Correction of osteopetrosis in the neonate
HSC mobilization
TCIRG1 gene
conditioning
gene therapy
hematopoietic stem cells
lentiviral vector
osteoclast
osteopetrosis
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
17
06
2024
accepted:
05
08
2024
medline:
24
9
2024
pubmed:
24
9
2024
entrez:
24
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (ARO) is a rare genetic disease, characterized by increased bone density due to defective osteoclast function. Most of the cases are due to The First, we showed that lentiviral vector GT can revert the osteopetrotic bone phenotype, allowing long-term survival and reducing extramedullary haematopoiesis. Then, we demonstrated that plerixafor-induced mobilization can further increase the high number of HSPCs circulating in peripheral blood, facilitating the collection of adequate numbers of cells for therapeutic purposes. Finally, pre-transplant non-genotoxic conditioning allowed the stable engraftment of HSPCs, albeit at lower level than conventional total body irradiation, and led to long-term survival and correction of bone phenotype, in the absence of acute toxicity. These results will pave the way to the implementation of an effective GT protocol, reducing the transplant-related complication risks in the very young and severely affected ARO patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39314524
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1450349
pmc: PMC11416974
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1450349Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Penna, Zecchillo, Di Verniere, Fontana, Iannello, Palagano, Mantero, Cappelleri, Rizzoli, Santi, Crisafulli, Filibian, Forlino, Basso-Ricci, Scala, Scanziani, Schinke, Ficara, Sobacchi, Villa and Capo.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.