Effects of within-day intervals on adaptation to visually induced motion sickness in a virtual-reality motorcycling simulator.
Adaptation
Motion sickness
Multisensory learning
Simulator sickness
Virtual reality
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 09 2024
22 09 2024
Historique:
received:
11
10
2023
accepted:
28
08
2024
medline:
23
9
2024
pubmed:
23
9
2024
entrez:
22
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study investigated the effects of the time interval between virtual reality (VR) sessions on visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) reduction to better understand adaptation to and recovery from a nauseating VR experience. The participants experienced two 6-min VR sessions of a first-person motorcycle ride through a head-mounted display with (1) a 6-min interval, (2) an interval until the VIMS score reached zero, and (3) a 60-min interval. The results showed that for each condition, VIMS in the second session was aggravated, unchanged, or attenuated, respectively, indicating that additional resting time was necessary for VIMS adaptation. This study suggests that a certain type of multisensory learning attenuates VIMS symptoms within a relatively short time, requiring at least 20 min of additional resting time after subjective recovery from VIMS symptoms. This finding has important implications for reducing the time interval between repeated challenges when adapting to nauseating stimuli during VR experiences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39307847
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71526-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-71526-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21302Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 22H00502
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Oman, C. M. Motion sickness: A synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 68, 294–303 (1990).
pubmed: 2178753
doi: 10.1139/y90-044
Ebenholtz, S. M. Motion sickness and oculomotor systems in virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1, 302–305 (1992).
doi: 10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.302
Cobb, S. V. G. Measurement of postural stability before and after immersion in a virtual environment. Appl. Ergon. 30, 47–57 (1999).
pubmed: 10098816
doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00038-6
Munafo, J., Diedrick, M. & Stoffregen, T. A. The virtual reality head-mounted display oculus Rift induces motion sickness and is sexist in its effects. Exp. Brain Res. 235, 889–901 (2017).
pubmed: 27915367
doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4846-7
Milleville-Pennel, I. & Charron, C. Do mental workload and presence experienced when driving a real car predispose drivers to simulator sickness? An exploratory study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 74, 192–202 (2015).
pubmed: 25463960
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.021
Roenker, D. L., Cissell, G. M., Ball, K. K., Wadley, V. G. & Edwards, J. D. Speed-of-processing and driving simulator training result in improved driving performance. Hum. Factors 45, 218–233 (2003).
pubmed: 14529195
doi: 10.1518/hfes.45.2.218.27241
Brooks, J. O. et al. Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42, 788–796 (2010).
pubmed: 20380904
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.013
Grassini, S., Laumann, K., de Martin Topranin, V. & Thorp, S. Evaluating the effect of multi-sensory stimulations on simulator sickness and sense of presence during HMD-mediated VR experience. Ergonomics 64, 1532–1542 (2021).
pubmed: 34165389
doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1941279
Keshavarz, B., Riecke, B. E., Hettinger, L. J. & Campos, J. L. Vection and visually induced motion sickness: How are they related?. Front. Psychol. 6, 472 (2015).
pubmed: 25941509
pmcid: 4403286
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00472
Sawada, Y. et al. Effects of synchronised engine sound and vibration presentation on visually induced motion sickness. Sci. Rep. 10, 7553 (2020).
pubmed: 32398641
pmcid: 7217965
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64302-y
Caserman, P., Garcia-Agundez, A., Gámez Zerban, A. & Göbel, S. Cybersickness in current-generation virtual reality head-mounted displays: Systematic review and outlook. Virtual Real. 25, 1153–1170 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00513-6
Keshavarz, B. & Golding, J. F. Motion sickness: Current concepts and management. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 35, 107–112 (2022).
pubmed: 34839340
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001018
Reinhard, R. et al. The best way to assess visually induced motion sickness in a fixed-base driving simulator. Transp. Res. F 48, 74–88 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.05.005
Howarth, P. A. & Hodder, S. G. J. D. Characteristics of habituation to motion in a virtual environment. Displays 29, 117–123 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.009
Kennedy, R. S., Stanney, K. M. & Dunlap, W. P. Duration and exposure to virtual environments: Sickness curves during and across sessions. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 9, 463–472 (2000).
doi: 10.1162/105474600566952
Mackrous, I., Lavallière, M. & Teasdale, N. Adaptation to simulator sickness in older drivers following multiple sessions in a driving simulator. Gerontechnology 12, 101–111 (2014).
