Prostate cancer temporal and regional trends in Brazil.
COVID-19 pandemic
Prostate cancer (PCa) epidemiology
Regional disparities
Screening
Temporal trends
Journal
Oncology research
ISSN: 1555-3906
Titre abrégé: Oncol Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9208097
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
25
03
2024
accepted:
27
05
2024
medline:
23
9
2024
pubmed:
23
9
2024
entrez:
23
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Brazilian Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde-SUS) is the universal public healthcare system of Brazil that maintains a nationwide database of its patients. Our primary objective was to analyze regional and temporal trends, while our secondary goal was to establish correlations between states' health economy status and their prostate cancer (PCa) epidemiology. We analyzed Brazil's nationwide data on prostate cancer (PCa) incidence, mortality, and care gathered between 2013 and 2021 by the Information Technology Department of SUS (DATA-SUS), updated monthly using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) code. In the period, 273,933 new cases of PCa and 135,336 PCa deaths were reported in men aged 50 years or over in Brazil. The median annual PCa-specific incidence rate (PCSIR) ranged from 14.7 in the Southeast to 6.9 in the North region and the median annual PCa-specific mortality rate (PCSMR) ranged from 7.7 in the Northeast to 6.0 in the South region (per 10,000 men >50). The median annual mortality to incidence ratio (MIR) was highest in the North (0.88) and lowest in the Southeast region (0.44). There were significant regional differences in PCa treatment rates (per new cases); the Midwest region had the highest median annual surgery rate (0.63) while the North region had the highest median annual systemic therapy rate (0.75) and the lowest radiation therapy rate (0.06). Temporal analysis of the data showed significant change in annual rate trends after the year 2018 for PCSIR (coefficient [ Our data shows that PCa care is dependent on the region and is likely influenced by access to treatment options. Furthermore, changes after the year 2018 underscore the influence of international guidelines on Brazilian clinicians' decision-making especially concerning population screening which in turn affected incidence and treatment rates. Limitation of our study includes limited patient-related information and data on private practices as well as an unknown impact of traveling patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39308515
doi: 10.32604/or.2024.052179
pii: 52179
pmc: PMC11413836
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1565-1573Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.