Site-discordant expression of myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm.

BPDCN MNDA blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm immunohistochemistry myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen

Journal

American journal of clinical pathology
ISSN: 1943-7722
Titre abrégé: Am J Clin Pathol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370470

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 30 05 2024
accepted: 24 08 2024
medline: 21 9 2024
pubmed: 21 9 2024
entrez: 20 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and aggressive hematologic neoplasm that can show clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic overlap with acute myeloid leukemia. Myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen (MNDA) is a nuclear protein expressed by myelomonocytic cells previously reported to be reliably absent in BPDCN and proposed as a useful adjunct for the distinction of BPDCN and acute myeloid leukemia. We encountered a case of BPDCN that showed strong nuclear expression of MNDA in bone marrow and breast samples and weak to absent expression in skin samples, prompting us to reevaluate the expression of MNDA in BPDCN. We collected all available BPDCN cases from the Stanford University archives collected in the past 10 years and subjected them to MNDA immunohistochemistry. In select cases, molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing was performed. We found 4 cases (of 8 total examined [50%]) with convincing site-discordant MNDA expression. This expression was seen in 3 of 6 (50%) bone marrow samples, 1 of 2 (50%) breast soft tissue samples, and 3 of 14 (up to 21%) skin samples and was not obviously predicted by age, sex, history of myeloid neoplasm, or treatment history. In 2 cases, MNDA was strongly expressed in 2 distinct sites (breast/bone marrow, skin/bone marrow) and negative in subsequent samples. Our findings suggest that MNDA expression in BPDCN is anatomic site dependent and transient, with noncutaneous infiltrates showing more frequent expression than cutaneous infiltrates. These results caution against the use of MNDA to exclude BPDCN when considering the differential diagnosis of a blastic extramedullary infiltrate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39303672
pii: 7762943
doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqae128
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Philip L Bulterys (PL)

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.

Atif Saleem (A)

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.
Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.

Ryanne A Brown (RA)

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.
Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.

Roberto A Novoa (RA)

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.
Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.

Kerri E Rieger (KE)

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.
Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.

Yasodha Natkunam (Y)

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.

Sebastian Fernandez-Pol (S)

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, US.

Classifications MeSH