Optimising prostate biopsies and imaging for the future-a review.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Positron emission tomography (PET) Prostate cancer Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Transperineal prostate biopsy

Journal

Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 17 02 2024
revised: 09 08 2024
accepted: 25 08 2024
medline: 20 9 2024
pubmed: 20 9 2024
entrez: 19 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Conventionally, transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) was the main technique used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer since it was first described in 1989 [1]. However, the PROMIS trial showed that this random, nontargeted approach could miss up to 18% of clinically significant cancer (csPCa) [2]. Furthermore, risk of sepsis post TRUS-Bx can be as high as 2.4% [3]. Understanding the demerits of TR-biopsy have led to the introduction of transperineal prostate biopsy (TP-Bx). The incorporation of mpMRI revolutionized prostate cancer diagnostics, allowing visualization of areas likely to harbor csPCa whilst permitting some men to avoid an immediate biopsy. Furthermore, the advent of prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is highly promising, because of its role in primary diagnosis of prostate cancer and its higher diagnostic accuracy over conventional imaging in detecting nodal and metastatic lesions. Our narrative review provides an overview on prostate biopsy techniques and an update on prostate imaging, with particular focus on PSMA-PET.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39299895
pii: S1078-1439(24)00637-9
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.08.019
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Kimberley Chan (K)

Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Center, Lister Hospital, Stevenage. Electronic address: Kimberley.chan@nhs.net.

Drkhairul Asri Mohammad Ghani (DAM)

Department of Urology, UPM, Malaysia.

Jeremy Teoh (J)

Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Andrew Brodie (A)

Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Center, Lister Hospital, Stevenage.

Christine Gan (C)

Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Center, Lister Hospital, Stevenage.

Charlotte Foley (C)

Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Center, Lister Hospital, Stevenage.

Prokar Dasgupta (P)

Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Nikhil Vasdev (N)

Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Center, Lister Hospital, Stevenage; School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.

Classifications MeSH