Minimally Invasive Distal Metatarsal Diaphyseal Osteotomy (MIS-DMDO) for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Plantar Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

diabetes diabetic foot ulcer minimal invasive metatarsal osteotomies preulcerative lesions

Journal

Foot & ankle international
ISSN: 1944-7876
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9433869

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 21 9 2024
pubmed: 21 9 2024
entrez: 21 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Diabetic foot is one of the major complications of diabetes, affecting 15% of patients with diabetes. This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with diabetes affected by forefoot plantar preulcerative or ulcerative lesions who have undergone minimally invasive distal metatarsal diaphyseal osteotomy (MIS-DMDO) to assess its efficacy in the prevention and treatment of chronic plantar diabetic foot ulcers (CPDFUs). The study included 60 patients, 38 with preulcers and 22 with ulcers, with at least 2 years of clinical and radiologic follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score, the Foot Function Index (FFI), and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). The radiographic evaluation was performed according to the Maestro criteria. Both groups improved in clinical and radiologic outcomes when comparing baseline measurements to those at the final follow-up. There were no statistical differences between preulcer and ulcer groups in terms of both clinical and radiologic outcomes, with the only exception being FFI, which was lower in the preulcerative group. In multivariate analysis, gender and glycated hemoglobin (HbA Carefully performed minimally invasive distal metatarsal diaphyseal osteotomy can be an effective approach to the care of impending or chronically present plantar diabetic foot ulcers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Diabetic foot is one of the major complications of diabetes, affecting 15% of patients with diabetes. This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with diabetes affected by forefoot plantar preulcerative or ulcerative lesions who have undergone minimally invasive distal metatarsal diaphyseal osteotomy (MIS-DMDO) to assess its efficacy in the prevention and treatment of chronic plantar diabetic foot ulcers (CPDFUs).
METHODS UNASSIGNED
The study included 60 patients, 38 with preulcers and 22 with ulcers, with at least 2 years of clinical and radiologic follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score, the Foot Function Index (FFI), and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). The radiographic evaluation was performed according to the Maestro criteria.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Both groups improved in clinical and radiologic outcomes when comparing baseline measurements to those at the final follow-up. There were no statistical differences between preulcer and ulcer groups in terms of both clinical and radiologic outcomes, with the only exception being FFI, which was lower in the preulcerative group. In multivariate analysis, gender and glycated hemoglobin (HbA
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
Carefully performed minimally invasive distal metatarsal diaphyseal osteotomy can be an effective approach to the care of impending or chronically present plantar diabetic foot ulcers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39305167
doi: 10.1177/10711007241268082
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10711007241268082

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. ICMJE forms for all authors are available online.

Auteurs

Carlo Biz (C)

Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Centre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Elisa Belluzzi (E)

Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Centre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Musculoskeletal Pathology and Oncology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Alessandro Rossin (A)

Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Fabiana Mori (F)

Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Assunta Pozzuoli (A)

Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Centre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Musculoskeletal Pathology and Oncology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Nicola Luigi Bragazzi (NL)

Department of Food and Drugs, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Pietro Ruggieri (P)

Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Centre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Classifications MeSH