Clinical relevance of patient-reported outcome measures in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Arthroplasty
Hip
PROMs
Patient-reported outcome measures
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Sep 2024
24 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
22
08
2024
accepted:
11
09
2024
medline:
24
9
2024
pubmed:
24
9
2024
entrez:
24
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In orthopaedic research, it is crucial to determine changes that are statistically significant and clinically meaningful. One approach to accomplish this is by calculating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), the Clinically Important Differences (CID), the Minimum Detectable Change (MDC), the Minimal Important Change (MIC), and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) values. These tools assist medical professionals in comprehending the patient's viewpoint, enabling them to establish treatment objectives that align with patients' desires and expectations. The present systematic review investigated the MCID, MIC, CID, MDC, and PASS of the most used PROMs to assess patients who have undergone THA. This systematic review followed the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed were accessed in March 2024 without time constraints or additional filters. All the clinical investigations which evaluated data tools (MCID, MIC, CID, MDC, and PASS) to assess the clinical relevance of PROMs in THA were accessed. Articles in Spanish, Italian, German, and English were eligible. Studies with levels of evidence I to III were eligible. Data from 100,824 patients were collected. All relevant demographic data were analysed and summarised. In addition, the MCID, MIC, CID, MDC and PASS of the COMI, HOOS, SF-36, OHS, Oxford-12, PROMIS-PF, SF-12, and WOMAC scores for THA were determined. Current evidence recommends to collect MCIDs based on anchors routinely. These values should be used as complementary tools to determine the clinical effectiveness of a treatment instead of solely relying on statistically significant improvements. Level IV, systematic review and meta-analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39316103
doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05579-w
pii: 10.1007/s00402-024-05579-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Migliorini F, Cuozzo F, Oliva F, Eschweiler J, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N (2023) CT-based navigation for total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 28(1):443. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01437-4
doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01437-4
pubmed: 37853456
pmcid: 10583311
Supra R, Supra R, Agrawal DK (2023) Surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Med 5(2):232–240. https://doi.org/10.26502/josm.511500106
doi: 10.26502/josm.511500106
pubmed: 37388321
pmcid: 10310317
Migliorini F, Biagini M, Rath B, Meisen N, Tingart M, Eschweiler J (2019) Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials. Int Orthop 43(7):1573–1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4124-3
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4124-3
pubmed: 30171273
Evans JT, Evans JP, Walker RW, Blom AW, Whitehouse MR, Sayers A (2019) How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet 393(10172):647–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31665-9
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31665-9
pubmed: 30782340
pmcid: 6376618
Salman LA, Alzobi OZ, Al-Ani A, Hantouly AT, Al-Juboori M, Ahmed G (2024) The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of hip versus osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 34(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03635-6
doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03635-6
pubmed: 37415008
Migliorini F, Pintore A, Eschweiler J, Oliva F, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N (2022) Factors influencing the outcomes of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 17(1):281. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03168-4
doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03168-4
pubmed: 35585545
pmcid: 9118783
Alessio-Mazzola M, Colombo P, Barducci N, Ghezzi E, Zagra L, Caldora P, Ometti M, Placella G, Salini V (2024) Direct anterior approach with conventional instruments versus robotic posterolateral approach in elective total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a case-control study. J Orthop Traumatol 25(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00753-7
doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00753-7
pubmed: 38381320
pmcid: 10881946
Sakai H, Watanabe N, Kuroyanagi G, Fukuoka M, Usami T, Ueki Y, Murakami H (2023) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty with the revelation hip system using density mapping. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33(2):435–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03210-5
doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03210-5
pubmed: 35092509
Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Trivellas M, Eschweiler J, Hildebrand F, Betsch M (2022) Total hip arthroplasty compared to bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced hip fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48(4):2655–2666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01905-2
doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01905-2
pubmed: 35182161
pmcid: 9360085
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370(9597):1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
pubmed: 17964352
Bastian JD (2023) Total hip arthroplasty-current challenges. Medicina (Kaunas). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061011
doi: 10.3390/medicina59061011
pubmed: 37374215
Copay AG, Eyberg B, Chung AS, Zurcher KS, Chutkan N, Spangehl MJ (2018) Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature, part ii: lower extremity: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 6(9):e2. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00160
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00160
pubmed: 30179898
Nunley B, Mulligan EP, Chhabra A, Fey NP, Wells J (2023) Relationships between self-perceived and clinical expression of pain and function differ based on the underlying pathology of the human hip. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24(1):635. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06768-1
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06768-1
pubmed: 37550652
pmcid: 10405504
Jin H, He M, Xie W, Xiong Z, Deng Z, Li Y (2023) Research trends of patient-reported outcome measures in orthopedic medical practices: a bibliometric and visualized study. Medicina (Kaunas). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091664
doi: 10.3390/medicina59091664
pubmed: 37763783
Walsh JM, Huddleston HP, Alzein MM, Wong SE, Forsythe B, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Yanke AB (2022) The minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient-acceptable symptomatic state after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 4(2):e661–e678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.12.009
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.12.009
pubmed: 35494257
pmcid: 9042905
Stern BZ, Pila S, Joseph LI, Rothrock NE, Franklin PD (2022) Patients’ perspectives on the benefits of feedback on patient-reported outcome measures in a web-based personalized decision report for hip and knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23(1):806. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05764-1
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05764-1
pubmed: 35999585
pmcid: 9395772
Ackerman IN, Soh SE, Harris IA, Cashman K, Heath E, Lorimer M, Graves SE (2021) Performance of the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments for evaluating outcomes from joint replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 29(6):815–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2021.03.003
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.03.003
pubmed: 33727118
Holmenlund C, Overgaard S, Bilberg R, Varnum C (2021) Evaluation of the Oxford hip score: does it still have content validity? Interviews of total hip arthroplasty patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 19(1):237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01869-8
doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01869-8
pubmed: 34627269
pmcid: 8501736
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840
pubmed: 3068365
Pulik Ł, Romaniuk K, Jaśkiewicz K, Wojtyński P, Łęgosz P, Małdyk P (2020) An update on joint-specific outcome measures in total hip replacement. Reumatologia 58(2):107–115. https://doi.org/10.5114/reum.2020.95366
doi: 10.5114/reum.2020.95366
pubmed: 32476684
pmcid: 7249528
Nilsdotter A, Bremander A (2011) Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(Suppl 11):S200-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20549
doi: 10.1002/acr.20549
pubmed: 22588745
Klässbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E (2003) Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol 32(1):46–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009740310000409
doi: 10.1080/03009740310000409
pubmed: 12635946
Laucis NC, Hays RD, Bhattacharyya T (2015) Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics: a brief guide. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(19):1628–1634. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00030
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00030
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34(3):220–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
pubmed: 8628042
Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T (2007) The 36-item short form. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(2):126–134. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200702000-00007
doi: 10.5435/00124635-200702000-00007
pubmed: 17277259
Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118(8):622–629. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009
pubmed: 8452328
Migliorini F, Liu Y, Eschweiler J, Baroncini A, Tingart M, Maffulli N (2022) Increased range of motion but otherwise similar clinical outcome of arthroscopy over open osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement at midterm follow-up: a systematic review. Surgeon 20(3):194–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2021.01.016
doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.01.016
pubmed: 33731304
Meadows KA (2011) Patient-reported outcome measures: an overview. Br J Community Nurs 16(3):146–151. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.3.146
doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.3.146
pubmed: 21378658
de Oliveira FS, Hurwitz G, Kim J, Liberty J, Orchard K, Liu G, Barbera L, Howell D (2021) Identifying patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for routine surveillance of physical and emotional symptoms in head and neck cancer populations: a systematic review. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184162
doi: 10.3390/jcm10184162
pubmed: 34884333
pmcid: 8658241
Paul S, Barik S, Raj V, Raj M, Kalia RB, Goyal T, Arora M, Nazeer M (2023) A cross sectional survey exploring the awareness and familiarity regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) among joint reconstruction surgeons in India. J Orthop 37:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.009
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.009
pubmed: 36974097
pmcid: 10039111
Karhade AV, Bono CM, Schwab JH, Tobert DG (2021) Minimum clinically important difference: a metric that matters in the age of patient-reported outcomes. J Bone Jt Surg Am 103(24):2331–2337. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00773
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00773
