Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an index of treatment response to trans-arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma Liver transplantation Therapeutic chemoembolization

Journal

Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench
ISSN: 2008-2258
Titre abrégé: Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101525875

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 18 02 2024
accepted: 15 05 2024
medline: 23 9 2024
pubmed: 23 9 2024
entrez: 23 9 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We evaluated the response to Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. We determined the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). TACE is the most commonly used method to treat patients with large, unresectable tumors or as bridge therapy in patients with HCC before liver transplantation. In this cross-sectional study, patients with a diagnosis of HCC who were referred for TACE were studied. The response rate to TACE treatment was assessed based on dynamic MRI 28 days after treatment according to mRECIST criteria. The NLR value was calculated, and its prognostic value was evaluated to predict the response to treatment. Forty patients with HCC who underwent TACE were included. The response to TACE treatment included a complete response (CR) in 6 patients (15%), partial response (PR) in 16 patients (40%), and stable disease (SD) in 18 patients (45%). No progressive disease (PD) was found. Responders (CR and PR) were 22 patients (55%). The mean NLR after treatment in the non-responders was significantly higher than in the responders (4.2 vs. 2.4, P-value = 0.026). NLR values greater than 2.6 after treatment had a sensitivity of 70.6% and a specificity of 77.3% in diagnosing non-responders, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.73 [95% confidence interval 0.58-0.89], P-value = 0.011. Non-responders observed higher levels of NLR after treatment than responders. As a moderate prognostic factor, an NLR level of more than 2.6 after treatment could discriminate against non-responders.

Sections du résumé

Aim UNASSIGNED
We evaluated the response to Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. We determined the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
Background UNASSIGNED
TACE is the most commonly used method to treat patients with large, unresectable tumors or as bridge therapy in patients with HCC before liver transplantation.
Methods UNASSIGNED
In this cross-sectional study, patients with a diagnosis of HCC who were referred for TACE were studied. The response rate to TACE treatment was assessed based on dynamic MRI 28 days after treatment according to mRECIST criteria. The NLR value was calculated, and its prognostic value was evaluated to predict the response to treatment.
Results UNASSIGNED
Forty patients with HCC who underwent TACE were included. The response to TACE treatment included a complete response (CR) in 6 patients (15%), partial response (PR) in 16 patients (40%), and stable disease (SD) in 18 patients (45%). No progressive disease (PD) was found. Responders (CR and PR) were 22 patients (55%). The mean NLR after treatment in the non-responders was significantly higher than in the responders (4.2 vs. 2.4, P-value = 0.026). NLR values greater than 2.6 after treatment had a sensitivity of 70.6% and a specificity of 77.3% in diagnosing non-responders, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.73 [95% confidence interval 0.58-0.89], P-value = 0.011.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Non-responders observed higher levels of NLR after treatment than responders. As a moderate prognostic factor, an NLR level of more than 2.6 after treatment could discriminate against non-responders.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39308535
doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v17i3.2925
pmc: PMC11413382
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

253-259

Informations de copyright

© 2024, Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench (GHFBB).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Auteurs

Neda Shayegan (N)

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Niloofar Ayoobi (N)

Department of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Esmaeil Mohammadi (E)

Department of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Hajir Saberi (H)

Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Faeze Salahshour (F)

Department of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Liver Transplantation Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Forough Alborzi (F)

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Fateme Ziamanesh (F)

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Nahid Sadighi (N)

Department of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Mohammad Taher (M)

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Liver Transplantation Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Classifications MeSH