Maintenance infusion rate of oxytocin after initial 1-IU bolus for elective Cesarean delivery: a dose-finding study.
Taux de perfusion d’ocytocine d’entretien après bolus initial de 1 UI pour l’accouchement par césarienne programmée : une étude de détermination de la dose.
Cesarean delivery
maintenance infusion
oxytocin
Journal
Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie
ISSN: 1496-8975
Titre abrégé: Can J Anaesth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8701709
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Sep 2024
19 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
01
11
2023
accepted:
22
04
2024
revised:
22
04
2024
medline:
20
9
2024
pubmed:
20
9
2024
entrez:
19
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The purpose of our study was to determine the minimum effective dose of oxytocin maintenance infusion required to maintain adequate uterine tone in 90% of patients (ED We conducted a prospective, double-blind dose-finding study with biased coin up-down design. Immediately after delivery, a 1-IU oxytocin bolus was administered, followed by a maintenance infusion. The obstetrician assessed the uterine tone by palpation as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. In case of unsatisfactory response, the dose for the next patient was increased by 2 IU·hr We analyzed data for 40 patients. The ED Based on the results of this dose-finding study, we recommend a maintenance infusion rate of 4.5 IU·hr ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04946006 ); first submitted 25 June 2021. RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L’objectif de notre étude était de déterminer la dose minimale efficace de perfusion d’entretien d’ocytocine nécessaire pour maintenir un tonus utérin adéquat chez 90 % des personnes parturientes (DE
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(fre)
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L’objectif de notre étude était de déterminer la dose minimale efficace de perfusion d’entretien d’ocytocine nécessaire pour maintenir un tonus utérin adéquat chez 90 % des personnes parturientes (DE
Identifiants
pubmed: 39300008
doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02828-9
pii: 10.1007/s12630-024-02828-9
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04946006']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.
Références
AbouZahr C. Global burden of maternal death and disability. Br Med Bull 2003; 67: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg015
doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg015
pubmed: 14711750
Leduc D, Senikas V, Lalonde AB, et al. Active management of the third stage of labour: prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 108: 258–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.002
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.002
Peters NC, Duvekot JJ. Carbetocin for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009; 64: 129–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0b013e3181932e5b
doi: 10.1097/ogx.0b013e3181932e5b
pubmed: 19159497
Tom N, Assinder SJ. Oxytocin in health and disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010; 42: 202–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2009.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.10.008
pubmed: 19840865
Heesen M, Carvalho B, Carvalho JC, et al. International consensus statement on the use of uterotonic agents during Cesarean section. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 1305–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14757
doi: 10.1111/anae.14757
pubmed: 31347151
George RB, McKeen D, Chaplin AC, McLeod L. Up-down determination of the ED
doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9297-1
pubmed: 20238255
Lavoie A, McCarthy RJ, Wong CA. The ED
doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000000781
pubmed: 25902327
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: e168–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002351
Leduc D, Senikas V, Lalonde AB. No. 235-active management of the third stage of labour: prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynecol Can 2018; 40: e841–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.09.024
Butwick AJ, Coleman L, Cohen SE, Riley ET, Carvalho B. Minimum effective bolus dose of oxytocin during elective Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 338–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq004
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq004
pubmed: 20150347
Carvalho JC, Balki M, Kingdom J, Windrim R. Oxytocin requirements at elective Cesarean delivery: a dose-finding study. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1005–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000142709.04450.bd
doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000142709.04450.bd
pubmed: 15516392
Qian XW, Drzymalski DM, Lv CC, Guo FH, Wang LY, Chen XZ. The ED
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2692-x
pubmed: 31892352
pmcid: 6937915
Ivanova A, Flournoy N. Group up-and-down designs in toxicity studies. In: Chevret S (Ed.). Statistical Methods for Dose-Finding Experiments. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2006: 115–30.
doi: 10.1002/0470861258.ch5
Gross JB. Estimating allowable blood loss: corrected for dilution. Anesthesiology 1983; 58: 277–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198303000-00016
doi: 10.1097/00000542-198303000-00016
pubmed: 6829965
Stylianou M, Flournoy N. Dose finding using the biased coin up-and-down design and isotonic regression. Biometrics 2002; 58: 171–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00171.x
doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00171.x
pubmed: 11890313
Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a précis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 144–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a
doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a
pubmed: 17585226
Oron AP, Flournoy N. Centered isotonic regression: point and interval estimation for dose-response studies. Stat Biopharm Res 2017; 9: 258–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2017.1286256
doi: 10.1080/19466315.2017.1286256
Sheehan SR, Montgomery AA, Carey M, et al. Oxytocin bolus versus oxytocin bolus and infusion for control of blood loss at elective Cesarean section: double blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial. BMJ 2011; 343: d4661. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4661
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4661
pubmed: 21807773
pmcid: 3148015
Murphy DJ, MacGregor H, Munishankar B, McLeod G. A randomised controlled trial of oxytocin 5IU and placebo infusion versus oxytocin 5IU and 30IU infusion for the control of blood loss at elective caesarean section—pilot study. ISRCTN 40302163. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 142: 30–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.09.004
Duffield A, McKenzie C, Carvalho B, et al. Effect of a high-rate versus a low-rate oxytocin infusion for maintaining uterine contractility during elective Cesarean delivery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 857–62. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000001658
doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001658
pubmed: 28212181
pmcid: 5319709
Fils JF, Kapessidou P, Van der Linden P, Guntz E. A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing the up and down, biased-coin up and down and continual reassessment methods used to estimate an effective dose (ED
doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100225
pubmed: 37790993
pmcid: 10542596
Doctorvaladan SV, Jelks AT, Hsieh EW, Thurer RL, Zakowski MI, Lagrew DC. Accuracy of blood loss measurement during Cesarean delivery. AJP Rep 2017; 7: e93–100. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1601382
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601382
pubmed: 28497007
pmcid: 5425292