Cochlear Aqueduct Post-Natal Growth: A Computed Tomography Study.

Anatomy Children Cochlear aqueduct Computed tomography Temporal bone

Journal

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO
ISSN: 1438-7573
Titre abrégé: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100892857

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 02 03 2024
accepted: 10 08 2024
medline: 19 9 2024
pubmed: 19 9 2024
entrez: 18 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The cochlear aqueduct (CA) is a bony canal located at the base of the scala tympani of the cochlea. It connects the inner ear perilymph fluid to the cerebrospinal fluid of the posterior cerebral fossa. Its function is not well understood, as it seems to be patent in only a fraction of adult patients. Indirect observations argue in favor of the CA being more patent in children. To study the CA morphology in children, we performed a retrospective single-center study of 85 high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (hrCT) scans of children with a mean age of 3.23 ± 3.07 years (13 days of life up to 18 years), and compared them with a group of 22 adult hrCT (mean age of 24.01 ± 3.58 years). The CA morphology measurements included its total length, its funnel (wider intracranial portion) length and width and its type (indicating its radiological patency), according to a previously published classification. The dimensions of the CA were significantly smaller in children compared with adults for the axial length (10.37 ± 2.58 versus 14.63 ± 2.40 mm, respectively, p < 0,001) and the funnel length (3.94 ± 1.59 versus 6.01 ± 1.77 mm, respectively, p < 0,001). The funnel width tended to be smaller but the difference was not significant: 3.49 ± 1,33 versus 3.89 ± 1.07 mm, p = 0,22. The repartition of types of CA was also statistically different. The CA appeared to be more identifiable in the children population. Type 1 (CA visible along its entire course) accounted for 42% (36/85) of children and only 5% (1/22) of adults, type 2 (visible in the medial two thirds) for 30% (25/85) versus 31% (7/22), type 3 (not visible completely along the medial two thirds) for 27% (23/85) versus 50% (11/22). Finally, type 4 (undetectable) was found in only 1% (1/85) of children and 14% (3/22) of adults (p < 0,001). Our study showed significant postnatal growth of the length of the CA, which was more rapid before the age of 2, and slowed after 6 years of age. Its width increased less, with children older than 2 years presenting a similar width to adults. The CA was more identifiable in hrCT in children, arguing for a more permeable tract. The number of completely ossified CA was significantly lower in the children population. These findings highlight the differences between the CA morphology in adults and children and raise the question of differences in function. Moreover, these differences may impact the pharmacodynamics of drugs or vectors delivered into the pediatric inner ear. Further studies are required, both on the anatomy of temporal bones and on the function of the CA in children.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39294515
doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00963-0
pii: 10.1007/s10162-024-00963-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

Références

Muren C, Wilbrand H (1986) Anatomic Variations of the Human Cochlear Aqueduct: A Radioanatomic Investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 27:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518602700103
doi: 10.1177/028418518602700103 pubmed: 3962712
Ritter FN, Lawrence M (1965) A histological and experimental study of cochlear aqueduct patency in the adult human. Laryngoscope 75:1224–1233. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-196508000-00002
doi: 10.1288/00005537-196508000-00002 pubmed: 14341779
Palva T, Dammert K (1969) Human cochlear aqueduct. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 246:1+
Gopen Q, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN (1997) Anatomy of the normal human cochlear aqueduct with functional implications. Hear Res 107:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00017-8
doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00017-8 pubmed: 9165342
Thalen E, Wit H, Segenhout H, Albers F (2002) Inner ear pressure changes following square wave intracranial or ear canal pressure manipulation in the same guinea pig. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259:174–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-001-0431-0
doi: 10.1007/s00405-001-0431-0 pubmed: 12064504
Ciuman RR (2009) Communication routes between intracranial spaces and inner ear: function, pathophysiologic importance and relations with inner ear diseases. Am J Otolaryngol 30:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.04.005
doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.04.005 pubmed: 19410125
Marques SR, Bonaldi LV, De Angelis MA, Isotani S, Smith RL (2001) The External Opening of the Cochlear Aqueduct in Infants and Adults. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Nova 11:298–301. https://doi.org/10.1159/000068295
doi: 10.1159/000068295
Engert J, Bauer D, Spahn B, Müller-Graff F-T, Voelker J, Neun T et al (2023) Computed tomographic 3D analysis of the cochlear aqueduct—potential and limitations of clinical imaging. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 143:931–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2294921
doi: 10.1080/00016489.2023.2294921 pubmed: 38127466
Bhimani S, Virapongse C, Sarwar M (1984) High-resolution computed tomographic appearance of normal cochlear aqueduct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 5:715–720
pubmed: 6437173 pmcid: 8333649
Jackler RK, Hwang PH (1993) Enlargement of the cochlear aqueduct: Fact or fiction? Otolaryngol Neck Surg 109:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989310900104
doi: 10.1177/019459989310900104
Tekdemir I, Aslan A, Ersoy M, Karahan ST, Tellioglu C (2000) A Radiologico-Anatomical Comparative Study of the Cochlear Aqueduct. Clin Radiol 55:288–291. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.1999.0371
doi: 10.1053/crad.1999.0371 pubmed: 10767188
Krombach GA, Van Den Boom M, Di Martino E, Schmitz-Rode T, Westhofen M, Prescher A et al (2005) Computed tomography of the inner ear: Size of anatomical structures in the normal temporal bone and in the temporal bone of patients with menière’s disease. Eur Radiol 15:1505–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2750-9
doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2750-9 pubmed: 15824909
Palva T (1970) Cochlear aqueduct in infants. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 70(2):83–94.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00016487009181863
Bachor E, Byahatti S, Karmody CS (1997) The cochlear aqueduct in pediatric temporal bones. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254:S34–S38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02439718
doi: 10.1007/BF02439718 pubmed: 9065622
Nagururu NV, Jung D, Hui F, Pearl MS, Carey JP, Ward BK (2023) Cochlear Aqueduct Morphology in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome. Audiol Res 13:367–377. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13030032
doi: 10.3390/audiolres13030032 pubmed: 37218843 pmcid: 10204506
Migirov L, Kronenberg J (2005) Radiology of the Cochlear Aqueduct. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:863–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940511401110
doi: 10.1177/000348940511401110 pubmed: 16358606
Spoor F, Zonneveld F (1995) Morphometry of the primate bony labyrinth: a new method based on high-resolution computed tomography. J Anat 186(Pt 2):271–286
pubmed: 7649826 pmcid: 1167185
Spoor F, Jeffery N, Zonneveld F (2000) Using diagnostic radiology in human evolutionary studies. J Anat 197(Pt 1):61–76. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19710061.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19710061.x pubmed: 10999271 pmcid: 1468108
Mejdoubi M, Dedouit F, Mokrane F-Z, Telmon N (2016) CT scan imaging of the human fetal labyrinth: case series data throughout gestation. Otol Neurotol 37(5):602–607
Blanc F, Bemelmans A-P, Affortit C, Joséphine C, Puel J-L, Mondain M et al (2022) A Single Cisterna Magna Injection of AAV Leads to Binaural Transduction in Mice. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:783504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.783504
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.783504 pubmed: 35087833 pmcid: 8787364
Mathiesen BK, Miyakoshi LM, Cederroth CR, Tserga E, Versteegh C, Bork PAR, et al (2023) Delivery of gene therapy through a cerebrospinal fluid conduit to rescue hearing in adult mice. Sci Transl Med 15:eabq3916. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abq3916
Ranum PT, Tecedor L, Keiser MS, Chen YH, Leib DE, Liu X et al (2023) Cochlear transduction via cerebrospinal fluid delivery of AAV in non-human primates. Mol Ther 31:609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.12.018
doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.12.018 pubmed: 36610400 pmcid: 10014218
Talaei S, Schnee ME, Aaron KA, Ricci AJ (2019) Dye Tracking Following Posterior Semicircular Canal or Round Window Membrane Injections Suggests a Role for the Cochlea Aqueduct in Modulating Distribution. Front Cell Neurosci 13:471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00471
doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00471 pubmed: 31736710 pmcid: 6833940
Nishimura S, Yanagita N, Inafuku S, Handoh M, Yokoi H, Futatsugi Y et al (1981) A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of the Guinea Pig Cochlear Aqueduct. ORL 43:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000275529
doi: 10.1159/000275529 pubmed: 7219970
Hofman R, Segenhout JM, Albers FWJ, Wit HP (2005) The relationship of the round window membrane to the cochlear aqueduct shown in three-dimensional imaging. Hear Res 209:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2005.06.004
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.06.004 pubmed: 16039079
Akil O, Dyka F, Calvet C, Emptoz A, Lahlou G, Nouaille S et al (2019) Dual AAV-mediated gene therapy restores hearing in a DFNB9 mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817537116
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817537116 pubmed: 31182603 pmcid: 6600920
Zhao X, Liu H, Liu H, Cai R, Wu H (2022) Gene Therapy Restores Auditory Functions in an Adult Vglut3 Knockout Mouse Model. Hum Gene Ther 33:729–739. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2022.062
doi: 10.1089/hum.2022.062 pubmed: 35726398
Alwan M, Hurtado G (2022) Sensorineural hearing loss following lumbar puncture, spinal anaesthesia or epidural anaesthesia: a case series and literature review. J Laryngol Otol 136:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215122000226
doi: 10.1017/S0022215122000226 pubmed: 35081999

Auteurs

Maha Abbas (M)

Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, CHRU Montpellier - Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Jing Wang (J)

Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier (INM), University of Montpellier, INSERM U1298, Montpellier, France.

Nicolas Leboucq (N)

Department of Neuroradiology, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, CHRU Montpellier - Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Michel Mondain (M)

Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, CHRU Montpellier - Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier (INM), University of Montpellier, INSERM U1298, Montpellier, France.

Fabian Blanc (F)

Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, CHRU Montpellier - Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France. blancfm@gmail.com.
Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier (INM), University of Montpellier, INSERM U1298, Montpellier, France. blancfm@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH