Head-to-head comparison of two human papillomavirus vaccines for efficacy against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and adenocarcinoma

cervical neoplasia follow-up human papillomavirus randomized trial vaccine efficacy

Journal

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology
ISSN: 2235-2988
Titre abrégé: Front Cell Infect Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101585359

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 24 05 2024
accepted: 29 07 2024
medline: 24 9 2024
pubmed: 24 9 2024
entrez: 24 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We report head-to-head comparison of the bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccine efficacies against immediate precursors of cervical cancer from 15 years' country-wide cancer registry follow-up of phase III trial cohorts and an age-aligned cohort of unvaccinated women. These individually and/or clusterrandomized cohorts of HPV6/11/16/18- and HPV16/18-vaccinated and unvaccinated women were enrolled, respectively, in 2002, 2004, and 2003/2005. The trial cohorts comprised initially 16- to 17-year-old HPV6/11/16/18-vaccinated FUTURE II (NCT00092534) participants (866) and HPV16/18-vaccinated PATRICIA (NCT00122681) and 012 trial (NCT00169494) participants (2,465), and 16,526 initially 16- to 19-year-old unvaccinated controls. After active 4-year clinical follow-up, passive, country-wide Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR) follow-up for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) was based on consented use of unique personal identifiers and started 6 months after the end of the FUTURE II and PATRICIA trials in 2007 and 2009, and ended at the end of 2019. The follow-up with altogether 229,020 follow-up years was age-aligned to ensure that similarly aged cohorts were passively followed up for 15 years post=vaccination for the intention-to-treat analyses of vaccine efficacy. Overall, we identified 5 and 16 CIN3 (no AIS) cases in the HPV6/11/16/18 and HPV16/18 cohorts, respectively, during the FCR-based follow-up. In the unvaccinated cohort, we identified 281 CIN3 cases, 20 AIS cases, and 13 cases with invasive cervical cancer. Vaccine efficacies against CIN3+ were 68.4% and 64.5% for the quadrivalent and the bivalent vaccines, respectively, with overlapping confidence intervals. Long-term follow-up of randomized, initially adolescent HPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts shows, in this head-to-head setting, that the bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines are equally effective against immediate precursors of cervical cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39315334
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1437704
pmc: PMC11417099
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1437704

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Lehtinen, Gray, Luostarinen, Eriksson, Apter, Bly, Harjula, Heikkilä, Hokkanen, Kuortti, Nieminen, Nummela, Paavonen, Palmroth, Petäjä, Pimenoff, Pukkala and Dillner.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

DA, JD, ML, and JPaa have received grants for their HPV vaccination studies from Merck&Co. Inc. DA, JD, ML, and JPaa and GSK Biologicals DA, ML, JPaa. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Matti Lehtinen (M)

Department of CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Penelope Gray (P)

Department of CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Tapio Luostarinen (T)

Institute for Epidemiological Cancer Research, Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.

Tiina Eriksson (T)

Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Dan Apter (D)

Youth Clinic, VL-Medi, Helsinki, Finland.

Anne Bly (A)

Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Katja Harjula (K)

Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Kaisa Heikkilä (K)

Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Mari Hokkanen (M)

Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Marjo Kuortti (M)

Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Pekka Nieminen (P)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Mervi Nummela (M)

Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Jorma Paavonen (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Johanna Palmroth (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of East-Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Tiina Petäjä (T)

Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Ville N Pimenoff (VN)

Department of CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Eero Pukkala (E)

Institute for Epidemiological Cancer Research, Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.

Joakim Dillner (J)

Department of CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH