Integrating surgical complexity and nutritional parameters to enhance prediction of postoperative complications in liver resection.


Journal

Surgery
ISSN: 1532-7361
Titre abrégé: Surgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 11 04 2024
revised: 17 08 2024
accepted: 20 08 2024
medline: 21 9 2024
pubmed: 21 9 2024
entrez: 20 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In patients undergoing liver resection, postoperative complications remain high. We hypothesized that the incidence of postoperative complications after liver resection would be predicted well by liver resection complexity and nutritional status. We retrospectively assessed patients undergoing liver resection at The University of Tokyo Hospital from 2011 to 2021. Liver resection procedures were categorized by surgical complexity using a 3-level complexity classification. Nutritional parameters (including cholinesterase and albumin levels) were evaluated together with well-known nutritional indexes, including the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, prognostic nutritional index, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and controlling nutritional status. Of 1,258 patients, 570 (44.5%) experienced postoperative complications, with 506 (39.9%) requiring treatment (Clavien-Dindo grade II or greater). Multivariate logistic regression model analyses showed that cholinesterase and albumin levels, complexity classification, and open approach were associated with postoperative complications. The cholinesterase-liver resection complexity/approach model (area under the curve, 0.634) performed significantly better in predicting complications than the prognostic nutritional index (area under the curve, 0.560; P < .001), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (area under the curve, 0.557; P < .001), controlling nutritional status (area under the curve, 0.502; P < .001), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (area under the curve, 0.513; P < .001), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio scores (area under the curve, 0.515; P < .001). On the basis of the cholinesterase-liver resection complexity/approach model, estimated complications ranged from 9.6% to 53.4%, and patients with well-maintained cholinesterase levels were estimated to have a 5-15% lower probability of complications than patients with impaired cholinesterase levels. This finding was validated with an external Western cohort. The cholinesterase-liver resection complexity/approach model better predicted postoperative complications than nutritional indicators alone and may be useful for selecting patients who may benefit from nutritional support.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In patients undergoing liver resection, postoperative complications remain high. We hypothesized that the incidence of postoperative complications after liver resection would be predicted well by liver resection complexity and nutritional status.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively assessed patients undergoing liver resection at The University of Tokyo Hospital from 2011 to 2021. Liver resection procedures were categorized by surgical complexity using a 3-level complexity classification. Nutritional parameters (including cholinesterase and albumin levels) were evaluated together with well-known nutritional indexes, including the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, prognostic nutritional index, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and controlling nutritional status.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 1,258 patients, 570 (44.5%) experienced postoperative complications, with 506 (39.9%) requiring treatment (Clavien-Dindo grade II or greater). Multivariate logistic regression model analyses showed that cholinesterase and albumin levels, complexity classification, and open approach were associated with postoperative complications. The cholinesterase-liver resection complexity/approach model (area under the curve, 0.634) performed significantly better in predicting complications than the prognostic nutritional index (area under the curve, 0.560; P < .001), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (area under the curve, 0.557; P < .001), controlling nutritional status (area under the curve, 0.502; P < .001), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (area under the curve, 0.513; P < .001), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio scores (area under the curve, 0.515; P < .001). On the basis of the cholinesterase-liver resection complexity/approach model, estimated complications ranged from 9.6% to 53.4%, and patients with well-maintained cholinesterase levels were estimated to have a 5-15% lower probability of complications than patients with impaired cholinesterase levels. This finding was validated with an external Western cohort.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The cholinesterase-liver resection complexity/approach model better predicted postoperative complications than nutritional indicators alone and may be useful for selecting patients who may benefit from nutritional support.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39304447
pii: S0039-6060(24)00600-7
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.021
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest/Disclosure The authors have no relevant financial disclosures.

Auteurs

Tomoaki Hayakawa (T)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Yoshikuni Kawaguchi (Y)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: yokawaguchi-tky@umin.ac.jp.

Kyoji Ito (K)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Andrea Campisi (A)

Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation and Teaching HospiSacred Hearttal IRCCS A. Gemelli, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

Francesco Ardito (F)

Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation and Teaching HospiSacred Hearttal IRCCS A. Gemelli, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

Satoru Abe (S)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Yujiro Nishisoka (Y)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Akinori Miyata (A)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Akihiko Ichida (A)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Nobuhisa Akamatsu (N)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Junichi Kaneko (J)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Felice Giuliante (F)

Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation and Teaching HospiSacred Hearttal IRCCS A. Gemelli, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

Kiyoshi Hasegawa (K)

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: hasegawa-2su@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Classifications MeSH