The influence of lumbar vertebra and cage related factors on cage-endplate contact after lumbar interbody fusion: An in-vitro experimental study.

Cadaveric experiment Cage-endplate contact Lumbar interbody fusion Spinal cage

Journal

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
ISSN: 1878-0180
Titre abrégé: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101322406

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 08 02 2024
revised: 05 09 2024
accepted: 20 09 2024
medline: 25 9 2024
pubmed: 25 9 2024
entrez: 24 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) using interbody cages is an established treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease, but fusion results are known to be affected by risk factors such as bone mineral density (BMD), endplate geometry and cage position. At present, direct measurement of endplate-cage contact variables that affect LIF have not been fully identified. The aim of this study was to use cadaveric experiments to investigate the dependency between BMD, endplate geometry, cage parameters like type, orientation, position, and contact variables like stress and area. One vertebral body specimen from each of the five lumbar positions was harvested from five male donors. The lower half of each vertebra was potted and placed in a material testing machine (Instron 8874). A spinal cage was clamped to the machine then lowered to bring it into contact against the superior endplate. A lockable ball-joint was used to rotate the cage such that its inferior surface was congruent with the local endplate surface. A pressure sensor (Tekscan) was placed between the cage and endplate to record contact area and the peak and average contact pressures. Axial compression of 400 N was performed for five positions using a straight cage, and in one anterior position using a curved cage. The linear mixed model was utilised to perform data analyses for experimental results with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The results indicated two trends toward significance for contact area, one for volumetric BMD (vBMD) of the vertebra (p = 0.081), and another for predicted contact area (p = 0.057). Peak contact pressure correlated significantly with vBMD (p = 0.041), and there was a trend between average contact pressure and lateral position of cage (p = 0.051). In addition, predicted contact area correlated significantly with cage orientation (p < 0.001). These results indicated that high vBMD of vertebra and a medially positioned cage led to higher contact pressures. Logically, low vBMD of vertebra and transverse cage orientation increased the contact area between the cage and endplate. In conclusion, the study identified significant influence of vBMD of vertebra, cage position and orientation on cage-endplate contact which may help to inform cage selection and design for LIF.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39317094
pii: S1751-6161(24)00386-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106754
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106754

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Yihang Yu (Y)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.

Dale L Robinson (DL)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.

David C Ackland (DC)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.

Yi Yang (Y)

Department of Orthopaedics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.

Peter Vee Sin Lee (PVS)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia. Electronic address: pvlee@unimelb.edu.au.

Classifications MeSH