Upfront or delayed surgery in resectable hepatoblastoma: analysis from the children's hepatic tumors international collaboration database.
Age at diagnosis
Alpha-fetoprotein
Hepatoblastoma
Outcome
Resectable
Up-front surgery
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
29
05
2024
revised:
14
08
2024
accepted:
19
08
2024
medline:
23
9
2024
pubmed:
23
9
2024
entrez:
23
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the treatment of resectable hepatoblastoma (HB), it has not been established whether upfront surgery (UF) at diagnosis or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delayed surgery (DL) is preferred. We compared patients with localized HB who underwent either UF, or DL after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Children's Hepatic tumors International Collaboration (CHIC) database of 1605 cases enrolled in eight multicenter hepatoblastoma trials between 1988 and 2010. Among the 512 resectable HB patients who had PRETEXT (PRETreament EXTent of disease) I or II unruptured tumors at diagnosis without extrahepatic invasion, distant metastases, or massive vascular invasion, 172 underwent UF and 340 underwent DL. The primary outcomes were event-free and overall survivals after start of treatment in these two groups. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Maier analysis with long-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression models. Complete resection rates were comparable (93.6% in UF and 89.7% in DL). The total cycles of chemotherapy of DL (median:6) were significantly more than those of UF (median:4) ( The outcomes, surgical resectability, and complications were not significantly different between the UF and DL groups. Eligible patients with a low AFP level (<1000 ng/mL) or older age (≥3 years old) showed better outcomes in the UF group and might be considered for initial resection. European Network for Cancer Research in Children and Adolescents, funded through the Framework Program 7 of the European Commission; Children's Oncology Group Cure Search grant contributed by the Hepatoblastoma Foundation; Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control and Project Promoting Clinical Trials for Development of New Drugs and Medical Devices, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; and Swiss Cancer Research grant.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
In the treatment of resectable hepatoblastoma (HB), it has not been established whether upfront surgery (UF) at diagnosis or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delayed surgery (DL) is preferred. We compared patients with localized HB who underwent either UF, or DL after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Children's Hepatic tumors International Collaboration (CHIC) database of 1605 cases enrolled in eight multicenter hepatoblastoma trials between 1988 and 2010.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Among the 512 resectable HB patients who had PRETEXT (PRETreament EXTent of disease) I or II unruptured tumors at diagnosis without extrahepatic invasion, distant metastases, or massive vascular invasion, 172 underwent UF and 340 underwent DL. The primary outcomes were event-free and overall survivals after start of treatment in these two groups. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Maier analysis with long-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression models.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Complete resection rates were comparable (93.6% in UF and 89.7% in DL). The total cycles of chemotherapy of DL (median:6) were significantly more than those of UF (median:4) (
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
The outcomes, surgical resectability, and complications were not significantly different between the UF and DL groups. Eligible patients with a low AFP level (<1000 ng/mL) or older age (≥3 years old) showed better outcomes in the UF group and might be considered for initial resection.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
European Network for Cancer Research in Children and Adolescents, funded through the Framework Program 7 of the European Commission; Children's Oncology Group Cure Search grant contributed by the Hepatoblastoma Foundation; Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control and Project Promoting Clinical Trials for Development of New Drugs and Medical Devices, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; and Swiss Cancer Research grant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39309724
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102811
pii: S2589-5370(24)00390-0
pmc: PMC11414700
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
102811Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
We declare no competing interests.