Exploring the contextual assumptions, interventions and outcomes of digital advance care planning systems: A theory of change approach to understand implementation and evaluation.

Palliative care advance care planning electronic health record systems end of life care mid-range programme theory technology

Journal

Palliative medicine
ISSN: 1477-030X
Titre abrégé: Palliat Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 21 9 2024
pubmed: 21 9 2024
entrez: 21 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Digital advance care planning systems are used internationally to document and share patients' wishes and preferences to inform care delivery. However, their use is impeded by a limited understanding of factors influencing implementation and evaluation. To develop mid-range programme theory to account for technological, infrastructure and human factor influences on digital advance care planning systems. Exploratory qualitative research design incorporating Theory of Change workshops that explored contextual assumptions affecting digital advance care planning in practice. A mid-range programme theory was developed through thematic framework analysis using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, generating a conceptual model depicting contextual assumptions, interventions and outcomes influencing implementation. A total of 38 participants (16 from London, 14 from West Yorkshire and 8 online) including patients, carers and health and care professionals (including those with commissioning responsibilities). A conceptual model was generated depicting five distinct components relating to digital advance care planning system use: (sociocultural, technical and structural prerequisites; recognition of the clinical need for conversation; having conversations and documenting decisions; accessing, actioning and amending; and using data to support evaluation, use and implementation). There were differences and uncertainty relating to what digital advance care planning systems are, who they are for and how they should be evaluated. Digital advance care planning lacks shared beliefs and practices, despite these being essential for complex technology implementation. Our mid-range programme theory can guide their further development and application by considering technological, infrastructure and human factor influences to optimise their implementation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Digital advance care planning systems are used internationally to document and share patients' wishes and preferences to inform care delivery. However, their use is impeded by a limited understanding of factors influencing implementation and evaluation.
AIM UNASSIGNED
To develop mid-range programme theory to account for technological, infrastructure and human factor influences on digital advance care planning systems.
DESIGN UNASSIGNED
Exploratory qualitative research design incorporating Theory of Change workshops that explored contextual assumptions affecting digital advance care planning in practice. A mid-range programme theory was developed through thematic framework analysis using the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, generating a conceptual model depicting contextual assumptions, interventions and outcomes influencing implementation.
PARTICIPANTS UNASSIGNED
A total of 38 participants (16 from London, 14 from West Yorkshire and 8 online) including patients, carers and health and care professionals (including those with commissioning responsibilities).
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
A conceptual model was generated depicting five distinct components relating to digital advance care planning system use: (sociocultural, technical and structural prerequisites; recognition of the clinical need for conversation; having conversations and documenting decisions; accessing, actioning and amending; and using data to support evaluation, use and implementation). There were differences and uncertainty relating to what digital advance care planning systems are, who they are for and how they should be evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
Digital advance care planning lacks shared beliefs and practices, despite these being essential for complex technology implementation. Our mid-range programme theory can guide their further development and application by considering technological, infrastructure and human factor influences to optimise their implementation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39305080
doi: 10.1177/02692163241280134
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2692163241280134

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Andy Bradshaw (A)

Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.

Matthew J Allsop (MJ)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Jacqueline Birtwistle (J)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Catherine J Evans (CJ)

Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.

Samuel D Relton (SD)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Suzanne H Richards (SH)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Maureen Twiddy (M)

Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

Robbie Foy (R)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Sarah Yardley (S)

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.

Katherine E Sleeman (KE)

Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH