How safe is lung transplantation in patients of 65 years or older? A single-center retrospective cohort.
Elderly patients
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Lung transplantation
Journal
Respiratory medicine and research
ISSN: 2590-0412
Titre abrégé: Respir Med Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101746324
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Sep 2024
05 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
05
04
2024
revised:
31
08
2024
accepted:
02
09
2024
medline:
20
9
2024
pubmed:
20
9
2024
entrez:
19
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
With increasing experience in high-volume centers, age alone should not be an absolute contra-indication to lung transplantation (LT) but be considered as part of the patient's initial characteristics. The objective of this study is to provide early and long-term outcomes of LT in recipients aged 65 or older, compared with their younger counterparts. This is a retrospective study, including all patients undergoing LT in Bichat Hospital (Paris, France) from January 2014 to March 2019. Two groups were defined depending on the patients' age when they were transplanted: patients older than 65 were defined as the "elderly group" and patients younger than 65 years old were defined as the « younger group ». Primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included 1-year mortality, 1-year FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second), and 5-year overall survival. From September 2014 to March 2019, 22 patients were included in the "elderly group" and 213 were included in the « younger group ». The elderly group had more single LT (SLT) (82% vs. 29%, p < 0.001), with a shorter cold ischemic time (243 min vs. 310 min, p = 0.001) and a lower rate of early humoral rejection (9% vs. 30%, p = 0.045) compared to the younger group. Ninety-day mortality was not significantly different between elderly and younger group (9% vs. 14%, p = 0.95, respectively), nor were 1-year mortality (23% vs. 25%, p = 0.9, respectively) and 5-year overall survival. Six months after LT, FEV1 was significantly better in the elderly group compared to the younger group (77.0% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.037 respectively), but the difference did not reach statistical significance after one year (78.5 vs. 68.3%, p = 0.18 respectively). Elderly patients underwent more frequently single LT, and achieved similar short and long term postoperative outcomes compared to their younger counterparts. LT for patients 65 years or older should be routinely considered when carefully selected.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39299136
pii: S2590-0412(24)00055-2
doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101139
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101139Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.