Nwachukwu BU, Chang B, Fields K, Rebolledo BJ, Nawabi DH, Kelly BT, Ranawat AS (2017) Defining the “substantial clinical benefit” after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 45(6):1297–1303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516687541
doi: 10.1177/0363546516687541
pubmed: 28298057
Jones IA, Togashi R, Heckmann N, Vangsness CT Jr (2020) Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported shoulder outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29(7):1484–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.033
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.033
pubmed: 32249146
Alben MG, Gambhir N, Shankar D, Gordon D, Zuckerman JD, Virk MS (2023) Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) of upper extremity PROMIS scores in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. Clin Rheumatol 42(2):579–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06479-3
doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06479-3
pubmed: 36547817
Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Schäfer L, Simeone F, Bell A, Hofmann UK (2024) Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Relat Res 36(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-024-00210-z
doi: 10.1186/s43019-024-00210-z
pubmed: 38212863
pmcid: 10782530
Bloom DA, Kaplan DJ, Mojica E, Strauss EJ, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Campbell KA, Alaia MJ, Jazrawi LM (2023) The minimal clinically important difference: a review of clinical significance. Am J Sports Med 51(2):520–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211053869
doi: 10.1177/03635465211053869
pubmed: 34854345
Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC (2007) Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 7(5):541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008
pubmed: 17448732
Concoff A, Rosen J, Fu F, Bhandari M, Boyer K, Karlsson J, Einhorn TA, Schemitsch E (2019) A comparison of treatment effects for nonsurgical therapies and the minimum clinically important difference in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 7(8):e5. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00150
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00150
pubmed: 31415278
pmcid: 6727942
Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Murray DW, Carr AJ, Price AJ (2015) Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 68(1):73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009
pubmed: 25441700
pmcid: 4270450
Terwee CB, Peipert JD, Chapman R, Lai JS, Terluin B, Cella D, Griffiths P, Mokkink LB (2021) Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res 30(10):2729–2754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y
doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y
pubmed: 34247326
pmcid: 8481206
Jevsevar DS (2013) Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(9):571–576. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-571
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-571
pubmed: 23996988
Liu JN, Gowd AK, Redondo ML, Christian DR, Cabarcas BC, Yanke AB, Cole BJ (2019) Establishing clinically significant outcomes after meniscal allograft transplantation. Orthop J Sports Med 7(1):2325967118818462. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118818462
doi: 10.1177/2325967118818462
pubmed: 30643837
pmcid: 6322105
Naylor JM, Hayen A, Davidson E, Hackett D, Harris IA, Kamalasena G, Mittal R (2014) Minimal detectable change for mobility and patient-reported tools in people with osteoarthritis awaiting arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:235. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-235
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-235
pubmed: 25015083
pmcid: 4105400
Keurentjes JC, Fiocco M, Nelissen RG (2014) Willingness to undergo surgery again validated clinically important differences in health-related quality of life after total hip replacement or total knee replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 67(1):114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.010
pubmed: 23850406
Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10(4):407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
pubmed: 2691207
Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J (2008) Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 61(2):102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
pubmed: 18177782
Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C
doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C
pubmed: 12719681
Howick J CI, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Carl Heneghan, Liberati A, Moschetti I, Phillips B, Thornton H, Goddard O, Hodgkinson M (2011) The 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Available at https://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 . Accessed Nov 2023
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hrobjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
pubmed: 33782057
pmcid: 8005924
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, Thomas J (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:ED000142. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000142
doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hrobjartsson A, Kirkham J, Juni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schunemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919
pubmed: 27733354
pmcid: 5062054
McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT (2021) Risk-of-bias visualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods 12(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411
pubmed: 32336025
Higgins JPT TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (2022) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2. Cochrane 2021. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook . Accessed on Feb 2022
Humphrey TJ, Salimy MS, Duvvuri P, Melnic CM, Bedair HS, Alpaugh K (2023) A matched comparison of the rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference following conversion and primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 38(9):1767–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.029
