A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Biochemical Outcome After PSMA-PET-Guided Salvage Radiotherapy in Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Retrospective Study.

AI ML PET PSMA-PET algorithm algorithms artificial intelligence cancer deep learning machine learning metastases oncologist positron emission tomography practical model practical models predictive analytics predictive model predictive models predictive system prostate prostate cancer prostate-specific membrane antigen prostate-specific membrane antigen–positron emission tomography prostatectomy radiography radiology radiotherapy salvage radiotherapy

Journal

JMIR cancer
ISSN: 2369-1999
Titre abrégé: JMIR Cancer
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666844

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 08 05 2024
accepted: 07 08 2024
revised: 06 07 2024
medline: 20 9 2024
pubmed: 20 9 2024
entrez: 20 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Salvage radiation therapy (sRT) is often the sole curative option in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. After sRT, we developed and validated a nomogram to predict freedom from biochemical failure. This study aims to evaluate prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)-based sRT efficacy for postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence or recurrence. Objectives include developing a random survival forest (RSF) model for predicting biochemical failure, comparing it with a Cox model, and assessing predictive accuracy over time. Multinational cohort data will validate the model's performance, aiming to improve clinical management of recurrent prostate cancer. This multicenter retrospective study collected data from 13 medical facilities across 5 countries: Germany, Cyprus, Australia, Italy, and Switzerland. A total of 1029 patients who underwent sRT following PSMA-PET-based assessment for PSA persistence or recurrence were included. Patients were treated between July 2013 and June 2020, with clinical decisions guided by PSMA-PET results and contemporary standards. The primary end point was freedom from biochemical failure, defined as 2 consecutive PSA rises >0.2 ng/mL after treatment. Data were divided into training (708 patients), testing (271 patients), and external validation (50 patients) sets for machine learning algorithm development and validation. RSF models were used, with 1000 trees per model, optimizing predictive performance using the Harrell concordance index and Brier score. Statistical analysis used R Statistical Software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing), and ethical approval was obtained from participating institutions. Baseline characteristics of 1029 patients undergoing sRT PSMA-PET-based assessment were analyzed. The median age at sRT was 70 (IQR 64-74) years. PSMA-PET scans revealed local recurrences in 43.9% (430/979) and nodal recurrences in 27.2% (266/979) of patients. Treatment included dose-escalated sRT to pelvic lymphatics in 35.6% (349/979) of cases. The external outlier validation set showed distinct features, including higher rates of positive lymph nodes (47/50, 94% vs 266/979, 27.2% in the learning cohort) and lower delivered sRT doses (<66 Gy in 57/979, 5.8% vs 46/50, 92% of patients; P<.001). The RSF model, validated internally and externally, demonstrated robust predictive performance (Harrell C-index range: 0.54-0.91) across training and validation datasets, outperforming a previously published nomogram. The developed RSF model demonstrates enhanced predictive accuracy, potentially improving patient outcomes and assisting clinicians in making treatment decisions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Salvage radiation therapy (sRT) is often the sole curative option in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. After sRT, we developed and validated a nomogram to predict freedom from biochemical failure.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to evaluate prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)-based sRT efficacy for postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence or recurrence. Objectives include developing a random survival forest (RSF) model for predicting biochemical failure, comparing it with a Cox model, and assessing predictive accuracy over time. Multinational cohort data will validate the model's performance, aiming to improve clinical management of recurrent prostate cancer.
METHODS METHODS
This multicenter retrospective study collected data from 13 medical facilities across 5 countries: Germany, Cyprus, Australia, Italy, and Switzerland. A total of 1029 patients who underwent sRT following PSMA-PET-based assessment for PSA persistence or recurrence were included. Patients were treated between July 2013 and June 2020, with clinical decisions guided by PSMA-PET results and contemporary standards. The primary end point was freedom from biochemical failure, defined as 2 consecutive PSA rises >0.2 ng/mL after treatment. Data were divided into training (708 patients), testing (271 patients), and external validation (50 patients) sets for machine learning algorithm development and validation. RSF models were used, with 1000 trees per model, optimizing predictive performance using the Harrell concordance index and Brier score. Statistical analysis used R Statistical Software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing), and ethical approval was obtained from participating institutions.
RESULTS RESULTS
Baseline characteristics of 1029 patients undergoing sRT PSMA-PET-based assessment were analyzed. The median age at sRT was 70 (IQR 64-74) years. PSMA-PET scans revealed local recurrences in 43.9% (430/979) and nodal recurrences in 27.2% (266/979) of patients. Treatment included dose-escalated sRT to pelvic lymphatics in 35.6% (349/979) of cases. The external outlier validation set showed distinct features, including higher rates of positive lymph nodes (47/50, 94% vs 266/979, 27.2% in the learning cohort) and lower delivered sRT doses (<66 Gy in 57/979, 5.8% vs 46/50, 92% of patients; P<.001). The RSF model, validated internally and externally, demonstrated robust predictive performance (Harrell C-index range: 0.54-0.91) across training and validation datasets, outperforming a previously published nomogram.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The developed RSF model demonstrates enhanced predictive accuracy, potentially improving patient outcomes and assisting clinicians in making treatment decisions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39303279
pii: v10i1e60323
doi: 10.2196/60323
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77
Antigens, Surface 0
FOLH1 protein, human EC 3.4.17.21
Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II EC 3.4.17.21

