Measurement of food literacy among the adult population in urban Uganda and Kenya: development and validation of an East African food literacy scale.
Humans
Uganda
Kenya
Female
Male
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Health Literacy
/ statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
Reproducibility of Results
Urban Population
/ statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ standards
Middle Aged
Adolescent
Diet, Healthy
/ statistics & numerical data
Self Efficacy
East African People
Adult population
Development
Food literacy scale
Kenya
Uganda
Validation
Journal
Public health nutrition
ISSN: 1475-2727
Titre abrégé: Public Health Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9808463
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Sep 2024
23 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline:
23
9
2024
pubmed:
23
9
2024
entrez:
23
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Food literacy (FL) is a potential approach to address the nutrition transition in Africa, but a validated tool is lacking. We developed and validated a scale to assess FL among Ugandan and Kenyan adult populations. A mixed-method approach was applied: (1) item development using literature, expert and target group insights, (2) independent country-specific validation (content, construct, criterion and concurrent) and (3) synchronisation of the two country-specific FL-scales. Construct validity was evaluated against the prime dietary quality score (PDQS) and healthy eating self-efficacy scale (HEWSE). Urban Uganda and Kenya. Two cross-sectional cross-country surveys, adults >18 years ( The initial development yielded a forty-eight-item FL-scale draft. In total, twenty-six items were reframed to fit the country contexts. Six items differed content-wise across the two FL-scales and were dropped for a synchronised East African FL-scale. Weighted kappa tests revealed no deviations in individuals' FL when either the East African FL-scale or the country-specific FL-scales are used; 0·86 (95 % CI: 0·83, 0·89), Uganda and 0·86 (95 % CI: 0·84, 0·88), Kenya. The FL-scale showed good reliability (0·71 (95 % CI: 0·60, 0·79), Uganda; 0·78 (95 % CI: 0·69, 0·84), Kenya) and positively correlated with PDQS ( Provided culture-sensitive translation and adaptation are done, the scale may be used as a basis across East Africa.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39310997
pii: S136898002400168X
doi: 10.1017/S136898002400168X
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM