Inpatient Outcomes of Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation With Surgical Rib Fixation.

INCA Intercostal nerve cryoablation Regional analgesia SSRF Surgical stabilization of rib fractures

Journal

The Journal of surgical research
ISSN: 1095-8673
Titre abrégé: J Surg Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376340

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 20 05 2024
revised: 29 07 2024
accepted: 17 08 2024
medline: 21 9 2024
pubmed: 21 9 2024
entrez: 20 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Rib fractures are associated with significant pain and morbidity. Intercostal nerve cryoablation (INCA) offers targeted, prolonged pain relief for these patients. Over the last decade, more patients have undergone surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) after injury. However, data on INCA use in SSRF patients are limited. This study aimed to identify the relationship of INCA in blunt trauma patients (BTPs) undergoing SSRF, hypothesizing INCA coupled with SSRF would decrease hospital length of stay (LOS). The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) was queried for BTPs ≥18 y old who underwent SSRF. Patients who received INCA ((+)INCA) were compared to patients who did not ((-)INCA). The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) LOS and in-hospital complications. A subgroup analysis of only flail chest patients was performed. From 15,784 BTPs, 750 (4.8%) received INCA. Hospital LOS was similar between groups (12 versus 12 d, P = 0.10); however, the (+)INCA patients had decreased ICU LOS (6 versus 7 d, P < 0.001). The (+)INCA cohort also had decreased hospital complications (20.4% versus 24.4%, P = 0.01), including pulmonary embolism (0.7% versus 1.8%, P = 0.02) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (2.1% versus 3.8%, P = 0.02). On subgroup analysis of flail chest patients, decreased ICU LOS in the (+)INCA patients remained a significant outcome (7 versus 8 d, P = 0.02). Nearly 5% of SSRF patients received INCA. While overall LOS was similar, the (+)INCA cohort had decreased ICU LOS and in-hospital complications. Future studies are needed to corroborate these findings and evaluate any long-term complications associated with INCA before widespread adoption.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39303646
pii: S0022-4804(24)00532-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105-110

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Negaar Aryan (N)

Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California.

Jeffry Nahmias (J)

Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California.

Areg Grigorian (A)

Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California.

Lourdes Swentek (L)

Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California.

Andrew R Doben (AR)

Division of Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut.

Zachary M Bauman (ZM)

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Ronald I Gross (RI)

Department of Surgery, St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut.

Zachary Warriner (Z)

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Albert B Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky.

Sebastian Schubl (S)

Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California. Electronic address: sschubl@hs.uci.edu.

Classifications MeSH