Microplastic pollution in aquafeed of diverse aquaculture animals.

Contaminants Feed size effect Fiber Ingestion risk Polypropylene

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 06 06 2024
revised: 30 08 2024
accepted: 02 09 2024
medline: 19 9 2024
pubmed: 19 9 2024
entrez: 19 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Microplastics have emerged as pervasive contaminants, and determining their occurrence in aquafeed is key for evaluating their risks to farmed animals and, by extension, humans. However, knowledge about microplastic in aquafeed is still limited. Herein, we determined microplastic characteristics in aquafeed for five important aquaculture animals with different feeding habits. Aquafeed samples were collected for spotted sea bass, shrimp, grass carp, Tilapia, and frogs from main companies in China. The samples were digested using chemical digestion, and the residuals were subjected to a density separation. Microplastics were identified under the microscope and characterized by their shape, color, size, and polymer type. The results showed that microplastics are highly abundant in the feed of frogs, followed by spotted sea bass, Tilapia, grass carp, and shrimp. We found that feed size contributes to the total microplastic abundance in the feed. Further, microplastics were mainly in microfiber form, and the dominant polymer type was propylene, suggesting that packaging and processing are the main sources of pollution. Additionally, the most abundant size of microplastics was 100-1000 μm. Calculating microplastic ingestion risk, the spotted sea bass had the greatest recorded risk of microplastic ingestion, followed by grass carp, frogs, Tilapia, and shrimp. This study lays a foundational step toward understanding microplastic effects on aquaculture animals and calls for further environmentally relevant laboratory experiments to assess the risk of microplastic ingestion on animals and potential transfer to humans.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39296156
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37370
pii: S2405-8440(24)13401-9
pmc: PMC11408773
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e37370

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Mohamed Mohsen (M)

Xiamen Key Laboratory for Feed Quality Testing and Safety Evaluation, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, 361021, PR China.
Department of Fish Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo, 11884, Egypt.

Jibin Lin (J)

Xiamen Key Laboratory for Feed Quality Testing and Safety Evaluation, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, 361021, PR China.

Kangle Lu (K)

Xiamen Key Laboratory for Feed Quality Testing and Safety Evaluation, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, 361021, PR China.

Ling Wang (L)

Xiamen Key Laboratory for Feed Quality Testing and Safety Evaluation, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, 361021, PR China.

Chunxiao Zhang (C)

Xiamen Key Laboratory for Feed Quality Testing and Safety Evaluation, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, 361021, PR China.

Classifications MeSH