Comparison of doses received from non-contrast enhanced brain CT examinations between two CT scanners.

Brain Computed tomography Effective dose Radiation dose

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 07 02 2024
revised: 26 08 2024
accepted: 27 08 2024
medline: 19 9 2024
pubmed: 19 9 2024
entrez: 19 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Medical devices based on X-ray imaging, such as computed tomography, are considered notable sources of artificial radiation. The aim of this study was to compare the computed tomography dose volume index, the dose length product, and the effective dose of the brain non-contrast enhanced examination on two CT scanners to determine the current state in terms of radiation doses, compare doses to the reference values, and possibly optimize the examination. Data from January 2020 to the second half of 2021 were retrospectively obtained by accessing dose reports from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Data were collected and analyzed in Microsoft Excel. The effective dose was estimated using the dose-length product parameter and the normalized conversion factor for a given anatomical region. For statistical analysis, a two-sample The first data set consists of 200 patients (100 and 100 for older and newer CT scanners) regardless of the scan technique; the average CTDI A non-contrast enhanced brain examination scanned with newer CT equipment was associated with a lower radiation burden on the patient.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39295996
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37043
pii: S2405-8440(24)13074-5
pmc: PMC11408143
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e37043

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Veronika Žatkuliaková (V)

Clinic of Radiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia.

Martin Števík (M)

Clinic of Radiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia.

Martin Vorčák (M)

Clinic of Radiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia.

Ján Sýkora (J)

Clinic of Radiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia.

Zuzana Trabalková (Z)

Clinic of Radiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia.

Gabriel Broocks (G)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Lukas Meyer (L)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Jens Fiehler (J)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Kamil Zeleňák (K)

Clinic of Radiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia.

Classifications MeSH