Patient Perspectives on Evolving Diverticulitis Treatment: An Assessment of Patient Willingness to Enroll in a Randomized Controlled Trial.


Journal

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches
ISSN: 2691-3593
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101769928

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 11 01 2024
accepted: 27 06 2024
medline: 23 9 2024
pubmed: 23 9 2024
entrez: 23 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The objective of the study was to assess patients' attitudes regarding participation in a randomized trial of antibiotics Despite evidence that antibiotics may not be necessary to treat acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, they remain the mainstay of treatment in the United States. A randomized trial in the United States evaluating antibiotic effectiveness could accelerate the implementation of antibiotic-free treatment, but providers maintain concerns that patients may be unwilling to participate. This mixed-methods study conducted semi-structured interviews of patients presenting to a quaternary care emergency department with acute diverticulitis and a web-based survey of a larger cohort. The interviews assessed patients' experiences with diverticulitis and perceptions of participation in a trial comparing antibiotics versus placebo. The survey quantified patients' willingness to participate in such a study and the relative importance of factors influencing the process. Thirteen patients completed an interview. Reasons to participate included a desire to help others or contribute to scientific knowledge. Doubts about the efficacy of observation as a treatment method were the main barrier to participation. In a survey of 218 subjects, 62% of respondents reported willingness to participate in a randomized clinical trial. "What my doctor thinks," followed by "What I have experienced in the past" were the most important decision-making factors. Patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis maintain complex and varying perceptions of antibiotic use. Most surveyed patients would be willing to participate in a trial of antibiotics

Sections du résumé

Objective UNASSIGNED
The objective of the study was to assess patients' attitudes regarding participation in a randomized trial of antibiotics
Background UNASSIGNED
Despite evidence that antibiotics may not be necessary to treat acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, they remain the mainstay of treatment in the United States. A randomized trial in the United States evaluating antibiotic effectiveness could accelerate the implementation of antibiotic-free treatment, but providers maintain concerns that patients may be unwilling to participate.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This mixed-methods study conducted semi-structured interviews of patients presenting to a quaternary care emergency department with acute diverticulitis and a web-based survey of a larger cohort. The interviews assessed patients' experiences with diverticulitis and perceptions of participation in a trial comparing antibiotics versus placebo. The survey quantified patients' willingness to participate in such a study and the relative importance of factors influencing the process.
Results UNASSIGNED
Thirteen patients completed an interview. Reasons to participate included a desire to help others or contribute to scientific knowledge. Doubts about the efficacy of observation as a treatment method were the main barrier to participation. In a survey of 218 subjects, 62% of respondents reported willingness to participate in a randomized clinical trial. "What my doctor thinks," followed by "What I have experienced in the past" were the most important decision-making factors.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis maintain complex and varying perceptions of antibiotic use. Most surveyed patients would be willing to participate in a trial of antibiotics

Identifiants

pubmed: 39310344
doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000476
pii: AOSO-D-24-00017
pmc: PMC11415118
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e476

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Auteurs

Annie Altman-Merino (A)

From the Department of School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Kemberlee Bonnet (K)

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

David Schlundt (D)

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Jesse Wrenn (J)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Wesley H Self (WH)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN.

Elisa J Gordon (EJ)

Department of Surgery, and Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Alexander T Hawkins (AT)

Department of Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Classifications MeSH