors: a survey of 1508 cases in five Asian centers. Transplantation 75(3 Suppl):S12-15
doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000046534.45645.47
pubmed: 12589131
Dew MA, Butt Z, Humar A, DiMartini AF (2017) Long-term medical and psychosocial outcomes in living liver donors. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg 17(4):880–892
doi: 10.1111/ajt.14111
Staubli S, Grover AS, Turner BRH, Raptis DA, Spiro M, Tinguely P et al (2023) Launch of the international living donor liver transplantation outcomes registry. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 8(8):698–699
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00185-1
pubmed: 37356451
Pollok JM, Tinguely P, Berenguer M, Niemann CU, Raptis DA, Spiro M et al (2023) Enhanced recovery for liver transplantation: recommendations from the 2022 International Liver Transplantation Society consensus conference. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 8(1):81–94
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00268-0
pubmed: 36495912
Ho C, Tsakonas E, Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Mierzwinski-Urban M et al (2012) Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery. CADTH Technol Overv 2(2):e2203
pubmed: 23002378
pmcid: 3442615
Kim NR, Han DH, Choi GH, Lee JG, Joo DJ, Kim MS et al (2022) Comparison of surgical outcomes and learning curve for robotic versus laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 1(108):107000
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.107000
Finotti M, D’Amico F, Mulligan D, Testa G (2023) A narrative review of the current and future role of robotic surgery in liver surgery and transplantation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 12(1):56–68
doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-115
pubmed: 36860258
Sridhar AN, Briggs TP, Kelly JD, Nathan S (2017) Training in robotic surgery—an overview. Curr Urol Rep 18(8):58
doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0710-y
pubmed: 28647793
pmcid: 5486586
Spiro MB, Raptis DA, Lentine KL, Cooper M, Waterman AD, Oniscu GC et al. Reinforcing oversight: activity and outcome monitoring in the development of registries post organ transplantation. Transplantation. In press.
Bhat M, Rabindranath M, Chara BS, Simonetto DA (2023) Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in liver transplantation. J Hepatol 78(6):1216–1233
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.01.006
pubmed: 37208107
Khorsandi SE, Hardgrave HJ, Osborn T, Klutts G, Nigh J, Spencer-Cole RT et al (2021) Artificial intelligence in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 53(10):2939–2944
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.09.045
pubmed: 34740449
Nathan J. Forbes [cited 2024 Apr 20]. Four ways artificial intelligence can benefit robotic surgery. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/02/15/four-ways-artificial-intelligence-can-benefit-robotic-surgery/ . Accessed 10 June 2024.
Knudsen JE, Ghaffar U, Ma R, Hung AJ (2024) Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 18(1):102
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01867-0
pubmed: 38427094
pmcid: 10907451
FDA Clears Intuitive Surgical’s Next-Generation Robotic Surgery System [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.mddionline.com/robotics/not-a-moment-too-soon-fda-clears-intuitive-surgical-s-new-robot . Accessed 10 June 2024.
Broering DC, Elsheikh Y, Malago M, Alnemary Y, Alabbad S, Boehnert MU et al (2024) Outcomes of fully robotic recipient living donor liver transplant in relation to the open approach. Transplantation. 14. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005109 . Online ahead of print
Broering DC, Raptis DA, Elsheikh Y (2024) Pioneering fully robotic donor hepatectomy and robotic recipient liver graft implantation—a new horizon in liver transplantation. Int J Surg Lond Engl 110(3):1333
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001031