Male contraceptive acceptability versus male acceptance of contraceptive responsibility.

contraception male contraception men's reproductive health reproductive responsibility

Journal

Andrology
ISSN: 2047-2927
Titre abrégé: Andrology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585129

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Historique:
revised: 12 07 2024
received: 15 02 2024
accepted: 19 07 2024
medline: 23 9 2024
pubmed: 23 9 2024
entrez: 23 9 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite the projected impact of new male contraceptives, resources and investments directed at their development remain limited in part due to concerns that men would not actually use them. Now, more than 30 studies have been conducted over the last 30 years-regionally and internationally, within clinical trials, and across populations-examining men and women's attitudes towards new male contraceptive methods, all consistently demonstrating interest in and willingness to use new methods. Yet even these studies, inclusive of competitive contraceptive market projections, seem not to be convincing enough. Rather than study whether men would be willing to use male contraceptives, more resources should be devoted to developing the infrastructure and supporting the cultural changes needed to ensure that when new male contraceptives inevitably emerge, that they will be disseminated quickly and made readily accessible. Men's views on what their roles are in society, families, relationships, and pregnancy prevention are changing in ways that may impact what they consider to be acceptable contraceptive risks. As society moves toward more gender equitable beliefs, men's positive involvement in contraception might organically develop into an expected behavior. Interventions aimed at sensitizing men toward gender equitable beliefs may pay dividends in improving male contraceptive acceptability. The current lack of a reversible male contraceptive method prevents us from collecting data that might disprove presumptions that men would be unwilling to take on responsibility for pregnancy prevention. However, studies of men's involvement in (1) over-the-counter emergency contraception, (2) vasectomy, and (3) abortion offer case studies for men's increasing consciousness of opportunities for shared contraceptive responsibility, the structural and sociopolitical barriers that men face when trying to participate in family planning, and how these might translate into new male contraceptive interest and development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39312713
doi: 10.1111/andr.13719
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1585-1589

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Andrology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Références

Heinemann K, Saad F, Wiesemes M, Heinemann LAJ. Expectations toward a novel male fertility control method and potential user types: results of a multinational survey‡. J Androl. 2005;26(2):155‐162. doi:10.1002/j.1939‐4640.2005.tb01077.x
Reynolds‐Wright JJ, Cameron NJ, Anderson RA. Will men use novel male contraceptive methods and will women trust them? A systematic review. J Sex Res. 2021;58(7):838‐849. doi:10.1080/00224499.2021.1905764
A global study of men and women's male contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors using mixed methods. Accessed February 13, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/global‐study‐men‐and‐women‐male‐contraceptive‐knowledge‐using‐mixed‐methods
Nguyen BT. The demand for male contraception: estimating the potential market for users of novel male contraceptive methods using United States National Survey of Family Growth data. Contraception. 2024;135. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2024.110438
Nguyen BT, Jacobsohn TL. Men's willingness to use novel male contraception is linked to gender‐equitable attitudes: results from an exploratory online survey. Contraception. 2023;123:110001. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2023.110001
Nguyen BT, Zaller N, Alpert W. Male access to over‐the‐counter emergency contraception. A survey of acceptability and barriers in Providence, Rhode Island. Women Health Issues. 2009;19(6):365‐372. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2009.07.003
Nguyen BT, Zaller N. Pharmacy provision of emergency contraception to men: a survey of pharmacist attitudes in Rhode Island. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2010;50(1):17‐23. doi:10.1331/JAPHA.2010.08183
Korn EA, Nguyen BT, Heyrana KJ, Cleland K. Surveying the persistence of age‐ and gender‐based restrictions on over‐the‐counter emergency contraception across pharmacies in Los Angeles County, CA. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2022;62(5):1654‐1658. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2022.04.006
Jacobsohn T, Nguyen BT, Brown JE, et al. Male contraception is coming: who do men want to prescribe their birth control. Contraception. 2022;115:44‐48. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2022.04.014
Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. Vital Health Stat. 2010;23(29):1‐44. internal‐pdf://181.88.223.34/2010‐Mosher‐Use of contraception in the United.pdf.
Nguyen BT, Long M, Petrosyan N, Grundy D, Mahoney B, Heyrana KJ. Access to male sexual and reproductive health services in publicly funded California clinics in 2018. Contraception. 2021;104(2):165‐169. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2021.04.004
Patel J, Nguyen BT. Vasectomy: an opportunity for obstetricians and gynecologists. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;63(2):289‐294. doi:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000520
Nguyen BT, Jochim AL, Shih GH. Offering the full range of contraceptive options: a survey of interest in vasectomy training in the US family planning community. Contraception. 2017;95(5):500‐504. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.01.002
Xepoleas MD, Nguyen BT, Vasectomy PatelJ. A survey of urologist's opinions on training family planning providers. Obs Gynecol. 2020;135(1):101S‐102S. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000664236.57487.68
Patel J, Nguyen BT, Shih G, Or M, Harper DM. Vasectomy training in family medicine residency programs: a national survey of residency program directors. Fam Med. 2022;54(6):438‐443. doi:10.22454/FAMMED.2022.649054
Sellke N, Tay K, Sun HH, Tatem A, Loeb A, Thirumavalavan N. The unprecedented increase in Google searches for “vasectomy” after the reversal of Roe vs Wade. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(6):1186‐1188. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.859
Zhang TR, Able C, Ramasamy R, Kohn TP. United States vasectomy incidence rises after the reversal of Roe vs. Wade in a national clinical and claims database. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(1):196‐197. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.03.025
Nguyen BT, Shih G, Turok DK. Putting the man in contraceptive mandate. Contraception. 2014;89(1):3‐5. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.001
Zhang X, Eisenberg ML. Vasectomy utilization in men aged 18–45 declined between 2002 and 2017: results from the United States National Survey for Family Growth data. Andrology. 2022;10(1):137‐142. doi:10.1111/ANDR.13093
Li VM, Heyrana KJ, Nguyen BT. Discrepant abortion reporting by interview methodology among men from the United States National Survey of Family Growth (2015‐2017). Contraception. 2022;112:111‐115. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2022.01.012. Published online.
Sweeney H, Nguyen K, Nguyen B. Men's abortion attitudes: results from an online survey of men in the US and Canada. Contraception. 2023;127:110181. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2023.110181
Heath J, Nguyen B. WHY US men have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives from urban family planning clinics. Contraception. 2023;127:110173. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2023.110173
Nguyen BT, Hebert LE, Newton SL, Gilliam ML. Supporting women at the time of abortion: a mixed‐methods study of male partner experiences and perspectives. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018;50(2):75‐83. doi:10.1363/PSRH.12059
Nguyen BT, Jacobsohn TL. Post‐abortion contraception, an opportunity for male partners and male contraception. Contraception. 2022;115:69‐74. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2022.07.004. Published online.
The Right to Contraception: State and Federal Actions, Misinformation, and the Courts | KFF. Accessed February 13, 2024. https://www.kff.org/womens‐health‐policy/issue‐brief/the‐right‐to‐contraception‐state‐and‐federal‐actions‐misinformation‐and‐the‐courts/
Campelia GD, Abbe C, Nickels LM, McElmeel E, Amory JK. “Shared risk”: reframing risk analysis in the ethics of novel male contraceptives. Contraception. 2020;102(2):67. doi:10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2020.05.014
Behre HM, Zitzmann M, Anderson RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of an injectable combination hormonal contraceptive for men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. doi:10.1210/jc.2016‐2141. Published online 2016:jc20162141.

Auteurs

Brian T Nguyen (BT)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
The Lundquist Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Classifications MeSH