An observational study of the impact of professional walking aid prescription on gait parameters for individuals with suspected balance impairments.

Accidental falls Assistive device Gait analysis Mobility limitation Postural balance

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 07 05 2024
revised: 05 09 2024
accepted: 06 09 2024
medline: 23 9 2024
pubmed: 23 9 2024
entrez: 23 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The primary management strategy for gait impairment is the adoption of a walking aid. However, there are no established criteria upon which to base a decision regarding the need for a walking aid. It appears clinicians prescribe aids based on preference, clinical experience and intuition rather than standardised objective rationale. This may contribute to the inconsistent gait response to walking aids reported in the published literature. Understanding gait changes resulting from gait aid usage may have significant impact on clinical practice by improving confidence of prescribing clinicians and compliance of walking aid usage by patients, maximising the benefits of use, and reducing any risks associated with non-use or inappropriate use, of the walking aid. Do professionally prescribed walking aids improve gait parameters? This is a secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study where participants, identified by healthcare staff requiring a mobility assessment due to potential balance impairment of any cause, walked a 20-m straight walking course under three different walking conditions (no aid, walking stick and 4-wheeled walker). Fifty-eight participants were recruited. Commonly reported spatial and temporal gait parameters were assessed using a validated gait analysis device. Changes in gait parameters across the three conditions were compared, noting the individual's professionally prescribed aid and interpreting changes in parameters towards outcomes of the 'no aid required group'. Gait cycle, cadence, stance, swing and stride length during unaided walking were significantly changed when a walking stick was prescribed (p < 0.05). Stance, swing, double support, stride length, speed, max toe clearance and minimum toe clearance were significantly changed when a 4-wheel walker was prescribed (p < 0.05). Professional walking aid prescription improves some gait parameters. A greater number and magnitude of gait parameter improvements were seen in people requiring a 4-wheel walker than people requiring a walking stick.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The primary management strategy for gait impairment is the adoption of a walking aid. However, there are no established criteria upon which to base a decision regarding the need for a walking aid. It appears clinicians prescribe aids based on preference, clinical experience and intuition rather than standardised objective rationale. This may contribute to the inconsistent gait response to walking aids reported in the published literature. Understanding gait changes resulting from gait aid usage may have significant impact on clinical practice by improving confidence of prescribing clinicians and compliance of walking aid usage by patients, maximising the benefits of use, and reducing any risks associated with non-use or inappropriate use, of the walking aid.
Research question UNASSIGNED
Do professionally prescribed walking aids improve gait parameters?
Methods UNASSIGNED
This is a secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study where participants, identified by healthcare staff requiring a mobility assessment due to potential balance impairment of any cause, walked a 20-m straight walking course under three different walking conditions (no aid, walking stick and 4-wheeled walker). Fifty-eight participants were recruited. Commonly reported spatial and temporal gait parameters were assessed using a validated gait analysis device. Changes in gait parameters across the three conditions were compared, noting the individual's professionally prescribed aid and interpreting changes in parameters towards outcomes of the 'no aid required group'.
Results and significance UNASSIGNED
Gait cycle, cadence, stance, swing and stride length during unaided walking were significantly changed when a walking stick was prescribed (p < 0.05). Stance, swing, double support, stride length, speed, max toe clearance and minimum toe clearance were significantly changed when a 4-wheel walker was prescribed (p < 0.05). Professional walking aid prescription improves some gait parameters. A greater number and magnitude of gait parameter improvements were seen in people requiring a 4-wheel walker than people requiring a walking stick.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39309875
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37649
pii: S2405-8440(24)13680-8
pmc: PMC11416526
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e37649

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Baeho Joo reports financial support was provided by the 10.13039/501100024972Health Education and Training Institute of 10.13039/100010635Hunter New England Local Health District, Australia. All authors, Baeho Joo, Jodie Marquez and Peter Osmotherly, declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Baeho Joo (B)

School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Jodie L Marquez (J)

School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Peter G Osmotherly (PG)

School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Classifications MeSH