Enhancing Biomarker Detection in Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Pre-analytical Reverse Transcription Enzymes for Liquid Biopsy Application.

Biomarker Circulating Tumour Cells Liquid biopsy Metastatic cancer Methodology Reverse Transcription Sensitivity

Journal

Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology
ISSN: 1530-0307
Titre abrégé: Lab Invest
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376617

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 15 05 2024
revised: 21 08 2024
accepted: 16 09 2024
medline: 23 9 2024
pubmed: 23 9 2024
entrez: 22 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Circulating tumour cells and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers might one day play a crucial role in the treatment decision process for patients of several cancer entities. However, clinical studies on liquid biopsy approaches revealed distinct detection rates and thus, different risk scoring for patients. This study delves into the comparison of two utilised reverse transcription (RT) enzymes, namely SuperScript™ IV VILO™ (VILO) and Sensiscript (SS), aiming to understand their impact on biomarker detection rates. Prostate cancer cell lines were used to assess detection limits, followed by an investigation of biomarker status in clinical liquid biopsy samples of distinct tumour entities. Our findings highlight the superior reverse transcription efficacy of VILO over SS, commonly used in studies employing the AdnaTest platform. The enhanced efficacy of VILO results in a significantly higher number of patients positive for biomarkers. Clinically, the use of a less sensitive enzyme system may lead to the misclassification of genuinely biomarker-positive patients, potentially altering their prognosis due to inadequate clinical monitoring or inappropriate treatment strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39307310
pii: S0023-6837(24)01820-8
doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2024.102142
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102142

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Neele Wüstmann (N)

Department of Urology, University Hospital, Muenster.

Verena Humberg (V)

Department of Urology, University Hospital, Muenster.

Julia Vieler (J)

Department of Urology, University Hospital, Muenster.

Konstantin Seitzer (K)

Department of Urology, University Hospital, Muenster.

Sabine von Rüden (S)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital, Muenster.

Mazen A Juratli (MA)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital, Muenster.

Andreas Pascher (A)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital, Muenster.

Marcel Kemper (M)

Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital, Muenster.

Annalen Bleckmann (A)

Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital, Muenster.

André Franken (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Duesseldorf), 53127 Bonn, Germany.

Hans Neubauer (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Duesseldorf), 53127 Bonn, Germany.

Tanja N Fehm (TN)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Duesseldorf), 53127 Bonn, Germany.

Martin Bögemann (M)

Department of Urology, University Hospital, Muenster.

Katrin Schlack (K)

Department of Urology, University Hospital, Muenster.

Andres Jan Schrader (AJ)

Department of Urology, University Hospital, Muenster.

Christof Bernemann (C)

Department of Urology, University Hospital, Muenster. Electronic address: christof.bernemann@ukmuenster.de.

Classifications MeSH