Mid- to long-term outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as revision procedure for failed hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture.
Arthroplasty
Grammont reverse prosthesis
Hemiarthroplasty
Infection
Long-term follow-up
Periprosthetic fracture
Prosthesis
Proximal humerus fracture
Reoperation
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Revision
Trauma
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Sep 2024
20 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
24
03
2024
accepted:
12
09
2024
medline:
21
9
2024
pubmed:
21
9
2024
entrez:
20
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Insufficient tuberosity healing is the most common reason for poor outcome after treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) using hemiarthroplasty (HA). In these cases, revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can improve function and reduce pain in the short term, however, long-term results remain scarce. Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological mid- to long-term results in patients with a revision RTSA after failed HA for PHF. In this retrospective study all patients that received a revision to RTSA after failed fracture HA between 2006 and 2018 were included. A total of 49 shoulders in 48 patients (38 female, 10 male; mean age 82 ± 9 years) were identified in our database. A total of 20 patients (17 female, 3 male; mean age was 79 ± 9 years) were available for follow-up examination after a mean time period of approximately eight years (3-14 years) after revision surgery. At final follow-up, patients were assessed using a subjective shoulder value (SSV), range of motion (ROM), visual analogue score (VAS), the Constant Score (CS) and the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12). At final follow-up, mean CS was 55 ± 19 (19-91), VAS averaged 3 ± 3 (0-8) and mean SSV was 61 ± 18% (18-90%). Mean SF-12 was 44 (28-57) with a mean physical component summary (PCS) of 38 (21-56) and a mean mental component summary (MCS) of 51 (29-67). On average active forward flexion (FF) was 104° (10-170°), active abduction (ABD) was 101° (50-170°), active external rotation (ER) was 19° (10-30°) and active internal rotation (IR) of the lumbosacral transition was reached. Three patients presented with a periprosthetic humeral fracture after RTSA implantation and underwent a reoperation (15%) during follow-up period. Revision RTSA results in promising clinical results in patients after initial failed HA after PHF. A complication and reoperation rate of 15% is tolerable in consideration of satisfactory functional and psychological outcome. Retrospectively registered.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Insufficient tuberosity healing is the most common reason for poor outcome after treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) using hemiarthroplasty (HA). In these cases, revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can improve function and reduce pain in the short term, however, long-term results remain scarce. Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological mid- to long-term results in patients with a revision RTSA after failed HA for PHF.
METHODS
METHODS
In this retrospective study all patients that received a revision to RTSA after failed fracture HA between 2006 and 2018 were included. A total of 49 shoulders in 48 patients (38 female, 10 male; mean age 82 ± 9 years) were identified in our database. A total of 20 patients (17 female, 3 male; mean age was 79 ± 9 years) were available for follow-up examination after a mean time period of approximately eight years (3-14 years) after revision surgery. At final follow-up, patients were assessed using a subjective shoulder value (SSV), range of motion (ROM), visual analogue score (VAS), the Constant Score (CS) and the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12).
RESULTS
RESULTS
At final follow-up, mean CS was 55 ± 19 (19-91), VAS averaged 3 ± 3 (0-8) and mean SSV was 61 ± 18% (18-90%). Mean SF-12 was 44 (28-57) with a mean physical component summary (PCS) of 38 (21-56) and a mean mental component summary (MCS) of 51 (29-67). On average active forward flexion (FF) was 104° (10-170°), active abduction (ABD) was 101° (50-170°), active external rotation (ER) was 19° (10-30°) and active internal rotation (IR) of the lumbosacral transition was reached. Three patients presented with a periprosthetic humeral fracture after RTSA implantation and underwent a reoperation (15%) during follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Revision RTSA results in promising clinical results in patients after initial failed HA after PHF. A complication and reoperation rate of 15% is tolerable in consideration of satisfactory functional and psychological outcome.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Retrospectively registered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39304857
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07870-8
pii: 10.1186/s12891-024-07870-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
752Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–7.
pubmed: 16814787
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130
Robinson PM, Harrison T, Cook A, Parker MJ. Orthopaedic injuries associated with hip fractures in those aged over 60 years: a study of patterns of injury and outcomes for 1971 patients. Injury. 2012;43(7):1131–4.
pubmed: 22465517
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.03.012
Lefevre-Colau MM, Babinet A, Fayad F, Fermanian J, Anract P, Roren A, et al. Immediate mobilization compared with conventional immobilization for the impacted nonoperatively treated proximal Humeral fracture: a randomized controlled trial. JBJS. 2007;89(12):2582–90.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01419
Solomon JA, Joseph SM, Shishani Y, Victoroff BN, Wilber JH, Gobezie R, et al. Cost analysis of hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fractures. Orthopedics. 2016;39(4):230–4.
pubmed: 27322171
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160610-03
van der Merwe M, Boyle MJ, Frampton CMA, Ball CM. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26(9):1539–45.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.02.005
Ferrel JR, Trinh TQ, Fischer RA. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(1):60–8.
pubmed: 25186842
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000224
Neer CS. 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1077–89.
pubmed: 5455339
doi: 10.2106/00004623-197052060-00001
Dillon MT, Prentice HA, Burfeind WE, Chan PH, Navarro RA. The increasing role of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. 2019;50(3):676–80.
pubmed: 30738568
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.034
Patel AH, Wilder JH, Ofa SA, Lee OC, Savoie FH 3, O’Brien MJ, et al. Trending a decade of proximal humerus fracture management in older adults. JSES Int. 2022;6(1):137–43.
pubmed: 35141688
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.08.006
Rosas S, Law TY, Kurowicki J, Formaini N, Kalandiak SP, Levy JC. Trends in surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in the Medicare population: a nationwide study of records from 2009 to 2012. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(4):608–13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.011
Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Molé D. Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2002;11(5):401–12.
doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.124527
Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Revision total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of glenoid arthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(6):860–7.
pubmed: 9655104
doi: 10.2106/00004623-199806000-00010
Levine WN, Connor PM, Yamaguchi K, Self EB, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, et al. Humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Orthopedics. 1998;21(1):68–73 quiz 4–5.
pubmed: 9474634
doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19980101-15
Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, Frankle MA. Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2003;12(6):569–77.
doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00213-1
Green A, Barnard WL, Limbird RS. Humeral head replacement for acute, four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1993;2(5):249–54.
doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80084-0
Baudi P, Campochiaro G, Serafini F, Gazzotti G, Matino G, Rovesta C, et al. Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparative study of functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture. Musculoskelet Surg. 2014;98(Suppl 1):19–25.
pubmed: 24659199
doi: 10.1007/s12306-014-0322-3
Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M, Farrell E, Menth-Chiari W, Lajtai G, et al. Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(2):217–9.
pubmed: 15046436
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14553
Sebastiá-Forcada E, Cebrián-Gómez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillén V. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23(10):1419–26.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.035
Holschen M, Siemes MK, Witt KA, Steinbeck J. Five-year outcome after conversion of a hemiarthroplasty when used for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018;100–b(6):761–6.
pubmed: 29855243
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B6.BJJ-2017-1280.R1
Holschen M, Franetzki B, Witt KA, Liem D, Steinbeck J. Conversions from anatomic shoulder replacements to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the indications for initial surgery influence the clinical outcome after revision surgery? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137(2):167–72.
pubmed: 27858226
doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2595-5
Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM. Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(1):32–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.006
Park YK, Kim SH, Oh JH. Intermediate-term outcome of hemiarthroplasty for comminuted proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26(1):85–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.008
Loew M, Heitkemper S, Parsch D, Schneider S, Rickert M. Influence of the design of the prosthesis on the outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in displaced fractures of the head of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(3):345–50.
pubmed: 16498009
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B3.16909
Krishnan SG, Reineck JR, Bennion PD, Feher L, Burkhead WZ. Jr. Shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: does a fracture-specific stem make a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(12):3317–23.
pubmed: 21598120
pmcid: 3210275
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1919-6
Bonnevialle N, Tournier C, Clavert P, Ohl X, Sirveaux F, Saragaglia D. Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 4-part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: Multicenter retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(5):569–73.
pubmed: 27118097
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.02.014
Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, Craig EV, Gulotta LV. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24(10):1560–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.018
Wang J, Zhu Y, Zhang F, Chen W, Tian Y, Zhang Y. Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly. Int Orthop. 2016;40(3):531–9.
pubmed: 26105763
doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2811-x
Gallinet D, Clappaz, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol. 2009;95(1):48–55.
Sirveaux F, Roche O, Molé D. Shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fracture. Orthop Traumatology: Surg Res. 2010;96(6):683–94.
Shukla DR, McAnany S, Kim J, Overley S, Parsons BO. Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(2):330–40.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.030
Imiolczyk JP, Moroder P, Scheibel M. Fracture-specific and conventional stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures—a retrospective, observational study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):175.
pubmed: 33419012
pmcid: 7825286
doi: 10.3390/jcm10020175
Walker M, Brooks J, Willis M, Frankle M. How reverse shoulder arthroplasty works. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(9):2440–51.
pubmed: 21484471
pmcid: 3148368
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1892-0
Gunst S, Louboutin L, Swan J, Lustig S, Servien E, Nove-Josserand L. Does healing of both greater and lesser tuberosities improve functional outcome after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture? A retrospective study of twenty-eight cases with a computed tomography scan at a minimum of one-year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2021;45(3):681–7.
pubmed: 33420880
doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04928-9
Levy J, Frankle M, Mighell M, Pupello D. The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(2):292–300.
pubmed: 17272443
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200702000-00010
Gohlke F, Rolf O. [Revision of failed fracture hemiarthroplasties to reverse total shoulder prosthesis through the transhumeral approach: method incorporating a pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007;19(2):185–208.
pubmed: 17530198
doi: 10.1007/s00064-007-1202-x
Patel DN, Young B, Onyekwelu I, Zuckerman JD, Kwon YW. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21(11):1478–83.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.004
Akgün D, Wiethölter M, Maziak N, Paksoy A, Karczewski D, Scheibel M, et al. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic shoulder infection is associated with high rate of failure to reimplant and mortality. J Clin Med. 2021;10(21):5186.
pubmed: 34768706
pmcid: 8584704
doi: 10.3390/jcm10215186
Izakovicova P, Borens O, Trampuz A. Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(7):482–94.
pubmed: 31423332
pmcid: 6667982
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180092
Moroder P, Gerhardt C, Renz N, Trampuz A, Scheibel M. Diagnostik und management des endoprotheseninfekts am schultergelenk. Obere Extremität. 2016;11:78–87.
doi: 10.1007/s11678-016-0361-5
Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1645–54.
pubmed: 15483283
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040181
Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Søjbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008;17(2):355–61.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022
Gilbart MK, Gerber C. Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the constant score. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16(6):717–21.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.123
Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3130–9.
pubmed: 11124729
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008
McNally M, Sousa R, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Chen AF, Soriano A, Vogely HC, et al. The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2021;103–b(1):18–25.
pubmed: 33380199
pmcid: 7954183
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1
Durchholz H, Salomonsson B, Moroder P, Lambert S, Page R, Audigé L, et al. Core set of radiographic parameters for shoulder arthroplasty monitoring: criteria defined by an International Delphi Consensus process. JB JS Open Access. 2019;4(4): e0025.
pubmed: 32043057
pmcid: 6959915
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00025
Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Molé D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(3):388–95.
pubmed: 15125127
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14024
Ware JE. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Health Inst. 1993;6(1–6):22.
Brook RH, Ware JE Jr, Rogers WH, Keeler EB, Davies AR, Donald CA, et al. Does free care improve adults’ health? Results from a randomized controlled trial. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(23):1426–34.
pubmed: 6355851
doi: 10.1056/NEJM198312083092305
Reuther F, Irlenbusch U, Kääb MJ, Kohut G. Conversion of hemiarthroplasty to reverse shoulder arthroplasty with humeral stem retention. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):834.
pubmed: 35160285
pmcid: 8837156
doi: 10.3390/jcm11030834