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.029
pubmed: 36931363
Berliner JL, Brodke DJ, Chan V, SooHoo NF, Bozic KJ (2016) John Charnley award: preoperative patient-reported outcome measures predict clinically meaningful improvement in function after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):321–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4350-6
doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4350-6
pubmed: 26201420
Chesworth BM, Mahomed NN, Bourne RB, Davis AM, OJRR Study Group (2008) Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 61(9):907–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.014
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.014
pubmed: 18687289
Grits D, Emara AK, Orr MN, Rullan PJ, Murray TG, Higuera CA, Krebs VE, Molloy RM, Piuzzi NS (2023) Preoperative veteran RAND-12 mental composite score of >60 associated with increased likelihood of patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 38(7S2):S258–S264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.001
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.001
pubmed: 36516888
Lyman S, Lee YY, McLawhorn AS, Islam W, MacLean CH (2018) What are the minimal and substantial improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR versions after total joint replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 476(12):2432–2441. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456
pubmed: 30179951
pmcid: 6259893
Putman S, Dartus J, Migaud H, Pasquier G, Girard J, Preda C, Duhamel A (2021) Can the minimal clinically important difference be determined in a French-speaking population with primary hip replacement using one PROM item and the Anchor strategy? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107(3):102830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102830
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102830
pubmed: 33524632
Quintana JM, Escobar A, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I (2005) Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13(12):1076–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.06.012
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.06.012
pubmed: 16154777
Quintana JM, Aguirre U, Barrio I, Orive M, Garcia S, Escobar A (2012) Outcomes after total hip replacement based on patients’ baseline status: what results can be expected? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64(4):563–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21570
doi: 10.1002/acr.21570
pubmed: 22183807
Stadelmann VA, Rudiger HA, Nauer S, Leunig M (2022) Impact of capsular preservation on patient-reported outcomes and complication rates in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach. Bone Jt J 104-B(7):826–832. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1765.R1
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1765.R1
Yeo MGH, Goh GS, Chen JY, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Liow MHL (2020) Are Oxford hip score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index useful predictors of clinical meaningful improvement and satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 35(9):2458–2464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.034
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.034
pubmed: 32416955
Hung M, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Saltzman CL (2018) Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics. World J Orthop 9(3):41–49. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.41
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.41
pubmed: 29564213
pmcid: 5859199
Kunze KN, Fontana MA, MacLean CH, Lyman S, McLawhorn AS (2022) Defining the patient acceptable symptom state for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR after primary total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 104(4):345–352. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00550
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00550
Bendich I, Tarity TD, Alpaugh K, Lyman S, Sculco PK, McLawhorn AS (2022) Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at one year postoperatively in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 37(8S):S954–S957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.044
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.044
pubmed: 35091032
Ostojic M, Winkler PW, Karlsson J, Becker R, Prill R (2023) Minimal clinically important difference: don’t just look at the “p-value.” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31(10):4077–4079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07512-x
doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07512-x
pubmed: 37460662
Rossi MJ, Brand JC, Lubowitz JH (2023) Minimally clinically important difference (MCID) is a low bar. Arthroscopy 39(2):139–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.001
pubmed: 36603986
Cote MP, Lubowitz JH, Brand JC, Rossi MJ (2021) Misinterpretation of P values and statistical power creates a false sense of certainty: statistical significance, lack of significance, and the uncertainty challenge. Arthroscopy 37(4):1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.010
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.010
pubmed: 33812509
Chung AS, Copay AG, Olmscheid N, Campbell D, Walker JB, Chutkan N (2017) Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the spine literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(14):1096–1105. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001990
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001990
pubmed: 27870805
Deckey DG, Verhey JT, Gerhart CRB, Christopher ZK, Spangehl MJ, Clarke HD, Bingham JS (2023) There are considerable inconsistencies among minimum clinically important differences in TKA: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 481(1):63–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002440
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002440
pubmed: 36200846
Su F, Allahabadi S, Bongbong DN, Feeley BT, Lansdown DA (2021) Minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state of outcome measures relating to shoulder pathology and surgery: a systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 14(1):27–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09684-2
doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09684-2
pubmed: 33433840
pmcid: 7930136
Deckey DG, Verhey JT, Christopher ZK, Gerhart CRB, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ, Bingham JS (2023) Discordance abounds in minimum clinically important differences in THA: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 481(4):702–714. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002434
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002434
pubmed: 36398323
Zhang Y, Xi X, Huang Y (2023) The anchor design of anchor-based method to determine the minimal clinically important difference: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 21(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02157-3
doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02157-3
pubmed: 37454099
pmcid: 10350268
Kuo AC, Giori NJ, Bowe TR, Manfredi L, Lalani NF, Nordin DA, Harris AHS (2020) Comparing methods to determine the minimal clinically important differences in patient-reported outcome measures for veterans undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty in veterans health administration hospitals. JAMA Surg 155(5):404–411. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0024
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0024
pubmed: 32211842
Mouelhi Y, Jouve E, Castelli C, Gentile S (2020) How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods. Health Qual Life Outcomes 18(1):136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01344-w
doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01344-w
pubmed: 32398083
pmcid: 7218583
Wright A, Hannon J, Hegedus EJ, Kavchak AE (2012) Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). J Man Manip Ther 20(3):160–166. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042618612y.0000000001
doi: 10.1179/2042618612y.0000000001
pubmed: 23904756
pmcid: 3419574
Franceschini M, Boffa A, Pignotti E, Andriolo L, Zaffagnini S, Filardo G (2023) The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the different calculation methods. Am J Sports Med 51(4):1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231152484
doi: 10.1177/03635465231152484
pubmed: 36811558
pmcid: 10026158
Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR (2003) Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 56(5):395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00044-1
doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00044-1
pubmed: 12812812
Copay AG, Chung AS, Eyberg B, Olmscheid N, Chutkan N, Spangehl MJ (2018) Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature, part I: upper extremity: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 6(9):e1. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00159
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00159
pubmed: 30179897
Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O’Rourke K, Molnar FJ, Mahon J, Chan KB, Wells G (2002) Determination of the clinical importance of study results. J Gen Intern Med 17(6):469–476. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11111.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11111.x
pubmed: 12133163
pmcid: 1495062
Katz NP, Paillard FC, Ekman E (2015) Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions. J Orthop Surg Res 10:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x
doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x
pubmed: 25645576
pmcid: 4327973
Bannuru RR, Vaysbrot EE, McIntyre LF (2014) Did the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons osteoarthritis guidelines miss the mark? Arthroscopy 30(1):86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.007
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.007
pubmed: 24384274
Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, Boisgard S, Galvin M, Ravaud P, Poiraudeau S (2014) Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-53
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-53
pubmed: 24564856
pmcid: 3936828
Conner-Spady BL, Bohm E, Loucks L, Dunbar MJ, Marshall DA, Noseworthy TW (2020) Patient expectations and satisfaction 6 and 12 months following total hip and knee replacement. Qual Life Res 29(3):705–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02359-7
doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02359-7
pubmed: 31741216
Kawai T, Kataoka M, Goto K, Kuroda Y, So K, Matsuda S (2018) Patient- and surgery-related factors that affect patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100358
doi: 10.3390/jcm7100358
pubmed: 30326640
pmcid: 6211084
Halawi MJ, Jongbloed W, Baron S, Savoy L, Cote MP, Lieberman JR (2020) Patient-reported outcome measures are not a valid proxy for patient satisfaction in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35(2):335–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.033
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.033
pubmed: 31611162
Rogers BA, Alolabi B, Carrothers AD, Kreder HJ, Jenkinson RJ (2015) Can the pre-operative Western Ontario and McMaster score predict patient satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty? Bone Jt J 97-B(2):150–153. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34718
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34718
Judge A, Arden NK, Price A, Glyn-Jones S, Beard D, Carr AJ, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Field RE (2011) Assessing patients for joint replacement: can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection? J Bone Jt Surg Br 93(12):1660–1664. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B12.27046
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B12.27046