Mini Review: the non-neuronal cardiac cholinergic system in type-2 diabetes mellitus.
acetylcholine
angiogenesis
cardiomyocytes
diabetes mellitus
glucose metabolism
non-neuronal cardiac cholinergic system
Journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
29
04
2024
accepted:
22
08
2024
medline:
24
9
2024
pubmed:
24
9
2024
entrez:
24
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diabetic heart disease remains the leading cause of death in individuals with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Both insulin resistance and metabolic derangement, hallmark features of T2DM, develop early and progressively impair cardiovascular function. These factors result in altered cardiac metabolism and energetics, as well as coronary vascular dysfunction, among other consequences. Therefore, gaining a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of diabetic heart disease is crucial for developing novel therapies for T2DM-associated cardiovascular disease. Cardiomyocytes are equipped with the cholinergic machinery, known as the non-neuronal cardiac cholinergic system (NNCCS), for synthesizing and secreting acetylcholine (ACh) as well as possessing muscarinic ACh receptor for ACh binding and initiating signaling cascade. ACh from cardiomyocytes regulates glucose metabolism and energetics, endothelial function, and among others, in an auto/paracrine manner. Presently, there is only one preclinical animal model - diabetic db/db mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of choline transferase (
Identifiants
pubmed: 39314774
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1425534
pmc: PMC11417620
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1425534Informations de copyright
© 2024 Saw, Fronius, Katare and Kakinuma.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.