Characterizing the dynamics, reactivity and controllability of moods in depression with a Kalman filter.


Journal

PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 27 03 2024
accepted: 04 09 2024
medline: 23 9 2024
pubmed: 23 9 2024
entrez: 23 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Mood disorders involve a complex interplay between multifaceted internal emotional states, and complex external inputs. Dynamical systems theory suggests that this interplay between aspects of moods and environmental stimuli may hence determine key psychopathological features of mood disorders, including the stability of mood states, the response to external inputs, how controllable mood states are, and what interventions are most likely to be effective. However, a comprehensive computational approach to all these aspects has not yet been undertaken. Here, we argue that the combination of ecological momentary assessments (EMA) with a well-established dynamical systems framework-the humble Kalman filter-enables a comprehensive account of all these aspects. We first introduce the key features of the Kalman filter and optimal control theory and their relationship to aspects of psychopathology. We then examine the psychometric and inferential properties of combining EMA data with Kalman filtering across realistic scenarios. Finally, we apply the Kalman filter to a series of EMA datasets comprising over 700 participants with and without symptoms of depression. The results show a naive Kalman filter approach performs favourably compared to the standard vector autoregressive approach frequently employed, capturing key aspects of the data better. Furthermore, it suggests that the depressed state involves alterations to interactions between moods; alterations to how moods responds to external inputs; and as a result an alteration in how controllable mood states are. We replicate these findings qualitatively across datasets and explore an extension to optimal control theory to guide therapeutic interventions. Mood dynamics are richly and profoundly altered in depressed states. The humble Kalman filter is a well-established, rich framework to characterise mood dynamics. Its application to EMA data is valid; straightforward; and likely to result in substantial novel insights both into mechanisms and treatments.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Mood disorders involve a complex interplay between multifaceted internal emotional states, and complex external inputs. Dynamical systems theory suggests that this interplay between aspects of moods and environmental stimuli may hence determine key psychopathological features of mood disorders, including the stability of mood states, the response to external inputs, how controllable mood states are, and what interventions are most likely to be effective. However, a comprehensive computational approach to all these aspects has not yet been undertaken.
METHODS METHODS
Here, we argue that the combination of ecological momentary assessments (EMA) with a well-established dynamical systems framework-the humble Kalman filter-enables a comprehensive account of all these aspects. We first introduce the key features of the Kalman filter and optimal control theory and their relationship to aspects of psychopathology. We then examine the psychometric and inferential properties of combining EMA data with Kalman filtering across realistic scenarios. Finally, we apply the Kalman filter to a series of EMA datasets comprising over 700 participants with and without symptoms of depression.
RESULTS RESULTS
The results show a naive Kalman filter approach performs favourably compared to the standard vector autoregressive approach frequently employed, capturing key aspects of the data better. Furthermore, it suggests that the depressed state involves alterations to interactions between moods; alterations to how moods responds to external inputs; and as a result an alteration in how controllable mood states are. We replicate these findings qualitatively across datasets and explore an extension to optimal control theory to guide therapeutic interventions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Mood dynamics are richly and profoundly altered in depressed states. The humble Kalman filter is a well-established, rich framework to characterise mood dynamics. Its application to EMA data is valid; straightforward; and likely to result in substantial novel insights both into mechanisms and treatments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39312537
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012457
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-24-00523
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1012457

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Malamud et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: QJMH has obtained a research grant from Koa Health, and obtained fees and options for consultancies for Aya Technologies and Alto Neuroscience. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Jolanda Malamud (J)

Applied Computational Psychiatry Lab, Mental Health Neuroscience Department, Division of Psychiatry and Max Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Sinan Guloksuz (S)

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Ruud van Winkel (R)

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Neurosciences, Centre for Clinical Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Philippe Delespaul (P)

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Marc A F De Hert (MAF)

Department of Neurosciences, Centre for Clinical Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Psychotic Disorders, University Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium.
Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Antwerp Health Law and Ethics Chair, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Catherine Derom (C)

Centre of Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospitals, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Evert Thiery (E)

Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Nele Jacobs (N)

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Psychology, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

Bart P F Rutten (BPF)

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Quentin J M Huys (QJM)

Applied Computational Psychiatry Lab, Mental Health Neuroscience Department, Division of Psychiatry and Max Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH