The effects of emotional arousal on pupil size depend on luminance.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 09 2024
19 09 2024
Historique:
received:
26
01
2024
accepted:
22
08
2024
medline:
20
9
2024
pubmed:
20
9
2024
entrez:
19
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pupillometry is widely used to measure arousal states. The primary functional role of the pupil, however, is to respond to the luminance of visual inputs. We previously demonstrated that cognitive effort-related arousal interacted multiplicatively with luminance, with the strongest pupillary effects of arousal occurring at low-to-mid luminances (< 37 cd/m
Identifiants
pubmed: 39300137
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70895-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-70895-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21895Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : F31EY033650
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : EY028163
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Kahneman, D., Beatty, J. & Pollack, I. Perceptual deficit during a mental task. Science 157(3785), 218–219 (1967).
pubmed: 17806274
doi: 10.1126/science.157.3785.218
Cohen Hoffing, R. A. et al. Dissociable mappings of tonic and phasic pupillary features onto cognitive processes involved in mental arithmetic. PLoS One 15(3), e0230517 (2020).
pubmed: 32203562
pmcid: 7089555
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230517
Reimer, J. et al. Pupil fluctuations track rapid changes in adrenergic and cholinergic activity in cortex. Nat. Commun. 7, 13289 (2016).
pubmed: 27824036
pmcid: 5105162
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13289
McGinley, M. J. et al. Waking state: Rapid variations modulate neural and behavioral responses. Neuron 87(6), 1143–1161 (2015).
pubmed: 26402600
pmcid: 4718218
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.012
Vinck, M. et al. Arousal and locomotion make distinct contributions to cortical activity patterns and visual encoding. Neuron 86(3), 740–754 (2015).
pubmed: 25892300
pmcid: 4425590
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.028
Kahneman, D. & Beatty, J. Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science 154(3756), 1583–1585 (1966).
pubmed: 5924930
doi: 10.1126/science.154.3756.1583
Binda, P. & Murray, S. O. Spatial attention increases the pupillary response to light changes. J. Vis. 15(2), 1 (2015).
pubmed: 25645434
doi: 10.1167/15.2.1
Unsworth, N. & Robison, M. K. Pupillary correlates of lapses of sustained attention. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 16(4), 601–615 (2016).
pubmed: 27038165
doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0417-4
Partala, T. & Surakka, V. Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59, 185–198 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00017-X
Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M. and Cuthbert, B.N. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8 (University of Florida, 2008).
Zeelenberg, M. Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 12(2), 93–106 (1999).
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<93::AID-BDM311>3.0.CO;2-S
Wichary, S., Mata, R. & Rieskamp, J. Probabilistic inferences under emotional stress: How arousal affects decision processes. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 29(5), 525–538 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/bdm.1896
Niikuni, K. et al. Pupil dilation reflects emotional arousal via poetic language. Percept. Mot. Skills 129(6), 1691–1708 (2022).
pubmed: 36151717
pmcid: 9947723
doi: 10.1177/00315125221126778
Nassar, M. R. et al. Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems. Nat. Neurosci. 15(7), 1040–1046 (2012).
pubmed: 22660479
pmcid: 3386464
doi: 10.1038/nn.3130
Peysakhovich, V. et al. Frequency analysis of a task-evoked pupillary response: Luminance-independent measure of mental effort. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 97(1), 30–37 (2015).
pubmed: 25941013
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.04.019
Pfleging, B. et al. A model relating pupil diameter to mental workload and lighting conditions. In Proc. of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 5776–5788 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2016).
Cherng, Y. G. et al. Background luminance effects on pupil size associated with emotion and saccade preparation. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 15718 (2020).
pubmed: 32973283
pmcid: 7515892
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72954-z
Pan, J. et al. Arousal-based pupil modulation is dictated by luminance. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 1390 (2022).
pubmed: 35082319
pmcid: 8792027
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05280-1
Steinhauer, S. R. et al. Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 52(1), 77–86 (2004).
pubmed: 15003374
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.005
Peysakhovich, V., Vachon, F. & Dehais, F. The impact of luminance on tonic and phasic pupillary responses to sustained cognitive load. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 112, 40–45 (2017).
pubmed: 27979740
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.12.003
Bradshaw, J. L. Brightness of the dominant field, and pupillary reflexes in retinal rivalry. Br. J. Psychol. 60(3), 351–356 (1969).
pubmed: 5811234
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01206.x
Reilly, J. et al. The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in pupillometry. Behav. Res. Methods 51(2), 865–878 (2019).
pubmed: 30264368
doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1134-4
Steinhauer, S. R., Condray, R. & Kasparek, A. Cognitive modulation of midbrain function: task-induced reduction of the pupillary light reflex. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 39(1), 21–30 (2000).
pubmed: 11120344
doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00119-7
Bradley, M. M. et al. The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology 45(4), 602–607 (2008).
pubmed: 18282202
pmcid: 3612940
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x
McDougal, D. H. & Gamlin, P. D. Autonomic control of the eye. Compr. Physiol. 5(1), 439–473 (2015).
pubmed: 25589275
pmcid: 4919817
Bradley, M.M. and Lang, P.J. The International Affective Digitized Sounds (2nd Edition; IADS-2): Affective ratings of sounds and instruction manual. Technical report B-3 (University of Florida, 2007).
Yang, W. et al. Affective auditory stimulus database: An expanded version of the international affective digitized sounds (IADS-E). Behav. Res. Methods 50(4), 1415–1429 (2018).
pubmed: 29520632
doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1027-6
Bradley, M. M., Sapigao, R. G. & Lang, P. J. Sympathetic ANS modulation of pupil diameter in emotional scene perception: Effects of hedonic content, brightness, and contrast. Psychophysiology 54(10), 1419–1435 (2017).
pubmed: 28481033
pmcid: 5597452
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12890
Nakakoga, S. et al. Pupillary response reflects attentional modulation to sound after emotional arousal. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 17264 (2021).
pubmed: 34446768
pmcid: 8390645
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96643-7
Nakakoga, S. et al. Asymmetrical characteristics of emotional responses to pictures and sounds: Evidence from pupillometry. PLoS One 15(4), e0230775 (2020).
pubmed: 32251474
pmcid: 7135059
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230775
Vasquez-Rosati, A. et al. Pupillary response to negative emotional stimuli is differentially affected in meditation practitioners. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 209 (2017).
pubmed: 28515685
pmcid: 5413546
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00209
Snowden, R. J. et al. The pupil’s response to affective pictures: Role of image duration, habituation, and viewing mode. Psychophysiology 53(8), 1217–1223 (2016).
pubmed: 27172997
pmcid: 5031225
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12668
Ferrari, V. et al. Novelty and emotion: Pupillary and cortical responses during viewing of natural scenes. Biol. Psychol. 113, 75–82 (2016).
pubmed: 26631353
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.11.008
van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. & Hommel, B. Threat but not arousal narrows attention: Evidence from pupil dilation and saccade control. Front. Psychol. 2, 281 (2011).
pubmed: 22059081
pmcid: 3204575
Brainard, D. H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10(4), 433–436 (1997).
pubmed: 9176952
doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
Pelli, D. G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10(4), 437–442 (1997).
pubmed: 9176953
doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
Kleiner, M., Brainard, D. H. & Pelli, D. What’s new in psychtoolbox-3?. Perception 36, 1–16 (2007).
Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994).
pubmed: 7962581
doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
Lang, P. J. Behavioral Treatment and Bio-Behavioral Assessment: Computer Applications 119–137 (Ablex: Norwood, 1980).
Willenbockel, V. et al. Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox. Behav. Res. Methods 42(3), 671–684 (2010).
pubmed: 20805589
doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.671
Dal Ben, R. SHINE_color: Controlling low-level properties of colorful images. MethodsX 11, 102377 (2021).
Hayes, T. R. & Petrov, A. A. Mapping and correcting the influence of gaze position on pupil size measurements. Behav. Res. Methods 48(2), 510–527 (2016).
pubmed: 25953668
pmcid: 4637269
doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0588-x
Mathôt, S., A simple way to reconstruct pupil size during eye blinks (2013).
Barbur, J. Learning from the Pupil: Studies of Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Applications Vol. 1, 641–656 (The MIT Press, 2004).
Wang, C. A. et al. Arousal effects on pupil size, heart rate, and skin conductance in an emotional face task. Front. Neurol. 9, 1029 (2018).
pubmed: 30559707
pmcid: 6287044
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01029
Braithwaite, J. J. et al. Guide for Analysing Electrodermal Activity & Skin Conductance Responses for Psychological Experiments. CTIT tech. rep. seri. (2013).
Watson, A. B. & Yellott, J. I. A unified formula for light-adapted pupil size. J. Vis. 12(10), 12 (2012).
pubmed: 23012448
doi: 10.1167/12.10.12
Naka, K. I. & Rushton, W. A. S-potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J. Physiol. 185(3), 587–599 (1966).
pubmed: 5918060
pmcid: 1395832
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008003
Clarke, R. J., Zhang, H. & Gamlin, P. D. R. Characteristics of the pupillary light reflex in the alert rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 89(6), 3179–3189 (2003).
pubmed: 12611973
doi: 10.1152/jn.01131.2002
Mataix-Cols, D. et al. Individual differences in disgust sensitivity modulate neural responses to aversive/disgusting stimuli. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27(11), 3050–3058 (2008).
pubmed: 18588543
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06311.x
Cacioppo, J. T. et al. In the eye of the beholder: Individual differences in perceived social isolation predict regional brain activation to social stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21(1), 83–92 (2009).
pubmed: 18476760
pmcid: 2810252
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21007
Saxena, A. et al. Individual differences in hedonic capacity, depressed mood, and affective states predict emotional reactivity. Motiv. Emot. 41(3), 419–429 (2017).
pubmed: 32461705
pmcid: 7252228
doi: 10.1007/s11031-017-9610-1