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e60323

Informations de copyright

©Ali Janbain, Andrea Farolfi, Armelle Guenegou-Arnoux, Louis Romengas, Sophia Scharl, Stefano Fanti, Francesca Serani, Jan C Peeken, Sandrine Katsahian, Iosif Strouthos, Konstantinos Ferentinos, Stefan A Koerber, Marco E Vogel, Stephanie E Combs, Alexis Vrachimis, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, Simon KB Spohn, Anca-Ligia Grosu, Francesco Ceci, Christoph Henkenberens, Stephanie GC Kroeze, Matthias Guckenberger, Claus Belka, Peter Bartenstein, George Hruby, Louise Emmett, Ali Afshar Omerieh, Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann, Lucas Mose, Daniel M Aebersold, Constantinos Zamboglou, Thomas Wiegel, Mohamed Shelan. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 20.09.2024.

Auteurs

Ali Janbain (A)

European Hospital Georges-Pompidou., Clinical research unit, INSERM Clinical Investigation Center., Paris Cité University, Paris, France.

Andrea Farolfi (A)

Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Armelle Guenegou-Arnoux (A)

European Hospital Georges-Pompidou., Clinical research unit, INSERM Clinical Investigation Center., Paris Cité University, Paris, France.

Louis Romengas (L)

European Hospital Georges-Pompidou., Clinical research unit, INSERM Clinical Investigation Center., Paris Cité University, Paris, France.

Sophia Scharl (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Stefano Fanti (S)

Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Francesca Serani (F)

Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Jan C Peeken (JC)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.

Sandrine Katsahian (S)

European Hospital Georges-Pompidou., Clinical research unit, INSERM Clinical Investigation Center., Paris Cité University, Paris, France.

Iosif Strouthos (I)

Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.

Konstantinos Ferentinos (K)

Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.

Stefan A Koerber (SA)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Marco E Vogel (ME)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.

Stephanie E Combs (SE)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.

Alexis Vrachimis (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.

Alessio Giuseppe Morganti (AG)

Division of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Simon Kb Spohn (SK)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Anca-Ligia Grosu (AL)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Francesco Ceci (F)

Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Christoph Henkenberens (C)

Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

Stephanie Gc Kroeze (SG)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Matthias Guckenberger (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Claus Belka (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Peter Bartenstein (P)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

George Hruby (G)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital-University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Louise Emmett (L)

Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Ali Afshar Omerieh (AA)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann (NS)

Department of Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

Lucas Mose (L)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Daniel M Aebersold (DM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Constantinos Zamboglou (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.

Thomas Wiegel (T)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Mohamed Shelan (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH