Deceased Organ Donor HTLV Screening Practices Postelimination of Universal Screening in the United States.


Journal

Transplantation direct
ISSN: 2373-8731
Titre abrégé: Transplant Direct
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101651609

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 08 05 2024
revised: 12 07 2024
accepted: 16 07 2024
medline: 20 9 2024
pubmed: 20 9 2024
entrez: 20 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the United States, universal screening for human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) in deceased organ donors was discontinued in 2009. Since then, the transplant guideline suggests considering targeted screening. However, the outcomes of this change in HTLV screening have not been evaluated. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database between 2010 and 2022, we analyzed the HTLV antibody screening frequency and seroprevalence in potential deceased organ donors and their correlations with HTLV infection risks, including race and high-risk behaviors for blood-borne pathogen infection. Although targeted screening has not been established for HTLV, we hypothesized that screening rates should correlate with the proportions of donors with infection risk if screening is targeted. We also evaluated the organ utilization of HTLV-seropositive donors. Of 130 284 potential organ donors, 22 032 (16.9%) were tested for HTLV antibody. The proportion of donors tested for HTLV varied between Organ Procurement Organizations (median [interquartile range], 3.8% [1.0%-23.2%]; range, 0.2%-99.4%) and was not correlated to HTLV infection risks. There were 48 seropositive donors (0.22%), and at least 1 organ from 42 of these donors (87.5%) was transplanted. The number of organs recovered and transplanted per donor was significantly lower in HTLV-seropositive than in HTLV-negative donors (recovered, 2 [2-3] versus 3 [3-5], HTLV screening practices varied across the United States. Our findings suggest that targeted screening was not performed after the elimination of universal screening.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
In the United States, universal screening for human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) in deceased organ donors was discontinued in 2009. Since then, the transplant guideline suggests considering targeted screening. However, the outcomes of this change in HTLV screening have not been evaluated.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database between 2010 and 2022, we analyzed the HTLV antibody screening frequency and seroprevalence in potential deceased organ donors and their correlations with HTLV infection risks, including race and high-risk behaviors for blood-borne pathogen infection. Although targeted screening has not been established for HTLV, we hypothesized that screening rates should correlate with the proportions of donors with infection risk if screening is targeted. We also evaluated the organ utilization of HTLV-seropositive donors.
Results UNASSIGNED
Of 130 284 potential organ donors, 22 032 (16.9%) were tested for HTLV antibody. The proportion of donors tested for HTLV varied between Organ Procurement Organizations (median [interquartile range], 3.8% [1.0%-23.2%]; range, 0.2%-99.4%) and was not correlated to HTLV infection risks. There were 48 seropositive donors (0.22%), and at least 1 organ from 42 of these donors (87.5%) was transplanted. The number of organs recovered and transplanted per donor was significantly lower in HTLV-seropositive than in HTLV-negative donors (recovered, 2 [2-3] versus 3 [3-5],
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
HTLV screening practices varied across the United States. Our findings suggest that targeted screening was not performed after the elimination of universal screening.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39301558
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001707
pii: TXD-2024-0113
pmc: PMC11410323
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e1707

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Junji Yamauchi (J)

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Department of Rare Diseases Research, Institute of Medical Science, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.

Divya Raghavan (D)

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Hannah Imlay (H)

Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Duha Jweehan (D)

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Suayp Oygen (S)

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Silviana Marineci (S)

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Adam Remport (A)

Department of Transplantation, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Isaac E Hall (IE)

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Miklos Z Molnar (MZ)

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Classifications MeSH