Hydroxychloroquine monotherapy in sarcoidosis: Indications, efficacy, and side effects.


Journal

Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG
ISSN: 2532-179X
Titre abrégé: Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9610928

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 22 11 2023
accepted: 24 05 2024
medline: 24 9 2024
pubmed: 24 9 2024
entrez: 24 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In sarcoidosis which is not threatening vital internal organs such as heart, central nervous system or lungs immunomodulatory treatment, such as hydroxychloroquine can be considered. Despite its common use, limited data are available regarding effectiveness and side effects as monotherapy in sarcoidosis. Recommendations on its usage are based on expert opinion as literature is scarce. This retrospective study examines real-world data about the indications, effectivity and side effects of hydroxychloroquine monotherapy in sarcoidosis patients with no damage to the vital internal organs. Successful treatment was defined as continuation after 24 weeks without step up therapy or worsening of symptoms. Sixty patients were eligible for the study. Starting dose was 400mg/day, lowered to 200mg/day after 3 months in most patients. The predominant treatment indications were musculoskeletal 45 (75%) and cutaneous involvement 13 (22%). Thirty-three patients (55%) continued treatment after 24 weeks. Twenty-four patients (40%) mentioned side effects, mainly gastrointestinal, leading to treatment discontinuation in eleven patients (18%). No severe side effects were seen. Continuation after 24 weeks was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous involvement compared to other indications 85% vs 47% respectively (p =0.02). Treatment with hydroxychloroquine monotherapy was satisfactory in 55% of patients, especially for cutaneous involvement. However, it poses considerable non-severe side-effects.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIM OBJECTIVE
In sarcoidosis which is not threatening vital internal organs such as heart, central nervous system or lungs immunomodulatory treatment, such as hydroxychloroquine can be considered. Despite its common use, limited data are available regarding effectiveness and side effects as monotherapy in sarcoidosis. Recommendations on its usage are based on expert opinion as literature is scarce.
METHODS METHODS
This retrospective study examines real-world data about the indications, effectivity and side effects of hydroxychloroquine monotherapy in sarcoidosis patients with no damage to the vital internal organs. Successful treatment was defined as continuation after 24 weeks without step up therapy or worsening of symptoms.
RESULTS RESULTS
Sixty patients were eligible for the study. Starting dose was 400mg/day, lowered to 200mg/day after 3 months in most patients. The predominant treatment indications were musculoskeletal 45 (75%) and cutaneous involvement 13 (22%). Thirty-three patients (55%) continued treatment after 24 weeks. Twenty-four patients (40%) mentioned side effects, mainly gastrointestinal, leading to treatment discontinuation in eleven patients (18%). No severe side effects were seen. Continuation after 24 weeks was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous involvement compared to other indications 85% vs 47% respectively (p =0.02).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with hydroxychloroquine monotherapy was satisfactory in 55% of patients, especially for cutaneous involvement. However, it poses considerable non-severe side-effects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39315981
doi: 10.36141/svdld.v41i3.15445
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e2024039

Auteurs

Britney Vermeer (B)

Division of heart and lungs, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands and Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Centre of Excellence, department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Marcel Veltkamp (M)

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Centre of Excellence, department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands and Division of heart and lungs, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Lisette Regina Maria Raasing (LRM)

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Centre of Excellence, department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Anne Elisabeth Wind (AE)

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Centre of Excellence, department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Adriane Dore Marie Vorselaars (ADM)

Division of heart and lungs, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH