NursPainPrevent: A Prospective Observational Study on Pain During a Bed Bath.

Acute pain Bed bath Pain Practical nursing Procedural pain

Journal

Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses
ISSN: 1532-8635
Titre abrégé: Pain Manag Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100890606

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 09 08 2023
revised: 15 07 2024
accepted: 15 07 2024
medline: 20 9 2024
pubmed: 20 9 2024
entrez: 19 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Although bed baths are known to cause pain, the engendered pain frequency and intensity remain poorly studied. This prospective, observational study was undertaken to examine prospectively, on a given day, patients' bed bath-associated pain in the general in-hospital population. Eight external investigators observed 166 bed baths given in 23 units in 5 hospitals. Using validated assessment scales specific to the patients' clinical situations, they established pain scores. Expert observers rated bed bath-induced pain as moderate-to-severe for 48% of the patients, among whom 51.9% had not received prophylactic analgesia prior to the procedure. Only 7.2% benefited from evaluation with a validated pain scale. Astute attention-distraction techniques were applied to shift attention during 16.8% of the bed baths. Caregivers used verbal guidance for 85% of the procedures, and adapted touch and rhythm of the gestures for 84.3%. Bed baths generate moderate-to-severe pain intensity. Evaluation and recourse to analgesia remain insufficient despite caregivers' attention accorded to patient comfort and positioning. The results of this study could contribute to sensitizing professionals to preventing pain linked with routine nursing care. Four axes for improvement were highlighted: evaluation improvement, analgesia, nonpharmacological approaches, and adapted mobilization techniques.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although bed baths are known to cause pain, the engendered pain frequency and intensity remain poorly studied. This prospective, observational study was undertaken to examine prospectively, on a given day, patients' bed bath-associated pain in the general in-hospital population.
METHODS METHODS
Eight external investigators observed 166 bed baths given in 23 units in 5 hospitals. Using validated assessment scales specific to the patients' clinical situations, they established pain scores.
RESULTS RESULTS
Expert observers rated bed bath-induced pain as moderate-to-severe for 48% of the patients, among whom 51.9% had not received prophylactic analgesia prior to the procedure. Only 7.2% benefited from evaluation with a validated pain scale. Astute attention-distraction techniques were applied to shift attention during 16.8% of the bed baths. Caregivers used verbal guidance for 85% of the procedures, and adapted touch and rhythm of the gestures for 84.3%.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Bed baths generate moderate-to-severe pain intensity. Evaluation and recourse to analgesia remain insufficient despite caregivers' attention accorded to patient comfort and positioning.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study could contribute to sensitizing professionals to preventing pain linked with routine nursing care. Four axes for improvement were highlighted: evaluation improvement, analgesia, nonpharmacological approaches, and adapted mobilization techniques.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39299848
pii: S1524-9042(24)00223-6
doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.07.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Bénédicte Lombart (B)

Coordination des Soins, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France. Electronic address: benedicte.lombart@aphp.fr.

Patricia Cimerman (P)

Centre National de Ressource de lutte contre la Douleur (CNRD), Hôpital Trousseau, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: patricia.cimerman@orange.fr.

Céline Guiot (C)

Centre d'Evalaution et de Traitement de la Douleur (CETD), Hôpital Trousseau, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: celine.guiot@aphp.fr.

Valérie Gayet (V)

Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: valerie.gayet@aphp.fr.

I Sabelle Sanglier (IS)

Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: isabellesanglier@hotmail.com.

Muriel Sansac (M)

Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: myriam.sansac@hotmail.fr.

Sandrine Avignon (S)

CETD, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: sandrine.avignon@aphp.fr.

Emilie Boulet (E)

Equipe Mobile Douleur et Soins Palliatifs, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: emilie.boulet@aphp.fr.

Florence Lay (F)

CETD, Hôpital Rothschild, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: florence.lay@aphp.fr.

Louise Geoffroy (L)

CETD, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: louise.geoffroy@aphp.fr.

Stéphanie Mauboussin-Carlos (S)

CETD, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: stephanie.mauboussincarlos@aphp.fr.

Christian Guy-Coichard (C)

CETD, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: christian.guy-coichard@aphp.fr.

Etienne Guilly (E)

Hôpital La Roche Guyon, Groupe Hospitalier Sorbonne Université, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: etienne.guilluy@aphp.fr.

Céline Bouchart (C)

Centre d'Evalaution et de Traitement de la Douleur (CETD), Hôpital Trousseau, APHP, Paris, France. Electronic address: celine.bouchart@aphp.fr.

Classifications MeSH