doi: 10.4017/gt.2013.12.2.004.00
Domeyer, J. E., Cassavaugh, N. D. & Backs, R. W. The use of adaptation to reduce simulator sickness in driving assessment and research. Accid. Anal. Prev. 53, 127–132 (2013).
pubmed: 23416680
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.039
Reason, J. T. Motion sickness adaptation: A neural mismatch model. J. R. Soc. Med. 71, 819–829 (1978).
pubmed: 731645
pmcid: 1436193
doi: 10.1177/014107687807101109
Zhang, L. L. et al. Motion sickness: Current knowledge and recent advance. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 22, 15–24 (2016).
pubmed: 26452639
doi: 10.1111/cns.12468
Krakauer, J. W., Ghez, C. & Ghilardi, M. F. Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: Consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J. Neurosci. 25, 473–478 (2005).
pubmed: 15647491
pmcid: 6725486
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-04.2005
Trempe, M. & Proteau, L. Distinct consolidation outcomes in a visuomotor adaptation task: Off-line leaning and persistent after-effect. Brain Cogn. 73, 135–145 (2010).
pubmed: 20488608
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.04.005
Yamada, C., Itaguchi, Y. & Fukuzawa, K. Effects of the amount of practice and time interval between practice sessions on the retention of internal models. PLOS One 14, e0215331 (2019).
pubmed: 30990823
pmcid: 6467396
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215331
Criscimagna-Hemminger, S. E. & Shadmehr, R. Consolidation patterns of human motor memory. J. Neurosci. 28, 9610–9618 (2008).
pubmed: 18815247
pmcid: 2665258
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3071-08.2008
Doyon, J. et al. Contribution of night and day sleep versus simple passage of time to the consolidation of motor sequence and visuomotor adaptation learning. Exp. Brain Res. 195, 15–26 (2009).
pubmed: 19277618
pmcid: 2752878
doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1748-y
Morita, Y., Ogawa, K. & Uchida, S. The effect of a daytime 2-h nap on complex motor skill learning. Sleep Biol. Rhythms 10, 302–309 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8425.2012.00576.x
Pekny, S. E. & Shadmehr, R. Optimizing effort: Increased efficiency of motor memory with time away from practice. J. Neurophysiol. 113, 445–454 (2015).
pubmed: 25355964
doi: 10.1152/jn.00638.2014
Shadmehr, R. & Brashers-Krug, T. Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J. Neurosci. 17, 409–419 (1997).
pubmed: 8987766
pmcid: 6793707
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-01-00409.1997
Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Morgan, A., Hobson, J. A. & Stickgold, R. Practice with sleep makes perfect: Sleep-dependent motor skill learning. Neuron 35, 205–211 (2002).
pubmed: 12123620
doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00746-8
Golding, J. F. & Stott, J. R. Objective and subjective time courses of recovery from motion sickness assessed by repeated motion challenges. J. Vestib. Res. 7, 421–428 (1997).
pubmed: 9397392
doi: 10.3233/VES-1997-7601
Golding, J. F. Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness. Brain Res. Bull. 47, 507–516 (1998).
pubmed: 10052582
doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00091-4
Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S. & Lilienthal, M. G. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3, 203–220 (1993).
doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
Keshavarz, B. & Hecht, H. Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness. Hum. Factors 53, 415–426 (2011).
pubmed: 21901938
doi: 10.1177/0018720811403736
Stoffregen, T. A., Chen, Y.-C. & Koslucher, F. C. Motion control, motion sickness, and the postural dynamics of mobile devices. Exp. Brain Res. 232, 1389–1397 (2014).
pubmed: 24504199
doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3859-3
Brashers-Krug, T., Shadmehr, R. & Bizzi, E. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382, 252–255 (1996).
pubmed: 8717039
doi: 10.1038/382252a0
Krakauer, J. W. Motor learning and consolidation: The case of visuomotor rotation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 629, 405–421 (2009).
pubmed: 19227512
pmcid: 2672910
doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_21
Itaguchi, Y. & Fukuzawa, K. Influence of speed and accuracy constraints on motor learning for a trajectory-based movement. J. Mot. Behav. 50, 653–663 (2018).
pubmed: 29190186
doi: 10.1080/00222895.2017.1400946
Albouy, G. et al. Daytime sleep enhances consolidation of the spatial but not motoric representation of motor sequence memory. PLOS One 8, e52805 (2013).
pubmed: 23300993
pmcid: 3534707
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052805
Miall, R. C. & Wolpert, D. M. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 9, 1265–1279 (1996).
pubmed: 12662535
doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z. & Jordan, M. I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269, 1880–1882 (1995).
pubmed: 7569931
doi: 10.1126/science.7569931
Itaguchi, Y., Sugimori, E. & Fukuzawa, K. Schizotypal traits and forearm motor control against self-other produced action in a bimanual unloading task. Neuropsychologia 113, 43–51 (2018).
pubmed: 29601887
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.034
Carriot, J., Brooks, J. X. & Cullen, K. E. Multimodal integration of self-motion cues in the vestibular system: Active versus passive translations. J. Neurosci. 33, 19555–19566 (2013).
pubmed: 24336720
pmcid: 3858625
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3051-13.2013
Cullen, K. E. Internal models of self-motion: Neural computations by the vestibular cerebellum. Trends Neurosci. 46, 986–1002 (2023).
pubmed: 37739815
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.08.009
Dudai, Y. The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram?. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 51–86 (2004).
pubmed: 14744210
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142050
Gais, S. et al. Sleep transforms the cerebral trace of declarative memories. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18778–18783 (2007).
pubmed: 18000060
pmcid: 2141853
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705454104
Tetzlaff, C., Kolodziejski, C., Timme, M., Tsodyks, M. & Wörgötter, F. Synaptic scaling enables dynamically distinct short- and long-term memory formation. PLOS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003307 (2013).
pubmed: 24204240
pmcid: 3814677
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003307
Rosenberg, T. et al. The roles of protein expression in synaptic plasticity and memory consolidation. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 7, 86 (2014).
pubmed: 25429258
pmcid: 4228929
doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00086
Hu, S. & Stern, R. M. The retention of adaptation to motion sickness eliciting stimulation. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 70, 766–768 (1999).
pubmed: 10447049
Paillard, A. C. et al. Motion sickness susceptibility in healthy subjects and vestibular patients: Effects of gender, age and trait-anxiety. J. Vestib. Res. 23, 203–209 (2013).
pubmed: 24284600
doi: 10.3233/VES-130501
Ugur, E., Konukseven, B. O., Topdag, M., Cakmakci, M. E. & Topdag, D. O. Expansion to the motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire-short form: A cross-sectional study. J. Audiol. Otol. 26, 76–82 (2022).
pubmed: 35196446
pmcid: 8996090
doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00577
Keshavarz, B., Ramkhalawansingh, R., Haycock, B., Shahab, S. & Campos, J. L. Comparing simulator sickness in younger and older adults during simulated driving under different multisensory conditions. Transp. Res. F 54, 47–62 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.007
Lo, H. S. & Xie, S. Q. Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: State of the art and future prospects. Med. Eng. Phys. 34, 261–268 (2012).
pubmed: 22051085
doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.10.004
Lotze, M., Braun, C., Birbaumer, N., Anders, S. & Cohen, L. G. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain 126, 866–872 (2003).
pubmed: 12615644
doi: 10.1093/brain/awg079
Péruch, P. & Wilson, P. N. Active versus passive learning and testing in a complex outside built environment. Cogn. Process. 5, 218–227 (2004).
doi: 10.1007/s10339-004-0027-x
Dennison, M. S., Wisti, A. Z. & D’Zmura, M. Use of physiological signals to predict cybersickness. Displays 44, 42–52 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2016.07.002
Naqvi, S. A. A. et al. EEG based time and frequency dynamics analysis of visually induced motion sickness (VIMS). Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 38, 721–729 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s13246-015-0379-9
Sugita, N. et al. Evaluation of adaptation to visually induced motion sickness based on the maximum cross-correlation between pulse transmission time and heart rate. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 4, 35 (2007).
pubmed: 17903249
pmcid: 2048507
doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-4-35
Krokos, E. & Varshney, A. Quantifying VR cybersickness using EEG. Virtual Real. 26, 77–89 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00517-2
Venkatakrishnan, R. et al. Comparative evaluation of the effects of motion control on cybersickness in immersive virtual environments. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces. (VR). 672–681 (2020).