Quality and access outcomes in 2 Veterans Health Administration facilities with fidelity to the comprehensive medication management framework.

access comprehensive medication management delivery of health care pharmacists quality reference standards veterans health

Journal

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
ISSN: 1535-2900
Titre abrégé: Am J Health Syst Pharm
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9503023

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 17 07 2024
medline: 21 9 2024
pubmed: 21 9 2024
entrez: 21 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Utilization of clinical pharmacists providing comprehensive medication management (CMM) has been shown to improve the quadruple aim of healthcare. Lack of fidelity surrounding CMM practice standardization components has led to heterogeneity in interpretation of clinical pharmacist outcomes. We compared 2 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities with the patient-aligned care team (PACT) Platinum Practice designation in terms of clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) access and care quality relative to national CPP averages. All data was extracted from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) and reports derived from data within the CDW. Within the fiscal year 2019-2020 timeframe, the PACT Platinum Practice facilities were assessed against a national average comparator on quality and access metrics using electronic VHA databases that capture data on patient visits with a CPP. For the evaluation of care quality, an electronic composite score of diabetes and hypertension metrics was used. Third next available appointment for the primary care provider (PCP) and CPP utilization were used as measures of access. Compared to national averages, the PACT Platinum Practice facilities had a higher proportion of patients meeting the evaluated quality metric across all months of the study period. For access, the mean time to the third next available primary care appointment was lower for the PACT Platinum Practice facilities compared to the national average. PACT Platinum sites had CPP utilization rates higher than national averages across the study period, and these rates remained stable. This study demonstrated improved quality and access outcomes for 2 VA medical centers designated as PACT Platinum Practice sites relative to national averages. This is important because these practices have been evaluated and shown to have fidelity with the CMM practice management component. Evaluation of outcomes removing the element of practice heterogeneity allows for a more standardized comparison of outcome measures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39305238
pii: 7763048
doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae209
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2024. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Auteurs

Kyleigh Gould (K)

Kansas City Veterans Administration Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA.

M Shawn McFarland (MS)

Clinical Pharmacy Practice Office, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.

Ellina Seckel (E)

William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.

Michael Tran (M)

Clinical Pharmacy Practice Office, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.

Heather Ourth (H)

Clinical Pharmacy Practice Office, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.

Anthony Morreale (A)

Clinical Pharmacy Practice Office, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.

Classifications MeSH